Critical Vulnerabilities in CyberData SIP Emergency Intercom Drive ICS Security Alarm

Critical vulnerabilities recently discovered in the CyberData 011209 SIP Emergency Intercom have sent shockwaves through the industrial control systems (ICS) security community. With a combined CVSS v4 score reaching as high as 9.3, and several attack vectors rated at low complexity and capable of remote exploitation, the risks surrounding this popular emergency communications device underline why security must remain top of mind for both manufacturers and operators alike.

A Stark Warning for ICS Security: The CyberData 011209 Case​

The CyberData 011209 SIP Emergency Intercom, deployed worldwide across critical sectors such as communications, emergency services, and commercial facilities, lies at the heart of security and life-safety systems in countless organizations. By design, such devices enable swift voice communication during emergencies or disruptions. However, as the details of five separate vulnerabilities demonstrate, the potential for disruption now extends to the very systems intended to keep people safe.

Executive Summary​

• CVSS v4 Score: 9.3 (max)
• Attack Complexity: Low; can be exploited remotely
• Affected Versions: 011209 SIP Emergency Intercom, prior to v22.0.1
• Key Vulnerabilities:
• Authentication Bypass (CVE-2025-30184)
• Missing Authentication for Critical Function (CVE-2025-26468)
• SQL Injection (CVE-2025-30507)
• Insufficiently Protected Credentials (CVE-2025-30183)
• Path Traversal ('.../...//', CVE-2025-30515)
• Potential Impact: Information disclosure, denial-of-service, code execution

Technical Deep Dive: The Flaws Explained​

1. Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path (CVE-2025-30184)​

A recurring issue in embedded ICS devices, authentication bypass allows an attacker to access the device’s web interface without proper credentials. This particular flaw in the 011209 intercom gives unauthenticated users an alternate route to critical controls, opening the door to potential administrative takeover or sabotage.

Key Details:​

• CVSS v4: 9.3, reflecting the ease and impact of network-based attacks.
• Exploit Vector: Remote, no authentication required, minimal complexity
• Potential Impact: High impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability

Independent analysis by CISA and Claroty Team82 confirms the risk, stating that a successful exploit could yield full administrative control or allow attackers to disable the device at will.

2. Missing Authentication for Critical Function (CVE-2025-26468)​

This vulnerability exposes vital device functions that should remain behind authentication barriers. Poor design leaves open critical endpoints, making denial-of-service (DoS) attacks—where an attacker forces the device offline—alarmingly simple.

Key Details:​

• CVSS v4: 8.7 (CVSS v3.1: 7.5)
• Threat Model: Unauthenticated, remote attackers can trigger critical actions
• Resulting Risk: Attackers may disrupt emergency communications with little effort

Considering these systems’ role in emergencies, successful exploitation could hinder coordinated responses at a critical moment, compounding risk for any organization relying on these devices for safety or security.

3. SQL Injection (CVE-2025-30507)​

Though SQL injection attacks are best known in the context of web application hacking, their presence in ICS hardware highlights the pervasiveness of insecure software development practices. Here, an unauthenticated attacker can manipulate the device’s database queries, gaining access to sensitive information through blind SQL injection.

Key Details:​

• CVSS v4: 6.9 (CVSS v3.1: 5.3)
• Method: Remote attacker injects malicious SQL via web requests, extracting data without proper authorization
• Associated Risks: Data leakage, information gathering

Claroty’s Vera Mens, who reported these vulnerabilities, stresses that “blind” SQL injection can serve as a stealthy precursor to more destructive attacks, silently exposing configuration or credential data.

4. Insufficiently Protected Credentials (CVE-2025-30183)​

A critical oversight in credential storage means that web server admin credentials are not adequately encrypted or protected. Should an attacker gain access—perhaps through one of the other vulnerabilities—they could uncover plaintext credentials and reuse them to expand their foothold in the victim’s network.

Key Details:​

• CVSS v4: 8.7 (CVSS v3.1: 7.5)
• Risk: Theft of device admin credentials enables lateral movement throughout the ICS or broader IT network

Credential management remains one of the most fundamental aspects of ICS security, and its absence greatly increases the risk from even low-sophistication attackers.

5. Path Traversal: '.../...//' (CVE-2025-30515)​

Rounding out the list, a path traversal vulnerability allows even an authenticated but low-privilege attacker to upload arbitrary files to unintended locations on the device’s file system. This has direct implications for code execution and persistence—attackers can implant malicious scripts or binaries that could provide ongoing access or destroy device functionality.

Key Details:​

• CVSS v4: 9.3 (CVSS v3.1: 9.8)
• Simple Exploitation: Only basic privileges are required
• Impact: Potential device hijacking, backdoor creation, or destruction

Path traversal attacks are particularly dangerous in embedded systems, as the underlying operating system is often not designed for robust process isolation or intrusion detection, making persistent compromise a real and present danger.

Risk Evaluation: How Serious Is the Threat?​

To put it simply: Very serious. CISA classified these vulnerabilities as having the potential for information disclosure, denial-of-service, and even remote code execution. In the context of ICS and emergency communications equipment, the consequences can be severe:

• Compromised Emergency Response: Attackers could prevent legitimate use of intercom systems during actual emergencies, endangering lives.
• Data Leakage: Sensitive credentials, network configurations, and call records could be exfiltrated, assisting attackers in planning broader ICS campaigns.
• Widespread Downtime: Even a simple DoS attack against these widely deployed devices could disrupt operations across multiple sites.

What makes these risks especially troubling is the low complexity required to exploit them—most are remotely accessible without authentication, and require no specialized knowledge beyond basic scripting skills.

Critical Infrastructure in the Crosshairs​

CyberData’s products are deployed worldwide, with strong penetration in communications, commercial, and emergency services sectors. The intercom’s popularity is, paradoxically, part of its weakness: a flaw in one device can have outsized impact due to homogenous deployments and the often-central role of such systems in critical workflows.
The United States-based vendor responded quickly by releasing v22.0.1, a patched firmware version that addresses these vulnerabilities. However, the window between disclosure and widespread patch adoption often remains dangerously wide, especially in environments where downtime is difficult to schedule or firmware updates are implemented manually.
CyberData’s 011209 is by no means unique: weak security controls and flawed software development have historically plagued the ICS/OT (Operational Technology) sector. This case, however, stands out due to both the nature of the vulnerabilities and their presence in life-safety equipment.

Mitigation Guidance: What Should Operators Do?​

Patch Immediately:
CyberData advises all users to update to firmware v22.0.1 or later. This is non-negotiable; unpatched systems remain at high risk for exploitation.
Implement Robust Network Segmentation:
The US CISA (Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency) has reiterated core ICS cyber hygiene principles in response to these findings:

• ICS devices must not be exposed directly to the internet.
• All ICS and SCADA systems should be isolated—both physically and logically—behind firewalls.
• Where remote access is absolutely required, only use encrypted VPNs. However, remember that VPNs themselves are not infallible; keep all components updated, and verify connected endpoint security.

Layered Defense:
Adopt a “defense-in-depth” approach. The principle here is simple: every critical function should be protected by multiple independent security barriers. Do not rely solely on perimeter defenses.
Monitor and Respond:

• Constantly monitor system logs and network traffic for signs of exploitation or compromise.
• Report suspected incidents to CISA and pursue correlation with other ICS security events.

Educate and Harden Against Social Engineering:

• Train personnel not to click on unsolicited links or open suspicious attachments.
• Familiarize staff with methods to recognize phishing and other email-based social engineering attacks, as these may precede or accompany technical attacks on devices.

CISA offers detailed guides and recommended practices, alongside technical papers on targeted intrusion or proactive defense, all available via their ICS security portal.

An Industry-Wide Wake-Up Call​

The vulnerabilities in the CyberData 011209 SIP Emergency Intercom should sound a loud alarm for ICS manufacturers, asset owners, and defenders. If even a device as ostensibly “simple” as an intercom harbors multiple critical flaws, the attack surface of more complex industrial controllers and automated systems must be approached with humility and caution.

Notable Strengths and Industry Response​

While the vulnerabilities themselves indicate historical weaknesses in software and product design, the rapid response by CyberData and the collaborative work of Claroty Team82 and CISA represent a growing maturity in vulnerability disclosure and ICS security cooperation.

• Vendor Transparency: CyberData was prompt to acknowledge the issues and deliver a fix.
• Third-Party Verification: Claroty Team82’s independent research and public advisories ensure claims are well-substantiated.
• Governmental Support: CISA’s regular advisories, technical papers, and best-practice documents help bridge the gap between technical discovery and practical defense.

Remaining Risks and Unanswered Questions​

However, several risks remain:

• Patch Latency: Many organizations face internal hurdles when rolling out updates, especially in mission-critical or 24/7 environments. Even with a fix issued, vulnerable instances may persist in the wild for months—or longer.
• Supply Chain Blind Spots: Are derivative or OEM-branded versions also impacted? Operators relying on products from third-party vendors may not realize the core technology derives from CyberData’s firmware, and thus fail to patch promptly.
• Long Tail of Internet Exposure: Despite years of guidance, search engines like Shodan routinely find ICS devices directly exposed to the internet. Such exposure amplifies risk and highlights an ongoing disconnect between cybersecurity guidance and on-the-ground reality.

Lessons Learned: Designing for Security First​

The flaws in the CyberData 011209 expose all-too-common pitfalls in embedded device security:

• Never Trust the Network: Embedded systems designers often assume “only authorized personnel” can reach internal management interfaces. Modern attackers routinely breach such perimeters.
• Multi-Layered Authentication: Critical functions must always require explicit, multi-factor authentication.
• Sanitize Inputs: SQL injection attacks—decades old—remain commonplace because of basic failures in sanitization and validation of user input.
• Credential Management: Secure storage, strong hashing algorithms, and least-privilege principles are not optional, especially for devices controlling physical security.

Industry-wide adoption of secure-by-design principles is the only scalable answer. Regulatory bodies and procurement officers should demand formal vulnerability disclosure policies, proactive patching timelines, and third-party code audits as part of vendor selection criteria.

Conclusion: Security is Everyone’s Responsibility​

As the line between physical safety and digital reliability continues to blur, security incidents like those impacting the CyberData 011209 SIP Emergency Intercom serve as vital reminders. Robust patch management, layered security measures, regular independent assessments, and user education must be viewed not as “nice-to-haves” but as operational necessities.
No known public exploitation of these specific vulnerabilities has been reported as of this writing, but the threat landscape is fast-moving and persistent. All organizations deploying Internet-connected devices—especially those in life-safety or critical infrastructure roles—must remain vigilant and proactive.
Staying ahead means not just responding to the latest advisories, but anticipating where the next systemic failures will originate, and designing every aspect of ICS operation—from procurement and configuration, through maintenance and eventual decommissioning—with continual security in mind. In the fight to secure our digital and physical infrastructures, complacency is the ultimate vulnerability.

---

Source: CISA CyberData 011209 SIP Emergency Intercom | CISA