- Joined
- Jul 22, 2005
- Messages
- 8,984
- Thread Author
- #1
Celestra
Former Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2008
- Messages
- 2,448
Windows 7
As I understand, the naming goes in order.....
Windows 1 (What was 1 anyway? A punch card) ?
Windows 2
Windows 3
Windows NT 4.0 is 4
Windows XP is 5
(How does Windows 2000 fit in? Isn't between 5 and 6 ? Why don't they call it Windows 8) ?
Windows Vista is 6
Windows 7
As I understand, the naming goes in order.....
Windows 1 (What was 1 anyway? A punch card) ?
Windows 2
Windows 3
Windows NT 4.0 is 4
Windows XP is 5
(How does Windows 2000 fit in? Isn't between 5 and 6 ? Why don't they call it Windows 8) ?
Windows Vista is 6
Windows 7
liljangofett
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2007
- Messages
- 4
- Joined
- May 1, 2008
- Messages
- 5,555
Well, there are a few views around as to how it got to "7". This is mine!
1. 3.1
2. 3.5, 3.51 (minor update)
3. 4.0
4. 5.0 (2000)
5. 5.1 (XP)/5.2 (Server 03) <- group them together, one client, one server version, just numbered differently
6. 6.0 (Vista)
7. 7.0 (7)
Hey take it easy on us old uns, Celestra. I was a "1" user. But before that, I don't know why they were left out of the numbering system, there was Windows version1, and two versions of Windows 2. There was also a 2.1 computer specific release, for the 286 and 386.Then quickly came Windows 3.0, a bit of a "millenium" release. I used them all and up until 3.1 was seriously considering changing to a Mac.
1. 3.1
2. 3.5, 3.51 (minor update)
3. 4.0
4. 5.0 (2000)
5. 5.1 (XP)/5.2 (Server 03) <- group them together, one client, one server version, just numbered differently
6. 6.0 (Vista)
7. 7.0 (7)
Hey take it easy on us old uns, Celestra. I was a "1" user. But before that, I don't know why they were left out of the numbering system, there was Windows version1, and two versions of Windows 2. There was also a 2.1 computer specific release, for the 286 and 386.Then quickly came Windows 3.0, a bit of a "millenium" release. I used them all and up until 3.1 was seriously considering changing to a Mac.
liljangofett
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2007
- Messages
- 4
- Joined
- May 1, 2008
- Messages
- 5,555
Yes. My first was a ZX80, built from a kit. Next came the Commodore. I then experimented for a very brief time with an Apple A and moved on, before the PC came out, to a Sinclair 128. Must admit though, whilst at the time Bill gates was a very interesting and exciting youngster, we were all happy bashing MSdos or even digital research dos (cp/m). Windows was something to look at and play with but hopeless to use.
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2007
- Messages
- 36,156
Similar threads
- Featured
- Article
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 32
- Featured
- Article
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 34
- Featured
- Article
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 60
- Featured
- Article
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 39
- Featured
- Article
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 35