May 2025 Windows Patch Tuesday: Critical Zero-Days and Security Insights

In the wake of the May 2025 Patch Tuesday, Microsoft has once again underscored its critical role in defending the world’s most widely used operating system. With a security update repatching 72 unique vulnerabilities—among which five were actively exploited zero-days and two were publicly disclosed as zero-days before a fix was available—Windows administrators and enterprise IT security pros face a stark reminder: the threat landscape for Windows is both persistent and aggressively evolving.

The Scope of Microsoft’s May 2025 Patch Tuesday​

Every Patch Tuesday has its rhythm: a cadence of critical, important, and occasionally nagging flaws resolved after determined hunting by Microsoft engineers and third-party researchers. May’s update, however, stands out for the breadth of its reach and the severity of certain vulnerabilities addressed.
According to Microsoft’s official advisories and corroborated by independent security analysis, Patch Tuesday for May 2025 closed a total of 72 flaws. The breakdown is as follows:

Vulnerability Type	Number of Flaws
Elevation of Privilege	17
Security Feature Bypass	2
Remote Code Execution	28
Information Disclosure	15
Denial of Service	7
Spoofing	2

This tally notably excludes Azure, Dataverse, Mariner, and Microsoft Edge bugs that received separate treatment earlier in the month, ensuring that Windows endpoints and server platforms are the focus for this round.

Five Actively Exploited Zero-Days: How Bad Was It?​

Perhaps most consequential are the five zero-days that, according to Microsoft, have already been exploited by attackers in the wild. Zero-days are defined as vulnerabilities for which no fix was available at the time they became known or exploitable—leaving users exposed until an official patch is released.
Below, we critically examine each zero-day by type, impact, and potential risk, cross-referencing trusted advisory sources and security research.

CVE-2025-30400: Microsoft DWM Core Library Elevation of Privilege​

• What it is: A "Use after free" flaw within Windows Desktop Window Manager (DWM), exploited to elevate privileges on compromised systems.
• What’s at risk: Successful exploitation grants SYSTEM privileges, enabling attackers to take full control of targeted endpoints.
• Attribution: Microsoft Threat Intelligence Center.
• Risk Analysis: Elevation of privilege vulnerabilities are particularly dangerous when coupled with a foothold gained through phishing or malware, allowing attackers to bypass most endpoint security controls. This specific flaw's confirmation by Microsoft’s own Threat Intelligence division lends it high credibility and urgency.

CVE-2025-32701: Windows Common Log File System Driver Elevation of Privilege​

• What it is: Another "Use after free" bug, this time afflicting the Common Log File System (CLFS) driver—historically a magnet for privilege escalation exploits.
• Impact: Attackers can locally obtain SYSTEM privileges if they have prior access.
• Risk Analysis: The CLFS driver has seen numerous vulnerabilities over the past year, with exploitation routines frequently incorporated into active attack toolkits. Its simple, repeatable nature makes it a favorite among cybercriminals.

CVE-2025-32706: Windows Common Log File System Driver Elevation of Privilege​

• What it is: An "Improper input validation" exploit, again in the CLFS driver.
• What makes it distinct: This variant, attributed to contributors from Google Threat Intelligence Group and CrowdStrike, highlights collaborative industry effort and cross-company vigilance.
• Risk Analysis: Input validation flaws enable a spectrum of attacks, particularly when chained with social engineering or automation. This vulnerability’s rapid discovery and fix suggest it was both severe and tractable, though no public in-the-wild exploitation details have been disclosed.

CVE-2025-32709: Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege​

• What it is: A "Use after free" flaw in the core network driver (WinSock AFD).
• Impact: SYSTEM-level access is achievable for a local attacker.
• Risk Analysis: Any issue in a core networking driver—a foundational Windows component—merits heightened concern. Exploitation could enable lateral movement or persistent access in enterprise environments.

CVE-2025-30397: Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability​

• What it is: A remote code execution bug stemming from "type confusion" in the Microsoft Scripting Engine, typically leveraged via maliciously crafted links or web content.
• Vector: Attackers must trick users into clicking crafted links in Microsoft Edge or Internet Explorer.
• Risk Analysis: Although user interaction is required, the frequency of phishing and malvertising campaigns means this route to remote code execution remains terrifyingly viable. Notably, browsers and scripting engines are high-frequency target surfaces due to their ubiquity and complexity.

Two Publicly Disclosed (But Not Yet Exploited) Zero-Days​

Not all zero-days are immediately exploited in the wild, but public disclosure before a patch is ideal hunting ground for would-be attackers. Two such vulnerabilities stand out:

CVE-2025-26685: Microsoft Defender for Identity Spoofing Vulnerability​

• Details: Improper authentication permits an unauthorized attacker on the local network to spoof another account in Defender for Identity.
• Risk: Any unauthenticated attacker with LAN access could escalate their privileges or mask activities.
• Discovery credited to: Joshua Murrell (NetSPI).
• Recommendations: This flaw is particularly significant for enterprise and hybrid cloud networks where Defender for Identity (formerly Azure Advanced Threat Protection) is used as a security cornerstone.

CVE-2025-32702: Visual Studio Remote Code Execution​

• Details: A command injection risk in Visual Studio’s handling of special elements, allowing unauthenticated local attackers to execute code.
• Risk: Developers or build processes might be susceptible if malicious code is introduced. While exploitation details remain private, this underscores the importance of securing developer toolchains—a common vector for sophisticated supply chain attacks.

Patterns and Trends: Five Critical Takeaways​

1. Focus on Local Privilege Escalation​

A notable trend in this month’s advisories is the recurrence of elevation of privilege vulnerabilities—four out of five actively exploited zero-days fit this category. Once an attacker gains a foothold (often through phishing, malicious downloads, or weak credentials), these flaws offer a pathway to complete system takeover.

2. Continued Pressure on Core Windows Subsystems​

Key Windows components are perennial attack targets, with the DWM, CLFS, and AFD drivers all returning as subjects of critical security flaws. The lack of details about exploitation mechanics may reflect either the ongoing efforts of sophisticated threat actors or Microsoft’s strategic communications calculus.

3. Broader Security Landscape Impacts​

Patch Tuesday’s significance extends beyond Microsoft. The same week, other vendors—including Adobe, SAP, and Cisco—released their own security updates, reflecting an industry-wide sprint to get ahead of cascading vulnerabilities. Organizations that neglect holistic, cross-vendor patching strategies risk falling behind in the defense race.

4. Defense-in-Depth Is No Longer Optional​

The remote code execution flaw in the Scripting Engine (CVE-2025-30397) serves as a stark warning. Despite layered browser and endpoint protection, successful phishing or drive-by download attacks can still lead to compromise—especially when zero-day exploits are in play.

5. Attribution and Transparency​

While Microsoft consistently credits external researchers and partners, select vulnerabilities still list disclosures as "Anonymous" or provide sparse attack telemetry. Transparency is improving, but timely, actionable intelligence remains an area for incremental gains, particularly for defenders requiring detailed indicators of compromise (IOCs).

Strengths of Microsoft’s Patch Tuesday Model​

• Predictability and Reliability: Administrators can plan regular maintenance windows, reducing downtime and risk.
• Coordination with Third-Party Researchers: Many of the patched flaws are credited to independent security experts or threat intelligence teams, highlighting collaborative vigilance.
• Swift Turnaround for Actively Exploited Flaws: Zero-days, particularly those under active exploitation, tend to be patched with urgency, limiting potential "dwell time" for attackers.
• Clear Prioritization: Microsoft’s advisories rank updates by severity and exploitation likelihood, aiding IT teams in triage and risk assessment.

Potential Risks and Pitfalls​

• Patch Gaps: Exclusion of Azure, Mariner, and Edge vulnerabilities from main Patch Tuesday advisories can result in oversight, especially within hybrid or multi-cloud configurations.
• Complex Update Logistics: Large organizations dependent on legacy systems or intricate software deployments may experience patch fatigue. The sheer volume of updates—spanning core drivers, scripting engines, and identity platforms—presents challenges for timely, holistic deployment.
• Short Disclosure-to-Patch Gaps: Public disclosure, especially of "spoofing" or RCE vulnerabilities, may embolden attackers to craft exploits targeting laggard organizations slow to patch.
• Insufficient In-The-Wild Details: While Microsoft confirms certain flaws were exploited, absent technical analyses or exploit indicators limit defenders' capacity to hunt for historical compromise or ongoing lateral movement.

Action Steps for Windows Administrators​

Prioritizing the May 2025 Patch Tuesday​

• Immediate Patch Rollout: Prioritize endpoints and servers for updates relating to the five actively exploited zero-days, especially those exposed to remote access or untrusted user activity.
• Review Vulnerability Applicability: Not all patched flaws are relevant to every environment; leverage Microsoft’s official Security Update Guide to assess exposure.
• Test in Staging Environments: Apply security updates in test sandboxes to ensure compatibility, particularly for mission-critical applications.
• Enhance Threat Detection: Use updated IOCs and behavioral analytics to monitor for signs of attempted exploitation—even post-patch.
• User Education: Remind users and developers about the risk of clicking untrusted links or opening attachments, especially with the scripting engine RCE still actively targeted by phishing.

Broader Industry Implications​

May 2025’s Patch Tuesday highlights not just Microsoft’s ongoing patch cycle efficacy, but the intensity and ubiquity of cyber threats faced by Windows users everywhere. With each round of exploits—whether in the core DWM subsystem, CLFS drivers, or the Scripting Engine—attackers reinforce the necessity for rapid, coordinated defense. The cycle of public disclosure, patch release, and exploit adaptation is relentless.
CISO and enterprise IT teams must move beyond basic patch application. Proactive threat hunting, rigorous segmentation, privileged access management, and robust endpoint detection and response (EDR) are now baseline requirements—not luxuries. Furthermore, vendors and customers alike must demand greater transparency into both the mechanics and impact of each disclosed vulnerability, especially those discovered under active assault.

Predictions and Looking Ahead​

If trends hold, the remainder of 2025 will see Windows continue to bear the brunt of sophisticated, highly targeted attacks. Given the elevated value of privilege escalation and remote code execution flaws, defenders should expect fresh attempts to chain zero-days across subsystems and third-party tools.
Adaptive patch strategies—coupled with real-time threat intelligence and persistent user awareness—are the only plausible defense against the ever-quickening cadence of high-impact vulnerabilities.

Conclusion​

The May 2025 Patch Tuesday stands as both achievement and admonition. Microsoft has successfully closed multiple serious attack pathways—some which were already in active use by sophisticated adversaries. Yet the scope, technical sophistication, and speed of disclosure-to-exploitation cycles underscore the fragility of even the most mature security ecosystems.
For Windows environments of all sizes, timely patch application remains mission-critical. But it is no longer sufficient on its own. Only by pairing fast, comprehensive update deployment with layered detection, network isolation, and industry collaboration will organizations keep pace with the emerging threats signaled by every round of Patch Tuesday disclosures.
Windows administrators—and the security community at large—are reminded that vigilance, not complacency, is the currency of continued safety. With each Patch Tuesday, the battle continues. The cost of slipping behind has never been higher.

---

Source: BleepingComputer Microsoft May 2025 Patch Tuesday fixes 5 exploited zero-days, 72 flaws