Windows 10 End of Support 2025: Key Differences Between Windows 10 and Windows 11

As Microsoft steadily marches toward the sunset of Windows 10, with its mainstream support ending on October 14, 2025, millions of users face a consequential crossroads: accept the invitation to upgrade to Windows 11 or cling to the familiar comforts—and quirks—of an aging but beloved operating system. This transition, encouraged by both hard deadlines and subtle nudges in Microsoft's ecosystem, has reignited debates about what truly differentiates the two platforms in meaningful, everyday use. While cosmetic upgrades and under-the-hood improvements have been lauded and criticized in equal measure, only a handful of core differences have a daily impact for mainstream users and power users alike.

The Looming End of Windows 10—and a Reprieve for Some​

The conclusion of mainstream support for Windows 10 is far from trivial. Starting October 14, 2025, Microsoft will officially cease providing feature updates, bug fixes, and—crucially—security patches for the vast majority of users. This ticking clock, designed to accelerate adoption of Windows 11, leaves organizations and consumers alike weighing their options. Yet, Microsoft recently surprised the community by offering an unexpected olive branch: one additional year of free security updates for users who sign in with a Microsoft Account and sync their data via the Windows Backup app. Traditionally, the Extended Security Updates (ESU) program has been a paid lifeline for those unable, or unwilling, to migrate. Now, for a subset of Windows 10 holdouts, basic protection continues—albeit with limitations, as this only applies to security patches, not bug fixes or new features.
It's a nuanced extension—one that offers welcome breathing room for those on hardware ineligible for Windows 11 or for organizations struggling with the logistics of mass deployment. But Microsoft’s fine print is clear: this is a temporary stay, not a long-term solution. Eventually, support will fade, and full parity with Windows 11 users will become impossible.

Difference 1: Visual Consistency and the Modern Windows Look​

Perhaps the most immediate, visceral difference between Windows 10 and 11 lies in their visual design. While Windows 10 bears the marks of compromise—patching together remnants of Windows 7, the radicalism of Windows 8, and the transitional Fluent Design language—its interface lacks a coherent visual identity. In practice, users bounce between sharply squared corners, flat tiles, and classic applets. Making matters more complicated, legacy control panels and dialog boxes from earlier Windows versions remain scattered throughout, revealing the seams beneath the facelift.
Windows 11 seeks to rectify this with what Microsoft dubs “Fluent 2 Design”—a design ethos centered on simplicity, coherence, and approachability. Rounded corners, bolder accent colors, and more fluid animations run throughout both system and apps. Window shadows, micro-interactions, and updated icons add polish. The Start menu floats, shorn of live tiles, while the system tray, notification center, and quick settings panel harmonize into a more modern whole.
This leap forward is tangible the moment you begin using Windows 11, and for many users, it’s a refreshing change after years of visual fragmentation. However, legacy elements do remain below the surface, accessible in deeply nested settings and less-frequently updated system tools. While Windows 11 does not achieve perfect unity, it comes meaningfully closer than any version since Windows 7, and provides a user experience that feels not just incrementally newer, but fundamentally modern.
Strengths of Windows 11’s Design Overhaul:

• Aesthetic Cohesion: Consistent rounded corners, animations, and iconography across desktop and apps.
• Refined Start Menu: Simplified and customizable, moving away from Windows 10’s controversial live tiles.
• Touch-friendly Improvements: UI elements now scale and adapt more intuitively for touch devices.

Risks and Drawbacks:

• Incomplete Modernization: Legacy controls and system dialogs still surface, especially for advanced settings.
• Learning Curve: Users accustomed to legacy layouts may require time to acclimate to new navigation patterns.
• Performance on Older Hardware: The visually richer interface can be less responsive on unsupported or aging devices.

This new design approach is not just window dressing—it signals Microsoft's commitment to reintegrate Windows’ sprawling visual landscape. Yet, full unification remains a work in progress. For users who value a harmonious and up-to-date look, this alone can tip the scales in favor of Windows 11.

Difference 2: Taskbar and Start Menu Customization—A Step Forward or Back?​

For power users and loyalists, Windows’ taskbar and Start menu have long been centers of productivity and customization. Windows 10 offered broad flexibility: users could resize the Start menu, relocate the taskbar (left, right, top, or bottom), activate compact taskbar mode, and enable various display and notification options. These features, though niche, are nontrivial for users who have tailored their workflows over years—especially within corporate and multi-monitor environments.
Windows 11 rewrites the playbook, both technically and philosophically. The new system taskbar, rebuilt with modern code for stability and future expansion, jettisons some legacy features in the pursuit of simplicity and elegance. Notably, users are no longer able to reposition the taskbar to the sides or top of the screen—a limitation that has sparked widespread frustration among long-term Windows devotees. The Start menu, too, trades flexibility for clarity: no more live tiles, reduced resizing options, and an overall shift in how information and apps are presented.
Key Customization Features Lost in Windows 11 (as of 2025):

• Taskbar Relocation: Forced dock at the bottom of the screen; sides and top not supported.
• Compact Taskbar Mode: No smaller option for maximizing screen real estate.
• Resizable Start Menu: Fixed dimensions with less granular control.
• Peek on Hover: No quick desktop preview by hovering over the Show Desktop button.
• Agenda View and Battery Features: The calendar and battery flyouts lose user-configurable modes and real-time controls.

For users who depended on these features—such as those with ultrawide monitors, accessibility needs, or high-efficiency workflows—this represents more than a cosmetic change. It’s a real alteration to how Windows can be made to fit individual preferences.
Microsoft has defended these decisions by referencing user data, security, and the limitations of legacy technical debt. The rebuilt taskbar theoretically paves the way for more stable, future-proof enhancements. Yet, after three years of feedback, many features remain missing, undermining claims of user-inspired progress. Community sentiment, as expressed across support forums, Reddit, and Windows’ own Feedback Hub, remains sharply divided.
Strengths of the New Approach:

• Stability and Modernization: The rebuilt taskbar is less prone to bugs and graphical glitches.
• Potential for Future Expansion: A solid technical foundation could support new features—if Microsoft chooses to deliver them.
• Cleaner Aesthetic: Reduced visual clutter fits well with Windows 11’s streamlined ethos.

Risks and Drawbacks:

• Loss of User Control: Customization options that formed part of many users’ daily workflow are gone.
• Power User Alienation: Dedicated users who value advanced tweaking options feel sidelined.
• Inertia in Feature Restoration: Microsoft has yet to restore these capabilities, despite vocal requests.

For organizations or users on the fence, this area alone may justify delaying an upgrade, especially if established workflow efficiencies hang in the balance.

Difference 3: The Fate of Tablet Mode and Touch Experience​

Tablet Mode—the feature introduced in Windows 10 to optimize the interface for convertibles and touch-first devices—has been quietly retired in Windows 11. Windows 10’s version allowed seamless toggling between classic desktop and tablet-optimized environments. On 2-in-1 devices, removing the keyboard triggered automatic switching: the Start menu would expand to fill the screen, apps defaulted to full screen, and touch-friendly gestures became prominent. It was, in many respects, a successful maturation of the infamous Windows 8 Metro UI, finally balancing productivity and touch usability.
In Windows 11, there is no dedicated Tablet Mode. Instead, the OS adopts a “blended” model: touch features are incorporated more holistically throughout the UI, rather than activated by a mode switch. Key additions include a dynamically resizing taskbar, new three- and four-finger gestures for invoking system commands, and context menus with more generous touch targets. But the signature full-screen, app-centric tablet interface is gone, as are the system-level touch optimizations that accompanied it.
What’s Lost With Tablet Mode’s Removal:

• Full-screen Start Menu: No more immersive app launcher optimized for touch interaction.
• Quick Touch Gestures: Missing some of the swiping and split-screen gestures for multitasking.
• Automatic UI Customization: No easy, system-wide toggle based on device posture or mode.

What’s Retained and Enhanced:

• Robust Window Snap Features: Snap layouts and groups work with touch as well as mouse/keyboard, making multitasking easier.
• Gesture Navigation: Swiping up or in from screen edges triggers key UI elements, though not as fully-featured as Tablet Mode’s suite.
• Adaptive UI Elements: Touch users benefit from auto-expanded hitboxes, better spacing, and larger controls when input is detected.

Microsoft’s rationale is that fewer users actively engaged with Tablet Mode than anticipated, and that folding its best features into the core environment better serves both laptop and hybrid device owners. This approach arguably fits the Surface Pro’s ongoing evolution—as a productivity-forward device that can nonetheless be used as a tablet. Yet, for artists, students, or anyone who prized the full-screen, app-launcher-focused alternative, Windows 11’s blend feels incomplete.
Strengths:

• Unified Experience: No more abrupt context switches or confusion about which mode is active.
• Improved Touch Integration: Touch is treated as a first-class input type throughout the OS, not a feature add-on.
• Enhanced Snap and Multitasking: Users can more easily split and manage windows even on touchscreens.

Risks and Drawbacks:

• Reduced Customization for Tablets: True tablet-first workflows, particularly those built around Windows 10’s “mode switch,” are less supported.
• Loss of Familiarity for Some Users: Transitioning from app-centric tablet mode may introduce friction for those accustomed to the old approach.

For a segment of users—especially in education or field work—the absence of Tablet Mode will be keenly felt, raising real questions about Windows’ aspirations as a cross-device platform.

Security, Compatibility, and Final Considerations​

Beyond these headline differences, Windows 11 brings other evolutionary changes—some welcome, some controversial. Security is a major focus: Windows 11 makes hardware-based protections (like TPM 2.0 and Secure Boot) mandatory for installation, raising the floor for device integrity but potentially leaving older hardware behind. Compatibility with new software and hardware is also gradually drifting, as more ISVs and OEMs drop Windows 10 support beginning in late 2025. At the same time, Windows 11 maintains strong backward compatibility, albeit sometimes mediated by emulation or compatibility layers.
Security Enhancements:

• Mandatory Secure Boot and TPM: Mitigates boot-level malware and firmware attacks.
• Virtualization-based Security (VBS) On By Default: Secures critical system processes.
• Smart App Control: New features to block untrusted or unsigned applications.

Potential Risks:

• Increased Hardware Requirements: PCs lacking certain security modules (TPM 2.0, UEFI) are excluded, frustrating owners of otherwise capable systems.
• Long-term App Compatibility: As the Windows 10 codebase ages, software vendors will deprioritize backports and patching.

The extended free security update offer for Windows 10 users (who sync via Windows Backup app) helps ease the pressure, but it’s a stopgap measure. Over time, the security gulf will only widen.

The Bottom Line: Should You Move On?​

When it comes to Windows 10 vs Windows 11, only a handful of differences will truly affect the daily lives of most users. Windows 11’s refined design, streamlined (yet more restrictive) taskbar and Start menu, and the loss of distinct Tablet Mode constitute material shifts in user experience. Underneath, new security baselines and evolving third-party support will increasingly favor Windows 11—especially as the post-2025 landscape matures.
Reasons to Upgrade Sooner:

• Access to new visual features and a more cohesive interface.
• Futureproofing on the security and compatibility front.
• Improved touch integration and enhanced multitasking for hybrid devices.

Reasons to Wait (or Hold Out):

• Need for legacy taskbar/Start menu customization.
• Dependence on Tablet Mode for daily use.
• Sufficient security, for now, with Microsoft’s extended update offer.

For the vast majority, Windows 11’s differences are more than skin deep—but whether those changes are an upgrade or a setback depends on your workflow, hardware, and personal preference. As Windows 10’s end of mainstream support draws near, the choice may not be entirely yours for much longer. Either way, understanding which differences matter, and why, is key to making the transition on your own terms.

---

Source: Pocket-lint Windows 10 vs 11: 3 differences that actually matter