Windows 10 End of Support: Challenges, Risks, and Environmental Impact

As Microsoft approaches the end-of-support date for Windows 10, a wave of controversy has engulfed the tech giant’s latest decisions regarding extended security for older PCs. Despite a recent move to offer free Extended Security Updates (ESU) to Windows 10 users—alongside traditional paid options—critics argue that the measure is little more than a stopgap against a looming wave of computer obsolescence. The claims are stark: as many as 400 million Windows 10 devices around the globe could soon find themselves unsupported, fueling what might be the largest surge of electronic waste in computing history.

The End of the Windows 10 Era​

After a decade of dominance, Windows 10 is set to lose mainstream support in 2025—a transition made more turbulent by the rigid hardware requirements of Windows 11. Over the past year, Microsoft has repeatedly urged users to move to Windows 11, touting improved security architecture, enhanced performance, and modernized features. For users—especially those on older hardware—this transition is far from seamless.
KB5001716, a recent update surreptitiously pushed on both Windows 10 and Windows 11 systems, serves as a stark reminder. Its aim: to nudge users towards adopting a new feature update, or ultimately, a new OS. As the last such update before Windows 10’s October sunset, its release signals Microsoft’s final transition push.
But what happens to those who cannot—or will not—upgrade?

Microsoft’s ESU Gambit: Not Quite a Lifeline​

In a bid to soften the blow, Microsoft introduced its ESU program, originally requiring a $30 annual payment for continued security updates on Windows 10 beyond its official end-of-life. However, in response to mounting criticism from consumer groups and governments, Microsoft quietly expanded eligibility. Now, users can access the ESU for free through two alternative routes: redeeming 1,000 Microsoft Rewards points or using the Windows Backup app to sync their system settings. This concession effectively extends security coverage to October 2026—for at least another year—for those who act.
Yet, this offer comes with significant caveats. While the paid route remains, the alternatives require users to engage in Microsoft’s broader ecosystem—whether by engaging with Bing and other Microsoft services to earn reward points or integrating with cloud-connected backup utilities. Critics claim this strategy incentivizes deeper Microsoft account entanglement, trading privacy and engagement for security patches.

The 400 Million PC Problem: Measuring the Cliff​

The most damning critique comes from the Public Interest Research Group (PIRG), which has accused Microsoft of applying a mere “band-aid” to an impending crisis. Citing their own research (originally published before the ESU expansion), PIRG asserts that when official support ends, up to 400 million “perfectly good” computers will become obsolete—not due to technical failure, but Microsoft’s stringent Windows 11 requirements.
As PIRG wrote: “When free support for Windows 10 ends in 2025, as many as 400 million perfectly good computers that can’t upgrade to Windows 11 will be thrown out. This could be the single biggest jump in junked computers ever… About 40% of PCs currently in use can’t upgrade to Windows 11, even if users want to.”
Subsequent statements following Microsoft’s free ESU announcement were equally scathing: “Microsoft's new options don't go far enough and likely won't make a dent in the up to 400 million Windows 10 PCs that can't upgrade to Windows 11.”
But the true scale of the problem is up for debate. Research firm Canalys places the number closer to 240 million potentially stranded devices. Meanwhile, ControlUp—a digital workspace analytics provider—offered a detailed breakdown: in their analysis of over a million enterprise PCs, about 12% were incapable of upgrading to Windows 11. Extrapolated, that would mean roughly 120 million devices worldwide in businesses alone face end-of-support exposure. The underlying message is consistent: millions of PCs, still functional, are nearing a security precipice.

Markets, Security, and the Environmental Toll​

Microsoft has long argued that Windows 11’s hardware requirements, notably its reliance on TPM 2.0 and newer processors, are essential for defending against modern threats. Features such as Virtualization-Based Security (VBS), Secure Boot, and hardware-enforced stack protection all require infrastructure unavailable on many older devices.
From a security standpoint, this is compelling. As ransomware, firmware attacks, and zero-day exploits proliferate, older hardware’s inability to run these defenses poses systemic risks to networks and end users. Yet, blanketly locking out capable hardware raises tough questions about balance—especially in light of the economic and environmental costs.
The environmental impact is particularly acute. According to PIRG and corroborated by research from the United Nations Environment Programme, e-waste is already a mounting global crisis, with billions of pounds generated each year. Forcing the early retirement of hundreds of millions of devices compounds the problem—especially in regions where safe recycling infrastructure is lacking.
Many consumer advocates, ranging from PIRG to European digital rights organizations, have called on Microsoft to:

• Further extend Windows 10 security updates, especially for older, perfectly usable hardware.
• Support open-source and community-driven security patch projects (as some legacy OS communities have done for Windows XP and Windows 7).
• Loosen Windows 11 hardware requirements, or enable “unsupported” upgrades with official limited support disclaimers.

At present, Microsoft’s stance has been firm: security and reliability above all.

Enterprise and Consumer Strategy: Navigating the Fork​

The transition to Windows 11 has proven far less traumatic for large enterprises than the consumer segment. ControlUp’s survey of over one million endpoints indicates a significant migration is already underway, driven by IT department imperatives and extended service contracts. Microsoft itself offers specialized ESU plans and in-depth transition support for commercial partners, softening the blow of forced upgrades or hardware refresh cycles.
Consumers, small businesses, educational institutions, and NGOs, however, are more vulnerable. The ESU program’s shift from paid to partly free is a notable gesture, aimed at slower-moving segments. The caveats, however, remain stark:

• Free ESU enrollment options depend on participation in closed Microsoft ecosystems, potentially leveraging data and behavioral insights.
• ESU support only delays the inevitable; the security cliff now hits in 2026, not 2025.
• Users must proactively activate the ESU—a step many less technical individuals may miss, leaving them exposed in the end.

Critical Analysis: Assessing Risks and Merits​

Strengths of the Current Approach​

• Security Focus: Microsoft’s relentless emphasis on security through Windows 11 is not merely marketing. Independent cybersecurity analyses, such as those published by Secureworks and the SANS Institute, confirm that attacker sophistication has outpaced the defensive capabilities of legacy operating systems. Hardware root-of-trust, memory integrity, and virtual containerization measurably reduce real-world risk.
• Cloud Integration: The transition aligns with broader Microsoft goals towards cloud-centric computing, reflecting where the industry—and attacker playbooks—are moving.
• Support for Enterprises: By providing a relatively seamless upgrade path and flexible ESU for businesses, Microsoft avoids the catastrophic disruptions seen at end-of-support moments for older Windows versions like XP and 7.

Weaknesses and Pitfalls​

• Digital Exclusion: The inability to upgrade older hardware risks marginalizing users in developing markets, the elderly, educational institutions, and lower-income households. Computers rendered insecure become, de facto, unusable for sensitive tasks.
• E-Waste Surge: Unless robust recycling and reuse programs are implemented, the spike in obsolescence will exacerbate a mounting environmental disaster.
• Opaque Communication: The reliance on KB push updates and opt-in ESU enrollment means less-savvy users are likely to miss critical security extensions. Clearer, more broadly publicized guidance is essential.
• Privacy Trade-Offs: The “free” ESU options are not truly costless for privacy-conscious users, as they often require deeper Microsoft account integration and data sharing.

The Broader Technology Perspective​

These dynamics reflect longstanding tensions in the technology sector: balancing genuine advances in security and user experience with social, environmental, and ethical responsibilities. Microsoft is hardly alone; Apple, Google, and hardware OEMs routinely end support for aging devices—sometimes to similar criticism.
Yet, scale matters. With a Windows installed base measured in the hundreds of millions, the ripples are global and immediate.

Alternative Paths Forward​

The reaction to Microsoft’s ESU maneuvering has ignited calls for new strategies:

• Community Security Patch Initiatives: Mirroring unofficial Windows XP or Windows 7 patching projects, community-led security efforts could mitigate risks for abandoned hardware, though official support would lend vital legitimacy.
• Selective Softening of Requirements: Enabling unsupported Windows 11 installs—perhaps with explicit “at your own risk” disclaimers—would allow tech-savvy users to extend device lifespans.
• Hybrid Support Models: Governments could fund or mandate extended support for critical digital infrastructure (schools, public services) currently unsupported by either Microsoft’s offer or hardware constraints.

The Road Ahead for Windows Users​

For now, the immediate advice to Windows 10 users is clear:

• Investigate and, where appropriate, activate the ESU through one of Microsoft’s three mechanisms (payment, rewards points, or Windows Backup integration).
• Organizations with significant unsupported fleets should urgently assess hardware upgrade pathways, risk tolerance, and potential for negotiation with Microsoft for bulk ESU arrangements.
• Consumers and small businesses need clear communication and guidance to avoid falling off the support cliff come 2026, if not before.

As for the “400 million” figure—it remains contested, but even the most conservative estimates reflect a once-in-a-generation mass migration (or abandonment) scenario. Microsoft’s attempt to ease the transition deserves measured praise for flexibility and responsiveness, but critics are right: more needs to be done to avert a crisis in digital inclusion and environmental sustainability.

Final Thoughts: Windows at a Crossroads​

The story of Windows 10’s end of support is not just about one operating system but about the future trajectory of consumer computing. As cloud services, next-gen security, and hardware innovation accelerate, millions remain at risk of being left behind—not through any fault of their own but through the relentless churn of planned obsolescence.
For Microsoft, the rollout of the ESU—free and paid—reflects both the power and perils of platform dominance. In its hands lies the delicate balance between progress and responsibility, innovation and stewardship.
Users, meanwhile, must navigate a complex set of choices. For some, upgrading is an opportunity; for others, it’s an existential threat to continued digital participation. How Microsoft responds in the critical months ahead will determine its legacy—not just for Windows 10, but for the millions worldwide who depend daily on their PC to work, learn, create, and connect.

---

Source: Neowin Microsoft gets pummeled as Windows 10 'free' extended support won't save "400 million" PCs