Windows 7 OEM price even cheaper if you get Vista Upgrade first

[News]

By Scott M. Fulton, III, Betanews

Windows 7 OEM prices compared to Windows Vista

Windows 7 SKU Full retail MSRP 3 OEM full install MSRP Comparable Vista SKU Full retail MSRP OEM full install MSRP Home Premium $199.99 $99.99 1 Home Premium $224.99 $89.99 2 Professional $299.99 $134.99 1 Business $278.99 $149.99 2 Ultimate $319.99 $174.99 1 Ultimate $289.99 $179.99 (32-bit) / $189.99 (64-bit) 2

1 Limited offer, expected to end October 20.

2 Comes with free Tech Guarantee Windows 7 upgrade coupon.

3 MSRP from Microsoft for sale October 22, pre-order prices may be lower.

As quoted by Newegg.com, September 29, 2009, 11:30 am EDT​

​

A little over three weeks until global availability (GA) day for Windows 7, major software retailers have heavily discounted pre-orders for the OEM full-installation editions (minimal packaging), with Newegg offering the Home Premium SKU at $99.99. That's half the price of the MSRP for the full retail edition, and four cents more than a retail upgrade package.

But that's still not the least expensive option. For an indeterminate period of time, Newegg has slashed $20 off the OEM price of the Vista Home Premium SKU, marking it down to $89.99 and leaving the free Windows 7 Tech Guarantee upgrade coupon attached. It's a little less convenient, you're stuck with a copy of Vista you may never use, and your Windows 7 version is an upgrade rather than a full install, but you save ten bucks. In fact, the version without the Tech Guarantee coupon is $10 more; you would actually spend more money not to get the Win7 upgrade coupon.

Newegg today is also offering deals on the Professional and Ultimate SKUs, though for them, it's cheaper to go with the Windows 7 full-install OEM than with the comparable Vista version with upgrade coupon. A single license for the Win7 Professional SKU saves as much as $15 over the comparable Vista version, and Win7 Ultimate OEM will save you $5 over the comparable 32-bit edition, $15 over the 64-bit.

Curiously, the deals for single-license packages are better than for multiples today, as a three-pack Win7 Ultimate OEM runs $549.99, a three-pack Win7 Professional runs $409.99, and a three-pack Win7 Home Premium is priced at $349.99.

As we've mentioned here in Betanews before, a migration from Windows XP to Windows 7 is not altogether impossible, though it requires migrating through Vista first. There are definitely headaches involved, and many professionals suggest that those headaches can be avoided by either cleanly installing Windows 7 with a full install version, or create multiple boot partitions and place a clean Win7 in a new one alongside the older XP partition. As of now, the price for avoiding these headaches and reclaiming several lost hours -- at least for Home Premium installers -- is merely ten bucks.

Copyright Betanews, Inc. 2009

Link Removed - Invalid URL Link Removed - Invalid URL Link Removed - Invalid URL Link Removed - Invalid URL Link Removed - Invalid URL Link Removed - Invalid URL Link Removed - Invalid URL
Link Removed - Invalid URL

Link Removed due to 404 Error

More...

 

[fjgold]

Nice, I've been waiting on the OEM pricing for awhile now as my intention is to purchase the Win 7 Home Premium OEM version.
I'll take $100.00 of the full retail anyday. I plan on only using it on my only computer, a notebook, so the limitations inherent
in OEM versions of an OS are irelevant to me.
It surprises me that the deal only includes the 32 bit version however.
No issue as I had planned on installing the 32 bit version anyway.
My experience with both 32 bit and 64 bit versions of Ubuntu 8.04 and Ubuntu 8.10 lead me to believe there is little practical difference anyway.

Of course I suppose at the price savings of the OEM version I could afford to buy the 64 bit version also.
It might make a good project to do a multiboot of both versions to see if I notice a difference.

The big selling point for me would be the 4 GB ram limitation issue.
I have 4 GB installed and both 32 bit and 64 bit OS's only use 3 GB.
This is because my chipset doesn't support more than 4 GB even though my Intel Merom processor is 64 bit
capable.

This is the probable reason I don't see a big performance difference.

64 bit does take up more HDD space however.

When all is said and done I'll probably end up buying the 32 bit version and be very happy with it.
I could use the saving to help get something else, like maybe a new 500 GB Seagate Momentus 7200.4 2.5" HDD.