📎 AI Summary:
The thread discusses the potential RTM release of Windows 7, with initial excitement expressed after WZOR reported it as signed off. Several users share their own experiences with installing builds like 16384 and 16385, while some remain skeptical about the authenticity of the leak, emphasizing that official confirmation from Microsoft is still awaited. Overall, the sentiment is cautious, with a mix of excitement and skepticism regarding the leak and its legitimacy.
The thread discusses the potential RTM release of Windows 7, with initial excitement expressed after WZOR reported it as signed off. Several users share their own experiences with installing builds like 16384 and 16385, while some remain skeptical about the authenticity of the leak, emphasizing that official confirmation from Microsoft is still awaited. Overall, the sentiment is cautious, with a mix of excitement and skepticism regarding the leak and its legitimacy.
Solution
loathe
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2009
- Messages
- 1,717
UPDATE
The install.wim hashes match with the untouched OEM iso from Microsoft. This means that WZors iso is in fact the same thing from Microsoft. You can not modifiy this file and have the same hash values. In short if you are WZors iso you have nothing to worry about you have the real deal.
loathe
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2009
- Messages
- 1,717
Would somebody who has downloaded the TechNet copy of x64 please take the time to post a screen shot of the install.wim file in the iso for me. I would just like to confirm this once and for all. Let me know if you need some help with this. Thanks
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2005
- Messages
- 9,260
TechNet download is very slow. This is exciting, can someone confirm 3758 was the final build? My worry is that the leaked version was a checked build (some debug code enabled). Looks like I will probably re-install for the most part...
sm0ke42o
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2009
- Messages
- 76
sm0ke42o
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2009
- Messages
- 76
@ Greg
Correct me if I am wrong but I think that Drew got his via the Microsoft Connect Beta program and not MSDN.
Also a technet subscription is only $260 after tax right now and I think only differs from MSDN in that you cant use the software in a production environment and only for evaluation purposes. So unless you need to use it at work for development, then technet would be just fine.
Correct me if I am wrong but I think that Drew got his via the Microsoft Connect Beta program and not MSDN.
Also a technet subscription is only $260 after tax right now and I think only differs from MSDN in that you cant use the software in a production environment and only for evaluation purposes. So unless you need to use it at work for development, then technet would be just fine.
Last edited:
Similar threads
- Article
- Article