📎 AI Summary:
The original poster is inquiring whether they need Client Access Licenses (CALs) for a Windows Server 2016 Standard used mainly for file sharing and FileMaker with multiple user accounts but no direct server connections. A respondent confirms that CALs are required for both direct and indirect access, such as file sharing or RDP. The discussion concludes with the original poster thanking the contributor, indicating they understand the licensing requirement.

mehcoib

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
2
Thread Author #1
Hi,

We have a Windows Server 2016 Standard still in trial (a few days left) and I'm wondering if we need CAL for what we do with that server.

We need Windows Server because of FileMaker Server, but no one is directly connected to the server. It's used for file sharing and FileMaker. There's 3 differents user accounts available. Some PCs use user account 1, some use user account 2, etc.

It's working like a charm in trial version but will we need CAL after purchasing a basic Windows Server 2016 Standard licence?

Thanks for your help.
 

Solution
Yes you would need CALs. A CAL is required to access a server directly (RDP for example) or indirectly (accessing the file system or an application hosted on the server)

Neemobeer

Windows Forum Team
Staff member
Joined
Jul 4, 2015
Messages
8,995
Yes you would need CALs. A CAL is required to access a server directly (RDP for example) or indirectly (accessing the file system or an application hosted on the server)
 

Solution

mehcoib

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
2
Thread Author #3
thank you