📎 AI Summary:
The thread discusses expanding a RAID 1 mirror by adding more hard drives, with advice suggesting that while it is possible to add more disks to the mirror, using RAID 5 or RAID 10 would be more efficient for increased storage or performance. The original poster confirms they are using RAID 1 for disk mirroring. Other contributors recommend RAID 5 or RAID 10 for better redundancy and performance benefits. Overall, the discussion highlights options for expanding or optimizing RAID configurations on Windows systems.

Devilstompa

New Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2019
Messages
21
Thread Author #1
Hello I just recently mirrored 2 4tb hdds. If I where to add 2 more hdds to the mirror would that work ? Just trying to understand how to do that. Thanks
 

Solution
You could but all you get is more redundancy. A RAID 5 would be better (get you more storage) or since you have 4 drives if supported I would do a RAID 10 which is really just a RAID 1 + 0 which means you mirror pairs of disks and then strip them. This get's you the same mirroring redundancy and about 4 x read/write speeds.

livix07

Honorable Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2018
Messages
585
Yes, it should work but if you want to use more than 2 disks you should rather use RAID 5 or 6 (more efficient), not RAID 1.
You can watch these video tutorials about RAID:




What RAID did you use for mirroring?
 

Devilstompa

New Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2019
Messages
21
Thread Author #3
Yes, it should work but if you want to use more than 2 disks you should rather use RAID 5 or 6 (more efficient), not RAID 1.
You can watch these video tutorials about RAID:




What RAID did you use for mirroring?

I used Raid 1 for the disk mirroring.
 

Neemobeer

Windows Forum Team
Staff member
Joined
Jul 4, 2015
Messages
8,995
You could but all you get is more redundancy. A RAID 5 would be better (get you more storage) or since you have 4 drives if supported I would do a RAID 10 which is really just a RAID 1 + 0 which means you mirror pairs of disks and then strip them. This get's you the same mirroring redundancy and about 4 x read/write speeds.
 

Solution