• Thread Author
AMD's recent engineering notes and driver rollouts close several long-standing installation pain points for Windows users, but they also expose recurring process weaknesses that enthusiasts and IT pros should know before clicking "Install."

A futuristic PC motherboard with Ryzen CPU and Radeon GPU, overlaid by holographic install screen warning of data loss.Background​

Over the past two years, AMD has been rolling out iterative fixes across two broad software stacks: the Ryzen chipset drivers that tie AMD processors and motherboards to Windows, and the Radeon / AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition display stack for GPUs. Between stuck or frozen installers, progress bars that refuse to move, Windows Update overwriting newer GPU drivers with older cataloged versions, and — in rare but high-impact cases — driver installs that leave Windows unable to boot, those issues have become an operational headache for both casual PC owners and system administrators.
The company has published multiple chipset release notes that explicitly list both the fixes and the remaining known issues. Simultaneously, AMD issued advisories about a rare scenario where the display driver installer’s Factory Reset option can, under a specific concurrency condition with Windows Update, produce an “inaccessible boot device” situation. Recent driver releases also include targeted fixes for Windows Update interference — a welcome but narrow correction that still leaves open questions about upstream compatibility testing and distribution controls.
This feature examines the technical details of those problems, sums up what AMD has fixed in recent releases, lays out practical, validated workarounds for end users and IT teams, and offers a critical take on what AMD must do next to reduce risk and restore user confidence.

What went wrong: a catalogue of installation failures​

Windows Update vs. OEM driver delivery — a race condition​

A recurring theme is the interaction between Windows Update and AMD's installers. Windows Update can and does push driver packages via the Microsoft driver catalog. When a machine is updating in the background at the same time a user runs the AMD installer, two processes may try to install or register driver components concurrently. That overlap can produce:
  • A seemingly successful AMD install followed by Windows Update reverting the driver to an older, cataloged version.
  • Corrupted or mismatched driver store entries that confuse Windows’ boot integrity checks.
  • In a small subset of cases, a boot failure during the post-install reboot phase that results in inaccessible boot device errors.
That concurrency issue has been tracked publicly by AMD and covered by multiple hardware outlets. AMD’s pragmatic mitigation advice — pause system updates and avoid the installer’s Factory Reset option — is sensible, but it is a workaround rather than a root-cause fix.

Installer UI and progress bar stalls​

Chipset installers and the AMD Install Manager have shipped with an irritating UX bug: installation progress can appear to stall at 0% for extended periods. While the underlying installation may still be proceeding, the frozen progress bar leads many users to force-quit the installer — sometimes leaving the system in a semi-updated or inconsistent state.
This manifests most often during multi-component installs (chipset + PPKG + other runtime components) where the installer hands off to multiple sub-installers. The symptom is a visible UI hang even though background services continue. AMD has started listing and addressing these issues in release notes, sometimes marking them as “fixed” in subsequent chipset packages.

“AMD Chipset Software is not responding” dialog​

An annoying but relatively common problem reported on earlier chipset packages was a popup saying “AMD Chipset Software is not responding” when launching the installer and interacting with the UI. AMD now lists this specific failure as fixed in select chipset releases; the fix addresses the installer’s UI thread deadlock and some resource handling edge cases on non-English OS installations.

Factory Reset + Windows Update = rare but severe boot failure​

This is the most dramatic failure mode to surface: when users select the Factory Reset option inside the Radeon installer (which removes previous driver traces to force a clean install) and Windows Update simultaneously applies an OS-level update, it can produce a race condition that leaves Windows failing to validate boot drivers. The resulting error can make the OS unbootable, forcing recovery procedures or a full reinstall in the worst cases.
AMD verified and reproduced the scenario internally and has publicly advised users to leave the Factory Reset option unchecked and to pause Windows Update when installing Adrenalin until a definitive fix is delivered. This guidance is explicitly meant to prevent the rare but destructive outcome while engineering works the permanent solution.

What AMD has already fixed (verified)​

AMD's own chipset release notes and driver changelogs list several explicit mitigations and bug fixes across versions. Notable, verified items include:
  • A fix for the “AMD Chipset Software is not responding” installer dialog in specific Ryzen chipset release packages.
  • Release notes acknowledging and addressing progress bar stalls and occasional custom install failures.
  • Addition of program and hardware support (for example, Windows 11 24H2 support and new drivers on AM5/X670 platforms) while also noting persistent known issues on localization and uninstall reporting.
  • A display driver update that aims to remedy the instance where Windows Update reverted a newly installed Radeon driver to an older version for certain GPU families (initially focused on newer RX 9000-series cards).
These are selective examples of what AMD has changed; the specific driver and chipset package version numbers can be found in the official release notes packed with the installer downloads. The net result is measurable progress: many of the installer hangs and certain driver-store inconsistencies no longer appear on the same scale in up-to-date packages.

Practical, verified steps to avoid and recover from problems​

The following checklist is a pragmatic, field-tested set of steps for users and IT professionals to minimize risk during AMD driver or chipset installations. These are derived from AMD guidance and corroborated by independent technical coverage and community troubleshooting best practices.

Before installing any AMD driver or chipset package​

  • Pause Windows Update and other scheduled OS updates.
  • Disabling or pausing automatic updates prevents the concurrent-update race condition that can corrupt driver registration.
  • Uncheck the Factory Reset option in the AMD Adrenalin installer.
  • This avoids the specific risky path AMD has warned about until a permanent fix is shipped.
  • Create a recovery point or full backup (system image) before any major driver change.
  • System Restore or a disk image provides a fast recovery path if installation goes wrong.
  • If upgrading from significantly older drivers, run a clean driver removal tool (DDU — Display Driver Uninstaller) offline.
  • Running DDU in Safe Mode and with networking disabled prevents Windows Update from auto-pulling drivers during cleanup.
  • Ensure firmware and BIOS are current on the motherboard before a chipset driver update.
  • Chipset software and BIOS often interact; keeping both current reduces mismatched behaviors.

If an install stalls, hangs, or fails​

  • Do not immediately force-shutdown. Check Task Manager for installer subprocesses and allow time for background operations.
  • If an installer freezes and progress is stuck at 0%, wait 10–30 minutes (progress may be delayed due to background extraction or component registration).
  • If forced to terminate, reboot into Safe Mode and re-run a cleanup (DDU for display drivers, or AMD Cleanup Utility for AMD software).
  • For chipset installs that fail to upgrade, try running the installer from an elevated command prompt and allow the executable to run to completion; some community reports note that command-line installs complete cleanly where GUI flows stall.

Recovery from a boot failure after installation​

  • Attempt Windows Recovery -> System Restore to revert to a known good point.
  • Use Windows automatic repair tools; in many cases boot-record-level recovery will restore system integrity.
  • If recovery tools fail, a repair install of Windows (in-place upgrade/repair) typically restores bootability while preserving files.
  • As a last resort, full OS reinstall may be required — which is why pre-install backups are essential.

What AMD has published as tools and guidance​

AMD provides several utility and guidance resources that help users detect and resolve compatibility and installation problems:
  • AMD Cleanup Utility: Designed to remove remnants of older AMD drivers and ATI/AMD registry entries where DDU may not be available or desired.
  • AMD Software Compatibility Tool: Attempts to match AMD Software versions to the currently installed driver, mitigating incompatibility pop-ups and startup failures post-install.
  • Official package release notes and knowledge base articles that list known issues and identified workarounds (for example, guidance on Windows Device Installation Settings and how Windows Update can revert driver versions).
These utilities are useful but are not a substitute for careful operational discipline: pausing Windows Update, having backups, and avoiding risky installer options when warned are still recommended.

Strengths in AMD’s response​

  • AMD has been transparent in acknowledging the most severe failure mode and reproduced the Factory Reset + Windows Update scenario internally.
  • The company has moved rapidly to release chipset releases that fix specific installer UI hangs and to publish known-issue advisories while a full engineering fix is being developed.
  • AMD provides targeted mitigation tools (Cleanup Utility, Compatibility Tool) and explicit, actionable guidance — for instance, to pause Windows Update and to not use Factory Reset until corrected.
  • The ongoing release cadence shows AMD’s willingness to iterate quickly on installer behavior, driver signing (SHA256 updates for modern OS trust), and new platform support.
These steps reduce exposure for most users and indicate a prioritization of install reliability alongside feature drivers.

Residual risks and criticisms​

  • Workarounds versus fixes: Repeated reliance on "do not use Factory Reset" and "pause Windows Update" reads like an operational bandage rather than a systemic fix. Users should not have to disable key OS security/update features to apply device drivers safely.
  • Distribution control and Windows Update conflict: If the Microsoft catalog still holds older driver packages that can overwrite newer vendor-installed drivers, Microsoft and AMD need a more coordinated policy and compatibility testing model that prevents such regressions.
  • Installer robustness: Progress bar stalls, UI hangs, and recovery inconsistencies reveal gaps in integration testing — especially internationalization issues and non-English OS behaviors that remain flagged as known issues.
  • Communication clarity: While AMD has made statements, some of the more technical details (root-cause, timeline for permanent fix, and precise scope of affected GPUs/motherboards) remain vague in public notes — leaving users unsure whether their specific hardware is at risk.
  • QA on concurrent update scenarios: Concurrency is a well-known source of race conditions. Installers should be engineered to detect pending OS update actions and either queue or lock operations accordingly. That architectural change requires more effort but would substantially improve stability.

Recommendations for AMD, Microsoft, and OEMs​

The technical and operational fixes needed fall into three categories: short-term mitigations, medium-term architectural changes, and long-term process improvements.

For AMD (short to medium term)​

  • Build installer-side locking that detects pending Windows Update operations and blocks or postpones factory resets and driver replacements until the OS is in a stable state.
  • Add explicit preflight checks in the installer that warn users about pending reboots or active updates and refuse to run potentially destructive actions if the system is flagged.
  • Improve telemetry and crash reporting during installs to capture actionable data when installs fail — specifically, collect and analyze driver store transaction logs and installer handoff timings to isolate race conditions.
  • Better pre-release coordination with Microsoft to ensure that driver catalog entries and vendor-supplied packages don’t conflict during rollouts.

For Microsoft​

  • Provide clearer catalog controls to vendors so that a newer vendor-supplied driver can be marked as preferred over a catalog entry when appropriate.
  • Expose installer preflight APIs that allow third-party setups to detect Windows Update activity and request transient suppression of conflicting catalog installs during critical transactions.

For OEMs and system builders​

  • Integrate driver validation into factory firmware and pre-shipped images to reduce the likelihood of in-field mismatches.
  • Provide clear upgrade guidance in support portals, including explicit cautions about pausing Windows Update and documenting which driver versions are validated for a motherboard or laptop model.

How to judge whether you should update now​

Updating chipset and GPU drivers delivers security updates, performance tuning, and new feature support. But driver updates can also change system-level behavior. Use this decision matrix:
  • If you have a stable system and no compelling need (security, required game support, or hardware enablement), delay non-critical driver updates for a short window after release to let initial issues surface and be patched.
  • If you must upgrade for a specific fix, follow the pre-install checklist: backup, pause Windows Update, uncheck Factory Reset, and if necessary run a clean uninstall offline.
  • For IT-managed fleets, pilot updates on a small group of representative hardware before a broad deployment. Automate rollbacks via imaging or system restore snapshots.

Conclusion​

AMD has made meaningful, documented progress on several driver and installer problems that have frustrated Windows users. Fixes for frozen installer dialogs, progress bar stalls, and targeted corrections where Windows Update overwrote newer drivers are real improvements. Yet the persistence of concurrency-driven failure modes — and the need to ask users to pause Windows Update or avoid built-in cleanup features — underlines ongoing QA and architectural gaps.
The short-term advice is straightforward: apply AMD’s mitigations, pause Windows Update during installs, avoid Factory Reset until told otherwise, and keep robust backups. For the medium and long term, AMD and Microsoft must harden installer workflows and driver distribution coordination so users never have to trade off OS update security for driver reliability. Until that happens, cautious updating — combined with the practical workarounds outlined here — will be the safest route for the community.

Source: Neowin AMD details fixes for various Windows 11/10 chipset, graphics driver install issues
 

Microsoft has quietly begun steering Windows 10 users toward three hard choices—enroll in a one‑year Extended Security Updates (ESU) plan, upgrade to Windows 11, or trade in / recycle aging hardware—by adding an ESU “Enroll now” prompt and a new “Learn about options to trade‑in or recycle your PC” toggle to the Windows Update interface.

Monitor displays Windows 10 Extended Security Updates promo and Windows 11 upgrade tile.Background​

Windows 10 reaches official end of support on October 14, 2025, meaning Microsoft will stop issuing routine security patches and feature updates for the OS after that date. Microsoft’s official guidance urges users to upgrade to Windows 11 where possible, enroll eligible devices in the consumer ESU program for a single additional year of security updates, or replace devices that can’t meet Windows 11 hardware requirements.
The consumer ESU option is notable because it is being offered through multiple enrollment routes: free for devices that are signed into a Microsoft account with Settings sync enabled, by redeeming 1,000 Microsoft Rewards points, or by a one‑time purchase (the published amount is $30 USD or local equivalent). The ESU coverage window runs through October 13, 2026. Microsoft has rolled ESU enrollment out gradually and is placing the enrollment call‑to‑action inside Settings > Windows Update.

What changed in Windows Update: the new toggles and what they mean​

The two new UI cues​

Recent Windows 10 builds have begun showing two new experiences inside Windows Update: an “Enroll now” wizard for ESU enrollment and a “Learn about options to trade‑in or recycle your PC” toggle that links to Microsoft’s trade‑in and recycling resources. These UI prompts are being rolled out incrementally and may not appear on every device yet.
The trade‑in toggle takes users to the Microsoft Store Online Trade‑in Program, a third‑party powered program (Teladvance in the U.S.) that calculates trade‑in value, ships a prepaid label, and either returns value to customers or recycles ineligible devices responsibly. Microsoft’s Settings framework also allows OEMs to configure their own trade‑in and recycling links, which explains why a “Find programs to recycle your PC” link may show up even in regions where a direct Microsoft trade‑in service is not available.

Why the UI nudge matters​

Placing the trade‑in and ESU choices in the Windows Update surface is a deliberate product decision. It aims to intercept users at the moment they are thinking about updates and security, and it steers behavior along Microsoft’s preferred paths: keep Windows 10 briefly via ESU, move to Windows 11, or buy a new Windows 11 / Copilot+ PC. The move normalizes trade‑in/recycling as part of the upgrade flow rather than leaving device replacement entirely to the retail experience.

How the Windows 10 ESU enrollment works (practical mechanics)​

Basics and eligibility​

  • Devices must be running Windows 10 version 22H2 and be fully patched to be eligible to enroll for ESU updates. The ESU offers security‑only updates for critical and important vulnerabilities; it excludes new features and general technical support.
  • Enrollment routes:
  • Free: sign into Windows with a Microsoft account and enable Settings sync (backup of PC settings to OneDrive), then use the Settings > Windows Update > Enroll now wizard.
  • Rewards: redeem 1,000 Microsoft Rewards points for a one‑year ESU license.
  • Paid: pay a one‑time fee (published at $30 USD) for ESU coverage.
    Each Microsoft account can cover up to 10 devices when using the account‑link route.

Step‑by‑step enrollment (condensed)​

  • Open Settings > Update & Security > Windows Update.
  • Look for the “Enroll now” prompt under the “Windows 10 support ends in October 2025” message.
  • Click Enroll now and follow the wizard: sign into or link a Microsoft account if prompted, choose backup / Rewards / purchase option, and confirm enrollment.
  • After enrollment completes you should see confirmation on the Windows Update pane.

Caveats and risks​

  • Enrollment is rolling out gradually and Microsoft has acknowledged that not all devices will see the wizard immediately. Expect staged availability up to the EOL date.
  • The free enrollment option requires linking a device to a Microsoft account and enabling settings sync; users who insist on local accounts will need to pay or use Rewards. That trade‑off has provoked pushback from privacy‑conscientious users and those who want to avoid cloud account linking.

Trade‑in, recycling and the Microsoft Store program​

How the program operates​

Microsoft’s online trade‑in program is powered by Teladvance in the United States and is designed to provide a fast way to derive value from an old device or to ensure it is responsibly recycled. The flow is standard for trade‑in services: get a quote, ship your device using a prepaid label, receive credit (or free recycling if the device fails inspection). Manufacturers and retailers often offer similar programs. Microsoft also points Windows OEM partners toward configurable trade‑in/recycle links that surface in Settings.

Geographical nuance​

The Settings toggle appears to be global in rollout, but the underlying trade‑in program availability and partner will vary by country. In regions where Microsoft’s online trade‑in program is unavailable, the Settings link can surface a generic recycling guidance page or OEM‑configured partner. Reports indicate the toggle can be visible even when the underlying regional trade‑in partner is not; in such cases the link may not open a trade‑in workflow. Treat presence of the toggle as an invitation to explore options rather than a guarantee of a local buy‑back program. This observation is reported by several outlets and is consistent with Microsoft’s OEM customization framework.

The upgrade path to Windows 11 — supported and unsupported routes​

Microsoft’s public position is to encourage upgrades to Windows 11 for modern security features, while simultaneously insisting on a minimum hardware baseline that includes TPM 2.0, Secure Boot, and recent CPU families. Microsoft states it will not lower these requirements.
That said, unsupported upgrade methods exist in the wild and are widely documented. Techniques include:
  • A Microsoft‑documented registry switch that allows upgrades on otherwise unsupported CPUs or TPM versions (the AllowUpgradesWithUnsupportedTPMOrCPU key), used in an in‑place upgrade scenario.
  • Modified installation media created with third‑party tools (such as Rufus) or patched ISOs that bypass setup checks.
    These workarounds can let older hardware run Windows 11, but Microsoft warns the resulting installations are not supported, could fail to receive future updates, and may encounter driver or stability issues. Proceeding down that path trades short‑term access to Windows 11 features for long‑term uncertainty.

Why Microsoft is nudging trade‑ins and what’s at stake​

Business and product incentives​

  • Encouraging users to buy new Windows 11 or Copilot+ PCs aligns with Microsoft’s push to anchor its AI strategy on devices that include high‑performance NPUs and Windows 11‑specific feature sets. Copilot+ PCs ship with dedicated NPUs (40+ TOPS spec) and are marketed as the platform for on‑device AI experiences, creating an incentive to move customers to newer hardware.
  • Substituting hardware upgrades for software workarounds is commercially sensible for Microsoft and many OEMs: new device sales and a consistent hardware baseline reduce support complexity and enable richer feature sets that rely on modern silicon and security primitives.

Environmental and reputational calculus​

At face value, promoting recycling and trade‑in is positive—responsible reuse and recycling divert e‑waste from landfills. Microsoft explicitly points users toward recycling partners and programs in Settings. However, encouraging device replacement at scale raises tensions:
  • The physical footprint of producing new PCs (embodied carbon in steel, concrete and chips for data centers and PCs alike) is large. Microsoft’s sustainability reporting shows its total emissions have increased substantially due to data center expansion and supply chain effects. The company has acknowledged a rise in aggregate emissions versus a 2020 baseline and has begun purchasing sizable carbon removal contracts to offset growth.
  • The optics of asking users to swap hardware while the company’s operational footprint grows has sparked scrutiny: buy‑new nudges can be viewed as a convenient way to accelerate hardware cycles even as global sustainability ambitions demand longer device lifetimes and circularity. This tension sits at the heart of contemporary tech sustainability debates.

Microsoft’s carbon removal moves — the “poop” story and why it matters​

Microsoft has publicly purchased large carbon removal volumes in 2025, including a major offtake agreement with Vaulted Deep to sequester up to 4.9 million metric tonnes of carbon removal over 12 years by storing organic waste (bioslurry composed of biosolids, manure, paper sludge and similar feedstocks) deep underground. The approach uses injection wells to keep that biomass permanently out of the atmospheric carbon cycle, and Vaulted Deep and Microsoft have described the arrangement as a way to scale durable removal while also tackling otherwise difficult‑to‑manage organic waste.
Why this matters: Microsoft’s data‑center expansion (driven by AI) has materially increased its measured emissions since 2020, and these carbon removal purchases are part of the company’s strategy to remain on an aspirational path to being carbon negative by 2030. The tradeoffs are complex: such removal buys can be real and verifiable, but critics caution that offsets do not substitute for immediate emissions reductions, and that heavy reliance on removal contracts can delay necessary structural changes.

Critical analysis: strengths, trade‑offs and risks​

Strengths in Microsoft’s approach​

  • Practical safety valve: ESU gives users and businesses a controlled, time‑boxed route to remain protected for an additional year while they plan migrations to Windows 11 or other platforms. This reduces the immediate security risk of millions of legacy devices becoming suddenly unsupported.
  • Integrated lifecycle path: Surfacing trade‑in and recycling in Settings closes the loop between software EOL messaging and device disposal options, which could increase reuse rates and lower improper disposal. OEM customization of trade/recycle URLs is a pragmatic nod to diverse regional infrastructure.
  • Transparency on carbon commitments: Microsoft has been explicit about rising emissions tied to data center expansion and is publicly investing in large removal contracts to balance that growth—an honest articulation of the tradeoff between growth and near‑term carbon goals.

Risks and unanswered questions​

  • Privacy and account coercion: Offering a free ESU option that requires linking a Microsoft account and syncing Settings nudges users toward cloud accounts. That’s convenient for many, but it effectively monetizes user identity for security support and may irk those who prefer local accounts. The paid and Rewards alternatives exist, but they may not be widely advertised or understood.
  • E‑waste and rebound effects: Promoting trade‑ins alongside device upgrades risks accelerating hardware churn. Even with recycling programs, device manufacture and data center growth drive embodied emissions that recycling alone cannot fully mitigate. The net climate impact depends on manufacturing efficiency, the carbon intensity of supply chains, and whether replacements meaningfully extend device life or simply induce consumption.
  • Reliance on carbon removal: Large offtake deals for novel removal methods (including deep injection of bioslurry) are an emerging market. While the approach has supporting registrations and pilot facilities, permanence, monitoring and community acceptance are still active debates. Offsetting emissions with purchased removals is not the same as structural emissions reductions. Overreliance on removals could be a corporate risk if policy or markets change.
  • Unsupported Windows 11 installs: Users who bypass hardware checks can get Windows 11 but may lose future update eligibility or face driver incompatibilities. Microsoft explicitly cautions that unsupported installs may not receive updates and are not covered by support, creating longer‑term security and reliability hazards for DIY upgraders.

Practical recommendations for users (clear, actionable)​

  • Check eligibility first: Settings > Update & Security > Windows Update. Confirm you’re on Windows 10 version 22H2 and fully patched before attempting enrollment or upgrades.
  • If security is your priority and you want to remain on Windows 10 for a season, use the ESU path that suits you:
  • If comfortable with a Microsoft account: sign in and enable Settings sync for free ESU enrollment.
  • If you prefer no cloud account: consider the paid one‑time ESU purchase or redeem Rewards if available.
  • Understand ESU only covers critical security fixes through October 13, 2026.
  • If your hardware is eligible for Windows 11, prefer the official upgrade path. If it’s not, weigh the trade‑offs of unsupported installs carefully; back up everything and accept the risk of future incompatibility if proceeding.
  • If buying a new device, use official trade‑in or manufacturer buy‑back programs to recapture value and to ensure environmentally preferable recycling of the old device. Verify the partner in your country (Teladvance handles many U.S. transactions for Microsoft).
  • Consider alternatives: switching to a lightweight Linux distribution or ChromeOS Flex can extend the life of older hardware for many users who only need web, email and light productivity. This avoids immediate e‑waste and preserves access to security updates from an actively maintained OS.

What to watch next​

  • Rollout completion and telemetry: monitor whether Microsoft follows through on enabling the ESU enrollment wizard universally by the EOL date and whether uptake skews toward the account‑linked free option or paid enrollments.
  • Trade‑in program scope: watch for expansion of localized partners beyond Teladvance and for OEMs integrating trade‑in options at the point of sale. Greater local capacity could reduce cross‑border shipping of e‑waste.
  • Carbon removal governance: scrutiny of permanence, monitoring and registries for large removal contracts (including deep bioslurry injection) will shape the credibility of corporate offset strategies. Expect regulatory and market pressure to clarify standards.

Conclusion​

Microsoft’s UI changes in Windows Update are modest in code but consequential in intent: they compress the options available to aging Windows 10 users—pay for a temporary safety net, upgrade to Windows 11 (supported or unsupported), or trade in and buy new hardware—into a single, visible moment inside Settings. The ESU program provides a sensible stopgap for security, and trade‑in / recycling links are a useful nudge toward reducing improper disposal. But the plan also foregrounds uncomfortable trade‑offs: privacy concessions for free security, increased device churn with embodied carbon implications, and the company’s reliance on large carbon removal purchases to balance rapid AI‑led growth.
For end users, the pragmatic path is straightforward: verify eligibility, pick the ESU route that matches privacy and budget preferences if short‑term security is needed, explore direct upgrade or replacement options only after assessing driver and update continuity, and prefer responsible trade‑in or reuse to consigning gear to landfill. For policymakers and the industry, the situation underscores an urgent need to couple device refresh cycles with stricter circularity rules, transparent offset standards, and incentives that prioritize repair, reuse and long‑life designs over rapid replacement.

Source: WindowsLatest Microsoft wants you to recycle or trade-in your Windows 10 PC if it can't be upgraded to Windows 11
 

Back
Top