• Thread Author
As Microsoft draws the curtain on Windows 10 support in October 2025, millions of users face a pivotal crossroads. For those with aging PCs incapable of running Windows 11, the company’s official advice oscillates between purchasing a new device or, for businesses and schools, paying for extended security support—both options with significant costs, be they financial or environmental. Into this uncertainty steps the newly launched ‘End of 10’ project, a coordinated effort by Linux advocates to convince Windows 10 users to breathe new life into their older PCs—by switching to Linux, a free, open-source alternative that the project claims can make your hardware “fast and secure again.”

A man wearing glasses is working on a laptop in a tech-focused room with a digital Earth display.
The Looming Windows 10 Deadline and Its Implications​

Windows 10 still commands a vast installed base, and with official support ceasing in October 2025, the stakes are high. Microsoft’s Windows 11, released in 2021, introduced stricter hardware requirements, including mandatory TPM 2.0 (Trusted Platform Module) and more-modern CPUs, excluding countless perfectly functioning PCs from a smooth upgrade path. The result: millions of users face the prospect of running an unsupported, insecure OS or shelling out for new hardware.
Microsoft's offer of paid Extended Security Updates (ESU) for individuals in 2025-2026—a break from precedent—provides only a temporary reprieve. For the average consumer, this choice does little to address the underlying issue: obsolescence by design, forcing many to discard working devices that no longer make the cut for official support.

Introducing the ‘End of 10’ Project​

The ‘End of 10’ initiative positions itself as a lifeline for those left stranded by Microsoft’s shifting requirements. Unlike previous campaigns, it does not endorse any single Linux distribution (or ‘distro’), instead calling for a broad embrace of Linux as a way to keep PCs from the landfill. The project’s arguments hinge on several core appeals: resource efficiency and environmental responsibility, enhanced user privacy, and the promise of ongoing, cost-free updates.
Notably, the project highlights the environmental cost of unnecessary hardware upgrades. Citing data from various lifecycle analyses, the production of a new PC is responsible for over 75% of its total carbon emissions—a figure upheld by recent research from the Global e-Sustainability Initiative and others. By extending the life of existing devices, users can make a significant dent in their carbon footprint.

The Core Benefits Advocated by End of 10​

1. Environmental Responsibility

E-waste is a growing global problem. According to the Global E-waste Monitor, the world generated nearly 54 million metric tons of e-waste in 2019, with only a fraction properly recycled. Much of this stems from rapid hardware churn driven by software obsolescence. The End of 10 project echoes expert consensus: simply using devices longer is one of the most effective ways individuals can reduce their technological climate impact.

2. Privacy and Freedom from Bloat

The project emphasizes Linux’s lack of built-in advertising, telemetry, and “spyware”—a pointed jab at Windows 11, which has intensified its use of inbuilt ads, promotions, and user-tracking analytics. While Microsoft has defended its telemetry practices as necessary for improvement and security, privacy advocates and many users remain uneasy, especially as data collection becomes ever more pervasive.

3. User Empowerment and Control

Unlike Windows, most Linux distros leave the user firmly in control, unhampered by forced upgrades or shifting support deadlines. Updates are free, and users are insulated from heavy-handed upsell tactics. As the End of 10 campaign puts it: you aren’t “pushed to upgrade” under threat of losing critical updates or functionality.

4. Cost

Switching to Linux is free. Most distributions, including user-friendly favorites like Ubuntu, Linux Mint, and Fedora, are open-source and come with no licensing fees. In contrast, paid ESU for Windows 10 is priced by Microsoft for business and, for the first time, personal use—but as with previous ESU offerings, costs will likely rise each year, pushing many toward new hardware regardless.

Why So Many PCs Can’t Upgrade to Windows 11​

Microsoft’s system requirements for Windows 11 represent a distinct break from the past:
  • TPM 2.0: This security module, absent from many systems built before 2016, is now mandatory.
  • Modern CPUs: Only relatively recent Intel (8th-gen and newer) and AMD (Ryzen 2000+) processors are officially supported.
  • Secure Boot: Part of the UEFI firmware suite, also not always available on older hardware.
Though bypasses exist for tech-savvy users, they are unsanctioned by Microsoft and may not be viable for everyday users or organizations who prioritize reliability.

The Linux Experience—And Its Learning Curve​

Linux has come a long way since the days when even installing it required advanced technical know-how. Today’s mainstream distributions are capable, polished, and in many cases, easier to maintain than their Windows counterparts. Distros such as Ubuntu, Linux Mint, and Elementary OS offer user interfaces familiar to Windows migrants, bundled with free alternatives to most mainstream software.
However, the learning curve is undeniable. Users accustomed to Windows may find some tasks—from installing new software, to hardware troubleshooting, to running certain applications—require adaptation and a willingness to consult online documentation or ask for help. The End of 10 project is forthright about this shift, arguing that online forums, local repair cafes, and community support can smooth the transition. In practice, the availability and approachability of such support may vary greatly by region.

Community Support—A Double-Edged Sword?​

Linux boasts one of the most active and helpful communities in computing. Forums, wikis, and chat rooms swarm with advice for newbies and veterans alike. Yet, as TechRadar noted, outside of European regions with an established “repair cafe” ethos, in-person help is not always available, and relying on forums can be intimidating for less experienced users.
Nonetheless, the camaraderie and persistence of Linux enthusiasts are legendary—a fact underscored by the End of 10’s roster, which features contributors from major Linux desktop environment projects (KDE, Gnome) and organizations such as Free Software Foundation Europe.

Compatibility Considerations: Software and Gaming​

For many, the dealbreaker remains software compatibility. Essential business or niche applications that only run on Windows may not have direct Linux equivalents, though open-source alternatives (LibreOffice, GIMP, Inkscape, and others) abound for mainstream tasks. Compatibility layers like Wine and Crossover can run some Windows applications on Linux, but integration and reliability are not universal.
Gaming is a mixed bag. Thanks to efforts like Valve’s Proton (built into Steam) and Lutris, thousands of Windows games now run well on Linux. However, major obstacles remain, particularly with anti-cheat software and some online multiplayer titles—issues the Linux desktop community is working to resolve, but that remain real-world frustrations for now.

Critical Analysis: Can Linux Really Save Your Old PC?​

The End of 10 project’s core message is compelling. Extending device lifespans is proven to benefit the environment, reduce e-waste, and soften the impact of Big Tech’s upgrade cycles. For moderately tech-savvy users—and especially for organizations with IT support—Linux offers a viable escape hatch from forced obsolescence. Its security posture, rapid update cadence, and absence of bloat make it a robust choice for many scenarios.

Strengths​

  • Resource Efficiency and Carbon Savings: Reusing working hardware saves significant emissions compared to manufacturing new devices. The cited figure of 75% lifecycle emissions from manufacturing is supported by multiple independent studies, including work by the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre.
  • Privacy and User Autonomy: Linux’s open-source ethos largely precludes hidden telemetry, data mining, or unremovable bloatware—a welcome relief for privacy-conscious users dismayed by Microsoft’s increasing ad pushes in Windows 11.
  • Security with Less Overhead: Modern Linux distros are less targeted by malware, and most have robust, automatic patching systems. Notably, many security researchers endorse Linux for users seeking maximum privacy and minimum digital footprint.
  • Zero licensing cost: Especially for multi-device households or nonprofits, avoiding license and ESU fees can offer substantial savings.

Caveats and Challenges​

  • Initial Learning Curve: For users with little technical exposure, installing and configuring Linux is easier than ever—but still involves unfamiliar steps, especially if dual-booting or preserving existing data.
  • Hardware Compatibility: Some peripherals and Wi-Fi cards may still require additional fiddling or proprietary drivers, though support is broader and simpler than a decade ago. For pre-2010 hardware, verify Linux distro compatibility before switching.
  • Software Gaps: Essential Windows-only programs and certain high-end games remain stumbling blocks. Where possible, investigate open-source alternatives, or try Wine/Proton for non-critical needs.
  • Local Support Disparities: The “free local help” promise is variable. While robust in some European countries, in others, support is mostly online, limiting options for users uncomfortable with forums.

Risks and Limitations​

Migrating to Linux is not a panacea. Very old hardware may still struggle with performance, though lightweight distros (e.g., Lubuntu, Xubuntu, or antiX) can help. Similarly, users deeply invested in the Windows software ecosystem or with workflows tied to programs like Photoshop, AutoCAD, or certain enterprise apps, will find migration challenging at best.
It’s also vital to choose a well-maintained distribution; some fly-by-night projects vanish, leaving users stranded. Stick with established choices—Ubuntu, Fedora, Linux Mint, Debian, or the like—for the best updates and community support.
In the enterprise, switching large numbers of endpoints is a major project requiring retraining, compatibility analysis, and possibly support contracts. For home users or small non-critical offices, the risks are lower, but the challenges remain real.

The Microsoft Response—and What It Means for Consumers​

Microsoft’s approach—urging new hardware purchases, with an expensive ESU band-aid as a last resort—has drawn criticism from environmentalists and digital rights advocates. While Microsoft touts Windows 11 as more secure, the lack of meaningful recycling incentives and the sheer volume of e-waste generated raise uncomfortable questions about the company’s long-term sustainability commitments.
Community-driven projects like End of 10 offer a rare counter-narrative: that users do have a practical, ethical alternative to forced obsolescence. Successfully spreading this message, however, depends on clear, honest communication about both the benefits and the learning curve. For many, a hybrid approach—trying Linux first via a live USB or dual-boot—may be a prudent step.

Practical Steps for Users Facing Windows 10 End-of-Life​

  • Inventory your software needs. Make a list of must-have applications and check whether they have Linux versions or viable alternatives.
  • Test-drive Linux. Most mainstream distributions offer live USBs; you can try them without installing or risking your current setup.
  • Backup critical data before any migration.
  • Explore community resources: forums for Ubuntu, Mint, and others are highly active, and guides abound for common tasks like installation and hardware troubleshooting.
  • Choose a mainstream distro for best support and updates.
  • Consult with local repair shops or community tech events—especially in Europe, this support can be invaluable.

Conclusion: Is Linux the Silver Bullet for Aging PCs?​

For users still running Windows 10 on unsupported hardware, Linux offers a genuine pathway to keep that device alive, secure, and useful—without surrendering to the pressure to buy new. The learning curve and compatibility hurdles are real, particularly for less technical users or gaming enthusiasts, but the progress over the past decade has been remarkable. For many—particularly those concerned about e-waste, privacy, or cost—Linux is worth a serious look.
As the End of 10 project suggests, defying the forced obsolescence of modern computing is not only possible: it’s an act of practical environmental stewardship and digital self-determination. While not a universal solution, for millions of users left in Windows 10’s wake, Linux is no longer a fringe alternative—it’s a credible answer proudly built on community, choice, and sustainability.

Source: TechRadar Can’t upgrade to Windows 11? This Linux project wants to save your old PC from the scrapheap when Windows 10 support ends
 

Back
Top