Running Linux in Excel: The Ultimate Offbeat Tech Hack Unveiled

When it comes to offbeat tech experiments, few are as eyebrow-raising as this year’s revelation that Linux—not just a single application, but an entire operating system kernel—can be “booted” from within Microsoft Excel. It’s a project that rides the razor-thin border between technical curiosity, playful hacking, and sheer absurdity, but also sheds light on the flexibility, quirks, and sometimes hidden power of modern Windows environments. As reported by The Register and closely scrutinized by the broader tech community, what does it really mean to run Linux "in Excel"? And does this signal the start of new hybrid computing frontiers, or is it merely an amusing footnote in software history? Let’s dig deep, separate myth from reality, and explore the implications for Windows power users, security professionals, and digital tinkerers alike.

The Backstory: From Doom to Linux, Excel’s Hidden World​

Microsoft Excel’s reputation as a spreadsheet colossus is unchallenged in the business world, but over the years, creative (and sometimes mischievous) users have pushed its limits far beyond standard number crunching. We’ve seen games like Doom, Conway’s Game of Life, and even a simple flight simulator meticulously reconstructed in spreadsheet cells through formulas and macros. These stunts often balance technical prowess with a sense of irreverence, delighting both programmers and office workers forced into endless budget reconciliation.
In 2024, the ante was upped yet again when a developer known as NSG650 managed to orchestrate the “booting” of Linux in Excel—not by simulating the computational logic entirely within formulas, but through a clever marriage of macros, emulation, and external code. Given Excel’s deep support for Visual Basic for Applications (VBA), the experiment stretched the underlying fabric of what Microsoft’s productivity suite could permit, at least on native Windows systems.

How Was “Linux in Excel” Achieved? Unpacking the Technical Details​

The idea of running a wholly different operating system within a spreadsheet might at first sound like science fiction or a viral misunderstanding. But this project leverages several well-understood components, connected in an unconventional way:

1. VBA Macros: The Glue of Office Automation​

Excel’s VBA macro engine allows users and developers to automate tasks, manipulate spreadsheets in real time, and—even more powerfully—call external libraries in the form of Dynamic Link Libraries (DLLs). This ability often raises security concerns, as malicious macros can invoke system-level APIs, but it is also the foundation on which unusual add-ons and integrations are built.

2. External RISC-V Emulator (mini-rv32ima)​

Rather than attempt to port Linux—even a minimal version—directly into spreadsheet logic, the developer wisely sidestepped this Herculean task by interfacing Excel’s macro environment with the mini-rv32ima RISC-V CPU emulator packaged as a Windows DLL. The logic flow is as follows:

• The user launches a macro within Excel, triggering VBA code.
• VBA calls functions exposed by the emulator DLL.
• The RISC-V emulator runs a precompiled Linux kernel, simulating CPU functionality entirely outside of Excel’s native computation engine.
• Output from the Linux kernel is piped back into Excel cells, giving the illusion of a text-based Linux boot sequence or command prompt.

3. Display and Interactivity​

Rather than a true Linux terminal interface, the system uses Excel cells as a crude console. The output is written to cell ranges, and user input is (with some limitations) sent through supporting VBA routines. This is, by design, both slow and clunky—suitable for simple commands but not for editing files in vi or running full graphical environments.

What Can This Excel-Linux Mashup Actually Do?​

Let’s be clear: This is not a “usable” Linux workstation hidden in your financial forecast. As NSG650 himself candidly admitted to The Register, the project was “done mostly for fun,” and is “very buggy.” The main achievement is proof-of-concept; the Emulator runs a Linux kernel, you can send basic text commands, and receive output—a technical marvel, but far from practical.
No pipe-dreams of remote SSH-ing into Excel, running containers, or compiling code “in-place.” In practice:

• Only basic Linux commands work, with severe speed and responsiveness limits.
• Text input is rudimentary; actions like running vi (the Unix text editor) aren’t feasible.
• The system only functions when Excel is running on Windows, due to DLL requirements and VBA dependency. No web-based Office, macOS, or cloud platforms are supported.

What’s the Point? Analyzing Motivation and Value​

This inevitably poses the question: why go to the trouble of running Linux on Excel at all? There are several answers—some technical, some philosophical.

1. Fun and Curiosity​

Openly, the project is less about utility and more about testing boundaries. NSG650 stated, “I wanted to run Linux in Excel and this was one way to do so.” The spark is the challenge itself: what’s possible with today’s interconnected, macro-driven legacy platforms?

2. Educational Value​

While not practical for everyday Linux usage, projects like this serve as unique demonstrations for students or enthusiasts looking to understand:

• How emulation creates virtual hardware within software constraints.
• The relationship between host platforms, scripting languages (VBA), and low-level computing (RISC-V).
• Security models: Excel’s power to call DLLs reminds us why modern endpoint security consistently warns against enabling macros in untrusted workbooks.

3. Highlighting Flexibility (and Risk) in Modern Office Suites​

If Excel can bridge out to low-level emulators and accept input back into its display, what else are macros and DLLs capable of? Projects like this offer a moment of reflection for IT professionals and sysadmins charged with enforcing secure computing environments.

The Broader Context: Excel’s “Turing-Complete” Lore​

The question of what Excel can and cannot do is a recurring theme in technology discussions. Spreadsheet programs, with their formula languages and scripting support, are “Turing complete”—at least in principle—which means, with enough ingenuity, any computation that can be performed by a computer could be coaxed into existence within the confines of a workbook. But just because something can be done doesn’t mean it’s feasible, safe, or efficient.
Past examples abound:

• Running Doom in Excel: Achieved by leveraging the calculation engine to render visuals cell-by-cell, albeit at glacial speeds and with no practical benefit.
• CPU Emulators: Entire 16-bit CPUs with simulated RAM and display output cobbled together from vast sheets of formulas, serving more as curiosities or teaching tools than production engines.
• Custom Programming Languages: Implementing interpreters or compilers for toy languages purely within Excel formulas.

Each of these stunts reveals not just the power of the tool, but also the rich interplay of creativity, technical constraint, and out-of-the-box problem solving.

Critical Examination: Strengths and Caveats​

Notable Strengths​

• Proof of Concept Ingenuity: Technically adept use of available tools; demonstrates an unconventional integration rarely attempted or documented.
• Awareness of Security Model: By restricting execution to Windows, and requiring macros (with appropriate user warnings), the project aligns with expected Office sandboxing principles. It indirectly underlines the importance of endpoint vigilance.
• Community Engagement: By crediting contributors like Enderman and Cnolhr, the project showcases collaborative spirit—a hallmark of healthy open-source and DIY communities.

Potential Risks and Drawbacks​

• Security Implications: Any Office document running macros and invoking DLLs represents a significant security risk, especially in enterprise environments. While this particular project is intended as a toy, its very existence demonstrates a vector by which malicious code could conceivably sneak in, hidden behind innocuous spreadsheets.
• Performance and Practicality: The system is “very buggy,” slow, and unsuitable for doing real work. It’s a case study in how technical feasibility does not equate to usability.
• Platform Lock-In: With support limited to Windows desktops (Office 2021 LTSC tested and confirmed), the approach underscores the limitations of traditional, native software architectures compared to cloud-first or cross-platform solutions.

Verifiable Claims and Cautionary Notes​

• The reported use of Office 2021 LTSC was confirmed by the project author and quoted by The Register, but no independent tests across other versions (365, Office 2019, Office for Mac, or Office Online) have been independently verified at time of writing.
• The use of mini-rv32ima as an emulator is documented and its operational principle is familiar to emulation enthusiasts, though specifics of what kernel was run or full compatibility lists remain undocumented.
• No official statement from Microsoft acknowledges or condones the technique, nor is such a use case referenced in official “What’s New in Excel” updates; ActiveX controls are reportedly slated to be disabled by default, but VBA support is set to continue.

Reader Takeaways: Should You Try It? What Are the Lessons?​

For the Windows enthusiast, what’s the real value here?

For Advanced Users and Experimenters​

Trying this at home could be a fun deep dive into how Windows, Excel, and low-level code intertwine. Expect limited real use, significant troubleshooting, and the need to trust unsigned DLLs and macros. Don’t use it on critical systems or sensitive data.

For Security Professionals​

This project should be exhibit A in training courses about why Office macros are so tightly controlled and why endpoint detection is critical. The same mechanisms that enable benign experiments can, in far more hands, facilitate exploits, lateral movement, and data exfiltration.

For IT Managers and Sysadmins​

The “Linux in Excel” curiosity is a reminder that legacy platforms like VBA remain embedded in business workflows. Microsoft’s decision to keep VBA alive (even as ActiveX is phased out) reflects demand, but also keeps the door open to both deliberate and accidental mayhem.

For the Average Office User​

There is no practical benefit here—no new productivity gains or hidden features unlocked. But this story is a testament to the unpredictability and adaptability of both the software we rely on and the communities that use it in unintended ways.

The Bigger Picture: Why These Projects Matter​

At first glance, projects like “Linux in Excel” seem pointless—an advanced prank at the cost of corporate productivity. But as history shows, unexpected mashups and “for fun” hacks often prefigure the very tools and techniques that power tomorrow’s workflows. Technologies like platform emulation, hybrid scripting environments, and modular software are mainstream today in no small part because early experimenters explored bizarre, fringe use cases.
It is reported that the author of this project has no plans to improve or expand it, and there is little likelihood of it penetrating mainstream use. Some reports suggest, however, that similar low-level hacks will persist as long as software platforms remain open to expansion via scripting, add-ons, and developer-facing APIs.
The real lesson? Software systems—especially those as widely deployed as Excel—are not just productivity engines. They’re canvases for creativity, laboratories for unexpected discoveries, and sometimes, inadvertently, epicenters of security drama.

Conclusions: Hybrid Futures or Fun with Spreadsheets?​

“Running Linux in Excel” is, above all, a stunt—one that balances on the knife-edge between technical mastery and pointless provocation. It reveals the enduring power, and danger, of programmable platforms like Office. While the project is of negligible practical use, it serves as a memorable reminder: the boundaries of what’s possible in mainstream software are limited less by official documentation than by the curiosity and inventiveness of their users.
As VBA remains part of Excel’s DNA (for now), and as Office’s boundaries are pushed by both Microsoft engineers and independent hackers, we can look forward to even stranger hybrids in the years to come. Whether this leads to valuable new paradigms or simply more hallway legends is, as always, up to those who dare to experiment.
In the end, while neither Linux nor Excel comes out objectively “improved” by this union, our understanding of both—what they are, and what they might one day be—has undeniably grown.

---

Source: theregister.com Linux in Excel? Sure, why not ruin both