Sales Order Assistant: Copilot in Teams for Jaipur Living's Dynamics 365

  • Thread Author
Sunrise Technologies has rolled out a production AI agent, named Sales Order Assistant, for Jaipur Living — an in‑house Copilot agent built and deployed with Microsoft Copilot Studio that surfaces order queries inside Microsoft Teams and is designed to sit on top of Jaipur Living’s Dynamics 365 Finance and Supply Chain Management deployment.

Customer service agent wearing a headset interacts with a holographic Sales Order Assistant dashboard.Background​

Jaipur Living — a global rug maker with a large artisan network — positioned the new Sales Order Assistant as the next step in its technology journey after earlier adopting Dynamics 365 Finance & Supply Chain Management. Sunrise Technologies, a long‑standing Microsoft partner, developed the agent using Microsoft’s Copilot Studio tooling and published it for exclusive use by Jaipur Living’s customer service representatives to answer common order-related questions in Teams.
This announcement arrives as part of a broader industry trend: enterprises are extending their ERP and CRM back ends with Copilot‑style agents to reduce repetitive work, surface transaction context in the flow of work, and shorten resolution times for routine customer inquiries. Microsoft’s Copilot Studio and the Dynamics 365 family are explicitly designed to support these “agent‑in‑Teams” scenarios, providing connectors to Dataverse, secure identity, and action/flow integration via Power Platform.

What Sunrise built: Sales Order Assistant — a concise summary​

  • The agent is branded Sales Order Assistant and is intended for internal use by Jaipur Living customer service reps.
  • It answers common sales-order questions such as:
  • Order status
  • Shipment tracking
  • Credit card charges
  • Cancellations
  • Estimated delivery times
  • The assistant is deployed into Microsoft Teams, enabling agents to fetch order information without switching context away from their collaboration environment.
This design mirrors recommended patterns for Copilot agents: connect a curated knowledge/data surface (Dataverse/Dynamics 365 records), expose constrained conversational flows in Teams, and retain human‑in‑the‑loop escalation for cases that require judgment or non‑data remedies.

Why this matters: practical business value​

Short‑term operational gains for a retailer/manufacturer like Jaipur Living are immediate and measurable when an AI agent is implemented correctly:
  • Reduced average handle time (AHT) — agents can pull order and shipment information in seconds, rather than switching applications and searching multiple screens.
  • Higher first‑contact resolution (FCR) — routine, data‑driven requests are resolved quickly, leaving human agents to focus on complex or sensitive interactions.
  • Improved employee experience — removing repetitive navigation tasks keeps service reps focused on customer relationship work.
  • Scalability and repeatability — an agent built in Copilot Studio can be refined, governed, and published consistently to Teams across regions.
The business case is straightforward: automate low‑risk, high‑volume queries to free skilled staff for high‑value conversation and escalation handling — a common ROI pattern in contact‑center automation projects that leverage Dynamics 365 and Copilot agents.

Technical overview: architecture and integration points​

Core components (typical Copilot + Dynamics approach)​

  • Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Supply Chain Management: the ERP/transactional system that stores sales orders, shipments, and billing records.
  • Dataverse (or secured connectors): the data plane that Copilot agents use to read the relevant records and present grounded answers.
  • Microsoft Copilot Studio: used to author the agent’s conversational behavior, knowledge connectors, and hand‑off logic.
  • Microsoft Teams: the UI surface where customer service reps interact with the assistant in the flow of work.
  • Power Platform / Flows / APIs: to enable actions such as order cancellation or raising fulfillment tickets, if such capabilities are exposed.

How queries are typically handled​

  • Agent receives a user question in Teams (e.g., “What’s the ship date for SO12345?”).
  • Copilot agent maps the query to an intent and retrieves grounded facts from Dataverse/Dynamics via connectors.
  • The agent returns the precise data (shipment status, tracking URL, charge status) and—if necessary—starts a pre‑approved action (e.g., cancel order request) or escalates to a human.
This pattern works well when the agent is strictly grounded on known transactional data and when the agent provides clear provenance (e.g., “Order status pulled from Dynamics 365 on [timestamp]”) rather than speculative answers.

Strengths and notable positives​

  • Native Microsoft stack: Building with Copilot Studio and Dynamics 365 reduces integration friction and leverages first‑party connectors, identity, and compliance features. This lowers the bar for secure, auditable access to transactional data.
  • In‑context access (Teams): Surfacing answers inside Microsoft Teams keeps agents in their collaboration flow and reduces context switching — a proven productivity win for contact centers and field teams.
  • Operational focus: The assistant concentrates on order‑centric, high‑volume questions (status, tracking, billing) — a conservative scope that maximizes early accuracy and reduces risk.
  • Vendor credibility: Sunrise Technologies has a long history of Dynamics and Copilot work and was described publicly as a partner delivering Copilot‑enabled business application solutions — a practical advantage for customers that prefer experienced integrators.
  • Scalability path: Agents authored in Copilot Studio can be iterated, governed, and published for additional teams or parallel use cases (returns, warranty, B2B order support) once the initial deployment proves value.

Risks and gaps — what to watch for​

While the Sales Order Assistant addresses an obvious productivity gap, several categories of risk must be considered and managed before, during, and after rollout.

Data accuracy and hallucination risk​

Even when agents are connected to authoritative systems like Dynamics 365, prompt engineering errors or insufficient query grounding can lead to ambiguous responses. If the agent mixes transactional facts with generative language without clear provenance, customers or agents could act on incorrect information. This is a core concern for finance and order data.

Payment and PII exposure​

Order queries frequently implicate sensitive payment or personal information (credit‑card charges, addresses). Exposing such data in conversational surfaces demands strict access policies, message redaction where appropriate, and encryption/logging controls. Any agent that reads payment records must follow PCI/PII controls and clear least‑privilege access patterns.

Governance and auditability​

Enterprises must document:
  • Who can publish agents,
  • What data sources are permitted,
  • How model decisions are logged,
  • How human hand‑offs are tracked.
Without a governance playbook, organizations risk inconsistent agent behaviors, compliance gaps, and difficulty debugging incidents. Copilot Studio provides governance tooling, but it must be configured and enforced.

Operational and cost model​

Copilot and agent workloads are billed on model usage, calls to connectors, and supporting infrastructure. Agents that appear “cheap” in pilot form can create significant ongoing platform and compute costs at scale. Planning consumption tiers and SLAs is essential.

Vendor lock‑in and portability​

A Copilot‑native agent that deeply ties UI, identity, and business logic into Microsoft services may be hard to migrate away from. Enterprises should request architecture designs that separate domain logic, data access, and conversational prompts so that replacement or multi‑cloud strategies remain feasible.

Practical recommendations and best practices​

To maximize value and reduce the risks above, organizations adopting similar Copilot agents should follow a structured program:
  • Readiness and data hygiene
  • Inventory and clean master data (customers, products, shipping partners).
  • Ensure Dynamics 365 records are up to date and accessible via secure connectors.
  • Constrain scope for early pilots
  • Start with read‑only informational queries (order status, tracking links).
  • Defer write actions (refunds, cancellations) until robust approval workflows exist.
  • Implement strict access controls and redaction
  • Apply role‑based access controls (RBAC) for sensitive fields.
  • Mask or redact payment PANs and other PCI data in conversation responses.
  • Enforce provenance and audit trails
  • Have the agent display the data source and timestamp for each answer.
  • Log every agent interaction and hand‑off for audit and debugging.
  • Governance playbook and SLA model
  • Define who can publish agents, review content, and approve connectors.
  • Set up incident response, rollback procedures, and performance SLAs.
  • Cost and consumption management
  • Estimate model usage and connector calls under expected load.
  • Set thresholds and alerts for consumption spikes.
  • Human‑in‑the‑loop fallback
  • Ensure easy escalation to agents and organized triage for ambiguous cases.
These steps align with Microsoft’s own guidance on rolling out Copilot agents and are reflected in early enterprise deployments that emphasize governance and phased rollout.

Governance checklist for IT and Security teams​

  • Approve connector scopes and consent flows for Dynamics 365 access.
  • Require multi‑factor and conditional access for any user invoking PII‑bearing queries.
  • Establish monitoring (OpenTelemetry or equivalent) and set up alerts for anomalous agent behavior.
  • Maintain an agent change log and controlled publishing pipeline (staging → test → production).
  • Perform periodic red‑team tests to surface unintended information disclosures.
  • Define retention policies for chat transcripts, logs, and extracted data.

Interpreting company claims and unverifiable statements​

The press materials describe Jaipur Living as “the world’s largest manufacturer of hand knotted rugs” and cite a network of “more than 40,000 artisans in over 700 villages.” Those are meaningful brand claims, but they are corporate assertions that should be treated as such until verified independently from third‑party industry data. Readers and procurement teams should ask for corroborating evidence (market share analysis, independent industry reports, or auditable supplier registries) before treating such statements as settled facts. This kind of verification step is standard when claims affect trust, procurement, or contractual commitments.

How Jaipur Living’s use case maps to broader enterprise trends​

  • Agent‑first contact centers: The move to embed agents in Teams, connected to Dynamics 365, is a practical manifestation of the “agent‑first” workplace trend — agents that do one thing well and hand off to humans for nuance. Microsoft’s product strategy and Copilot Studio are explicitly pursuing this pattern.
  • ERP + AI composability: Extending ERP platforms with targeted AI agents is now a common modality for modernizing service and supply‑chain processes without ripping out core systems. The value comes from composability: quick wins without wholesale ERP replacement.
  • Responsible rollout emphasis: Recent enterprise guidance and partner playbooks emphasize governance, data sovereignty, and human oversight as preconditions to scale. Jaipur Living’s conservative, internal‑only deployment of Sales Order Assistant fits this advised pattern.

What success looks like (KPIs and signals to track)​

  • Reduction in average handle time for order inquiries (target: 20–40% in early months).
  • Increase in first‑contact resolution for order‑status questions.
  • Decrease in agent context‑switch events (measured by number of app switches per interaction).
  • Reduction in escalations for routine queries; measured uplift in agent capacity for relationship tasks.
  • Contained model and connector consumption within budgeted thresholds.
  • No incidents of PII/PCI leakage attributable to the agent.

Final analysis: balanced verdict​

Sunrise Technologies’ deployment of Sales Order Assistant for Jaipur Living is a pragmatic, low‑risk first step in operationalizing Copilot‑style agents across a retail/manufacturing business. By constraining the agent to order‑centric, high‑volume queries and deploying into Teams on top of Dynamics 365, the project follows recommended enterprise patterns that favor early wins and controlled governance.
Strengths include strong alignment with the Microsoft product stack, a focused scope that maximizes accuracy, and the practical productivity wins typical of in‑context agent assistance. The main risks are standard for conversational AI over transactional systems: data sensitivity, potential for ambiguous or misleading outputs if grounding is incomplete, governance gaps, and ongoing cost/consumption management. These can be mitigated with a clear governance playbook, role‑based access controls, explicit provenance in responses, exhaustive logging, and a staged rollout plan.
For enterprises considering similar projects, the operating principle is clear: start small, measure concretely, invest in governance up front, and iterate only after proving that the agent improves both customer experience and operational efficiency.

Sunrise and Jaipur Living’s announcement is a textbook example of practical Copilot adoption: focused business value, first‑party Microsoft integration, and a path to scale that depends on robust governance rather than hype.

Source: The AI Journal Sunrise Technologies Launches AI Agent for Jaipur Living | The AI Journal
 

Sunrise Technologies has deployed a production AI agent called Sales Order Assistant for Jaipur Living, embedding a Copilot‑style assistant into Microsoft Teams that surfaces order and shipment information from Dynamics 365 — a narrowly scoped, in‑flow automation designed to reduce repetitive work for customer service representatives and accelerate order resolution.

Microsoft Teams–style alert showing an order shipped notification with a tracking link, pulled from Dynamics 365 via Dataverse.Background​

Jaipur Living is a global rug and home‑goods business that publicly cites a large artisan network — commonly described in company materials as more than 40,000 artisans across 700 villages — and has been modernizing its operations with Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Supply Chain Management prior to this Copilot Studio deployment.
Sunrise Technologies, a long‑standing Microsoft partner focused on Dynamics 365 and Power Platform services, built the Sales Order Assistant using Microsoft Copilot Studio and published the assistant for internal use by Jaipur Living’s customer service team inside Microsoft Teams. The assistant answers routine order queries (order status, shipment tracking, charge status, cancellations, estimated delivery), grounding responses in transactional data from Dynamics/Dataverse and exposing pre‑approved actions where appropriate.
This announcement is part of a broader enterprise trend: companies are increasingly extending ERP and CRM back ends with targeted AI agents to provide context within collaboration tools, reduce average handle time (AHT), and improve first‑contact resolution (FCR). Microsoft’s Copilot tooling, Dataverse connectors, and Teams publishing channels explicitly support this scenario.

Overview: What Sunrise built and why it matters​

The Sales Order Assistant in plain terms​

  • A Teams‑published Copilot agent (Sales Order Assistant) for internal use by Jaipur Living customer service reps.
  • Primary functions: Retrieve sales order status, shipment tracking links, payment/credit‑card charge visibility, process cancellations (where authorized) and give estimated delivery windows.
  • Data sources and grounding: Dynamics 365 Finance & Supply Chain Management (transactional system), Dataverse as the knowledge plane, and Power Platform flows/APIs for permitted actions. The agent is designed to surface explicit provenance (e.g., “pulled from Dynamics 365”) rather than freeform speculation.
  • UX surface: Microsoft Teams — letting agents query orders in the collaboration context instead of switching applications.

Why this pattern is practical​

Embedding concise, well‑scoped agents on top of ERP data is a high‑leverage move for mid‑sized retail and manufacturing businesses. The expected near‑term wins are clear:
  • Faster responses: Agents can fetch authoritative order facts in seconds, lowering AHT.
  • Higher FCR: Routine, data‑driven inquiries are resolved immediately, leaving human agents to handle nuanced or exception cases.
  • Improved employee experience: Reducing repetitive navigation preserves human time for relationship work.
  • Scalability and repeatability: Copilot Studio agents built with Dataverse grounding are portable across regions and teams with a controlled publishing pipeline.
These are not speculative claims: the patterns mirror Microsoft’s guidance for Copilot connectors and Dataverse integration, and similar enterprise deployments have followed the same blueprint.

Architecture and technical anatomy​

Core components​

  • Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Supply Chain Management — stores sales orders, shipments, invoices and billing records (transactional source of truth).
  • Microsoft Dataverse — acts as the knowledge plane and retrieval surface allowing Copilot Studio to ground responses in enterprise records. Dataverse can be mirrored into Fabric for analytics and kept under tenant governance.
  • Microsoft Copilot Studio — used to author the conversational behavior, define knowledge connectors, test prompts, and set hand‑off logic for human escalation. Copilot Studio supports file grouping, adapters, and the Model Context Protocol (MCP) when needed.
  • Microsoft Teams — the UI surface where agents interact with the assistant (chat, messaging extensions, tabs).
  • Power Platform / Power Automate / APIs — used to trigger controlled actions like cancellations or ticket creation, subject to RBAC and approval flows.

How a typical query flows​

  • Agent asks a question in Teams (for example, “What’s the ship date for SO12345?”).
  • Copilot Studio maps the query to an intent and retrieves authoritative facts from Dataverse/Dynamics via secure connectors.
  • The assistant returns the grounded data (e.g., shipment status, tracking URL) along with provenance and suggested next steps.
  • If an action is required (e.g., cancel order), the agent initiates a pre‑approved Power Automate flow or creates a ticket for human intervention.

Key platform realities to verify during procurement​

  • Connector scope: Confirm which Dynamics tables/fields are exposed and whether payment/PCI data are redacted for chat.
  • Identity and access: Enforce SSO, MFA, Conditional Access, and least‑privilege permissions for PII/PCI queries.
  • Observability: Enable OpenTelemetry traces and robust logging for each agent interaction to support audits and incident response.

Business impact — realistic KPIs and expectations​

Implementations like this usually aim for measurable operational gains rather than lofty transformation rhetoric. Reasonable targets for an early, constrained rollout include:
  • 20–40% reduction in Average Handle Time (AHT) for routine order inquiries.
  • Increase in First Contact Resolution (FCR) for data‑centric queries.
  • Fewer context switches per interaction (fewer app switches).
  • Scaled agent capacity without hiring (reallocating time to higher‑value, relationship tasks).
Short pilots (6–12 weeks) with clearly defined baseline metrics and success criteria are recommended to avoid overpromising and to measure real benefit.

Governance, security and compliance: the real constraints​

Data sensitivity and PII/PCI exposure​

Order data often includes addresses, phone numbers, payment status and last‑four card digits — all of which require strict access controls. Any conversational surface that surfaces payment or PII must:
  • Apply least‑privilege access for connectors and limit the agent’s ability to display full card or account numbers.
  • Redact or mask sensitive fields in chat transcripts when not needed for resolution.
  • Ensure encrypted transit and at‑rest protections meet PCI and local privacy obligations.

Auditability and provenance​

A practical Copilot deployment must show where each answer came from. Agents should annotate responses with provenance text (e.g., “Order status pulled from Dynamics 365 at 10:12 UTC”) and keep immutable logs for audit and dispute resolution. This is especially important in commerce scenarios where incorrect guidance can have financial impact.

Model hallucination risk and grounding​

Even when connected to authoritative systems, agents can err if prompt engineering or retrieval settings are lax. Constraining the agent to transactional queries and forcing explicit data reads (rather than general LLM inference over open knowledge) reduces hallucination risk. Design principle: grounded answers + human‑in‑the‑loop for exceptions.

Ongoing cost & consumption control​

Copilot Studio and retrieved model calls consume metered resources (model tokens, connector calls). Procurement should demand cost transparency, quotas, and alerting to prevent runaway costs from elastic usage during peak periods. Staged rollouts with consumption monitoring are standard best practice.

Practical rollout and operational checklist​

The implementation playbook below compresses vendor playbooks, Microsoft guidance and channel experience into an actionable sequence.
  • Discovery and scope definition
  • Identify the top 10 order-related intents (status, shipment tracking, payment status, cancellations, delivery ETA, return initiation).
  • Agree on explicit success metrics (AHT improvement, FCR uplift, no increased PII exposure).
  • Minimum viable pilot (6–12 weeks)
  • Build a constrained Copilot Studio agent scoped to read‑only order lookups first.
  • Publish to a small Teams pilot group (5–15 agents).
  • Instrument tracing and cost logging.
  • Governance and compliance gating
  • Enforce Conditional Access and role‑based connector scopes.
  • Set transcript retention and redaction policies.
  • Conduct a red‑team test for information disclosure and prompt injection scenarios.
  • Operationalize escalation
  • Define handoff flows when the agent cannot resolve or detects anomaly.
  • Provide a ‘confirm before action’ UX for any write operation (cancellations, refunds).
  • Measure, iterate, expand
  • After meeting KPIs, broaden agent capabilities to include controlled actions or knowledge types.
  • Maintain a staged publishing pipeline (staging → test → production) with change logs.

Strengths and limitations: balanced analysis​

Notable strengths​

  • Immediate, practical ROI: Narrowly scoped agents that surface ERP facts in Teams deliver fast operational improvements without major system rewrites.
  • Platform fit: Copilot Studio + Dataverse + Teams is a supported pattern in Microsoft’s ecosystem, enabling secure connectors, action flows and observability.
  • Repeatability: Once built, similar agents can be deployed across regions and business units with controlled governance and minor adjustments.

Potential risks and limitations​

  • Governance gaps: Uncontrolled data exposure, insufficient access control, or lax logging can amplify regulatory and reputational risk.
  • Hallucination and ambiguous answers: Without strict grounding and provenance, agents risk returning misleading information.
  • Operational brittleness: If the agent uses “computer use” or UI automation for legacy systems, changes to external UIs can break automation and increase maintenance overhead.
  • Vendor lock and cost surprises: Metered model use and proprietary publishing pipelines can create ongoing expense and exit complexity if not contractually managed.

Procurement questions every CIO should ask​

When evaluating vendor proposals or partner deliverables for a Copilot‑style agent, insist on answers to these specific questions:
  • What exact Dynamics 365 tables/fields will the agent access and which of those are masked/redacted in chat?
  • How is user identity and consent enforced when the agent returns PII or payment information?
  • Where are transcripts and logs stored, for how long, and who can access them?
  • What is the model hosting topology (tenant, region, hyperscaler) and does it meet data‑residency requirements?
  • Are there guardrails to prevent prompt injection or unauthorized action execution?
  • Can the agent be exported/migrated if we switch partners or providers? What exit clauses protect our customizations?

What to watch next: signals that indicate success or trouble​

  • Rapid, measurable AHT improvements and reduced app switching among agents (positive signal).
  • Absence of incidents tied to PII/PCI leakage after rollout (positive signal).
  • Rising consumption without correlated KPI improvement — signals cost inefficiency or poor prompt/cue design (warning).
  • Any regulatory inquiries, customer disputes citing incorrect agent guidance, or red‑team failures that expose data (serious red flags).

Cross‑checking the claims​

  • The public announcement and press distribution confirm Sunrise Technologies’ launch of the Sales Order Assistant and describe its role and feature set.
  • Microsoft product documentation and Copilot Studio release notes validate the core technical pattern used — Copilot Studio can integrate Dataverse and publish agents to Teams, and Microsoft has introduced features (file grouping, Dataverse as enterprise knowledge, computer use) that make these agent scenarios practical.
  • Jaipur Living’s corporate materials corroborate the company’s artisan network and brand claims, but corporate scale statements (e.g., “world’s largest”) are company assertions and should be treated as such without independent market share analysis. The procurement team should request independent verification for any critical third‑party claims used in contracting or risk assessment.

Final assessment — pragmatic optimism​

Sunrise Technologies’ Sales Order Assistant is a textbook example of a pragmatic, low‑risk first step toward operationalizing Copilot‑style agents for commerce and supply‑chain organizations. By constraining scope to order‑centric queries, publishing into Teams, and grounding answers in Dynamics 365 via Dataverse, the project follows recommended enterprise design patterns that favor rapid wins and controlled governance.
That said, the project’s success depends entirely on three areas that often determine outcomes: governance, provenance, and cost control. Organizations adopting similar approaches should insist on explicit access controls, immutable logging, and measurable KPIs from day one — and run a short, instrumented pilot rather than a broad production rollout.

Quick starter checklist for IT leads (one‑page)​

  • Define 10 top intents and success metrics (AHT, FCR).
  • Build a read‑only pilot agent for Teams (6–12 weeks).
  • Enforce SSO + Conditional Access + RBAC for Dataverse connectors.
  • Add provenance tags to all agent responses and enable OpenTelemetry tracing.
  • Red‑team the agent for prompt injection and data leakage.
  • Monitor model and connector consumption; set quota alerts.
  • Document exit & migration clauses in the MSA.
This checklist converts vendor promises into verifiable project tasks and protects procurement and security teams from common operational pitfalls.

Sunrise Technologies’ announcement reflects a practical, repeatable path for enterprises to put AI agents into production where they deliver clear, measurable business value — provided the implementation is governed, auditable, and carefully scoped. The Sales Order Assistant is not a revolution; it is an incremental, important step in the enterprise AI journey that, done correctly, will free human agents to do more valuable work while keeping the transaction data where it belongs: secure, accountable, and auditable.

Source: The Malaysian Reserve https://themalaysianreserve.com/2025/10/16/sunrise-technologies-launches-ai-agent-for-jaipur-living/
 

Back
Top