Unlocking Power: Why Linux Tools in WSL Boost Windows Productivity

When Microsoft first unveiled the Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL), it signaled a major shift in how professionals and enthusiasts could harness both Windows and Linux tools within a single, seamless environment. No longer restricted to the moats separating the two operating systems, developers, sysadmins, and power users gained unprecedented flexibility. As WSL matured—with dramatic speed and compatibility upgrades through versions 1 and 2—it quickly became apparent that certain open-source tools outperformed their Windows-native counterparts when run through this bridge. This is not always a reflection of shortcomings in Windows software, but often the result of Linux’s maturity, philosophy, and focus on efficiency in the developer tooling ecosystem.

The Case for Using WSL Tools on Windows​

WSL’s key advantage lies in its ability to expose the strengths of the Linux environment inside Windows, allowing direct access to a treasure trove of established command-line utilities, shell environments, and programming languages. Microsoft’s documentation confirms that WSL can run nearly all Linux command-line tools, utilities, and applications without the overhead of a virtual machine, thanks to the integration with the Windows kernel and file system.
Major technology sites—including XDA Developers, ZDNet, and The Verge—have consistently reported that a combination of performance improvements, native-like behavior, and a vast library of software packages makes WSL a competitive choice, even for those comfortably rooted in the Windows ecosystem. But which tools see the most gain? Below, we dig into four standout tools that are reported to be truly better in WSL than in their original Windows forms.

Git: Enhanced Version Control with Native-Like Performance​

Git has long been the backbone of open-source contribution and professional software development. While Windows users have access to tools like Git for Windows and GUIs such as GitHub Desktop, running Git within WSL exposes a range of genuine benefits. According to XDA’s review and backed up by developer forums and GitHub discussions:

• File System Handling: Linux handles symbolic links, permissions, and case sensitivity natively—key for advanced Git operations. Windows file systems, while flexible, can falter with symlinks and case conflicts, causing headaches for teams that share code between platforms.
• Bash Integration: Bash scripting on Linux is fluid, robust, and fundamentally integrated with the entire environment. In WSL, users can chain Git commands with bash one-liners, leverage Unix utilities like grep, and create complex automations—workflows that are more cumbersome or entirely unavailable in the Windows shell.
• Speed Gains: Performance benchmarks cited by developers show that Git actions (such as cloning, status, or pull) are consistently faster in WSL, especially when repositories are stored in the WSL/Linux file system rather than the mounted Windows drives. This boost comes from eliminating the overhead of file system translation.

These points are corroborated by Microsoft’s own documentation, which emphasizes better compatibility and recommends WSL for complex Git workflows involving symbolic links or case-sensitive files. The only notable downside: the lack of a graphical interface within WSL—some users may miss the GUI offered by tools like SourceTree or GitHub Desktop. However, many developers working in larger teams and CI/CD environments rely on command-line automation, making this less of a concern.

Zsh and Oh My Zsh: A Terminal Experience that Outshines Windows Shells​

Anyone who spends significant time in the terminal knows the importance of comfort and customization. Windows ships with Command Prompt and PowerShell, both powerful in their own right, but they struggle to match the customizability, plugin ecosystem, and sheer joy of use provided by Zsh—especially when paired with Oh My Zsh.

• Customization and Plugins: Oh My Zsh, a community-driven framework for managing Zsh configuration, brings autosuggestions, syntax highlighting, and hundreds of plugins and themes. Many of these plugins offer productivity shortcuts, Git information in the prompt, and more.
• Native Tooling: With Zsh in WSL, users have deep integration with Linux command-line tools (ls, grep, find, etc.), which are faster and often more feature-complete than their Windows equivalents.
• Aliases and Scriptability: Creating aliases and small scripts is fast and intuitive in Zsh, and these can be chained with the rest of the Unix toolset.

While PowerShell 7 is cross-platform and undeniably powerful—capable of advanced object manipulation and scripting—its syntax remains alien to many. Zsh, on the other hand, builds upon Bash (which dominates Linux and macOS), easing the learning curve for those coming from any UNIX-like background. Multiple tech reviewers have judged Zsh with Oh My Zsh on WSL as a productivity win, especially for developers and anyone managing Linux servers alongside Windows PCs.
Users do need to be mindful, however, that not all Windows paths and programs are seamlessly accessible from Zsh within WSL. For workflows heavily reliant on Windows executables, PowerShell might remain preferable.

Vim and Neovim: Keyboard-First Editing at Its Finest​

Text editors are deeply personal choices, and the Vim family—including the modern Neovim fork—commands a fanatical following. Windows users can run GVim or Neovim’s native executables, but the integration and experience within WSL are consistently lauded as superior.

• Lightweight and Fast: Terminal Vim/Neovim loads almost instantly inside WSL. There’s less overhead than running a native GUI version on Windows, and memory usage is minimal. This is particularly noticeable for users editing large codebases or log files.
• Extensibility: WSL’s full Linux environment means plugin management tools like Vim-Plug work seamlessly. Language servers, code completion, Git integration, and UI enhancements all behave as they would on any Linux distribution.
• Seamless Tool Integration: Tasks like searching within files (grep, ack, ag) or applying mass text transformations (awk, sed) are straightforward and fast inside WSL. Power users will appreciate the ability to run shell commands directly within the editor and capture or manipulate their output effortlessly.

The primary caveat is the lack of built-in graphical UI—Vim/Neovim in WSL is terminal-driven. However, several guides document how to use VS Code’s Remote WSL extension to combine the best of both worlds: rich GUI on the desktop, pure Linux muscle under the hood.

FFMpeg: Audio and Video Processing with Raw Speed and Versatility​

Audio and video processing have long been fields where Linux tools shine. FFMpeg, the legendary open-source encoder and converter, is available as a Windows binary, but the WSL version brings distinct advantages:

• Better Performance: Reports from power users and benchmarks suggest that FFMpeg on WSL can process files faster, with smoother access to file system resources and direct access to Linux-only libraries and codecs.
• Scriptability and Automation: Combining FFMpeg with Bash scripts in WSL allows users to automate batch tasks (such as converting file formats or extracting audio from hundreds of videos) far more easily than through Windows batch files or PowerShell scripts—though PowerShell capabilities have been growing in recent years.
• Access to Rare Codecs: Some codecs and libraries, available or easier to build under Linux, can be compiled or installed directly on WSL, extending FFMpeg’s utility for dealing with obscure or proprietary formats. This point is verified in FFMpeg’s own community documentation and forums, which routinely cite difficulties with Windows builds for less common features.
• No GUI, but High Flexibility: Many Windows users miss the convenience of a graphical video editor, but FFMpeg’s command-line muscle is unmatched for automated encoding, compression, or conversion jobs.

The lack of GUI integration is a drawback, especially for those less comfortable with the command line. However, the advantage is clear for professionals and automation scenarios.

Notable Mentions: grep, awk, sed, Python, SSH​

While not exhaustively covered here, several core Linux utilities are simply best in breed when experienced on their native turf—even if that “turf” is running inside WSL on a Windows laptop.

• grep, awk, sed: These pillars of text manipulation are fundamentally faster and richer on Linux, with more up-to-date features and broader application compatibility in scripting and pipelines.
• Python: Although Windows Python installs (via the Microsoft Store or official binaries) are sufficient for most use cases, Linux makes module management, virtual environments, and compatibility far easier—particularly for data science and machine learning workflows that rely on native code or external libraries.
• SSH: Managing remote connections, tunneling, and port forwarding is frictionless with OpenSSH in WSL—an area where Windows has improved recently, but still lags in familiarity and breadth.

Why Performance and Flexibility Matter​

One of the running themes in comparative reviews and user testimonials is the increased performance and reduced friction of running these tools in WSL. Several factors contribute to this edge:

• Native File System Access: Linux was built from the ground up for process efficiency and developer workflows. When tools run directly in WSL’s ext4-backed file system, they bypass many of the translation hurdles required to interpret NTFS permissions, symbolic links, and case sensitivity.
• Up-to-Date Packages: The Linux package ecosystem (via apt, yum, or Homebrew for Linux) is robust. Users receive faster updates, critical bug fixes, and the ability to build or customize tools from source.
• Automation Potential: Bash and other Linux shells foster workflows where tools are chained together in powerful one-liners and scripts, an approach that’s been the backbone of UNIX philosophy for decades.

Benchmarks published by respected dev blogs and Microsoft’s own WSL documentation confirm these insights: routine operations like directory traversal, search, and editable scripting are quicker and less resource intensive on Linux-native binaries than those ported or recompiled for Windows.

Caveats and Considerations​

Despite overwhelming evidence that many tools run better in WSL, there are a few caveats—and reasons to stick with native Windows solutions under certain circumstances.

• Graphical Interface Shortcomings: WSL is still largely command-line centric. Even though WSLg (available in Windows 11) allows some Linux GUI apps to run, the integration isn’t always as fluid or performant as native Windows applications.
• File System Boundaries: Performance drops when accessing files across the Windows/Linux divide (e.g., working with code on the Windows C:\ drive from within WSL). Microsoft recommends keeping project files within the WSL file system (“/home/user/”) for best results.
• Learning Curve: Some of the recommended utilities require familiarity with Linux commands and scripting. While this might be second nature to seasoned Linux users, it represents a hurdle for those more comfortable in Windows environments.
• Interoperability Limits: Windows-native applications and WSL tools can communicate, but some edge cases exist. Not all Windows software can be easily executed or called from within the Linux environment, and vice versa.

The Verdict: Should You Switch?​

For anyone serious about software development, DevOps, media manipulation, or scientific computing, WSL empowers you to leverage some of the world’s best tools—often faster and with fewer bugs or limitations—directly from your Windows workstation. This advantage becomes even more pronounced when you build workflows that chain together multiple utilities via shell scripting. The experience is not just about “having Linux on Windows,” but about amplifying what each OS does best, without dual-booting, heavy virtual machines, or awkward file-sharing workarounds.
At the same time, beginners or users with heavy GUI needs may find some friction. But with Microsoft’s growing investment in WSLg, the barrier is slowly lowering. Those seeking rich graphical interfaces, especially for tasks like video editing, may still benefit from purpose-built Windows software.

Looking Forward: WSL’s Ongoing Evolution​

Microsoft’s own roadmap for WSL includes deeper integration, improved performance across file boundaries, and enhanced GUI support. Each Windows release brings new features, such as automatic updates, direct installation from the Microsoft Store, and improved mounting of external drives. As of early 2024, WSL2’s Linux kernel can be updated directly via Windows Update, and GPU acceleration is available for AI workloads—further blurring the once-stark line between Linux and Windows environments.
For those who haven’t yet experimented with WSL, now is the ideal time. Whether you’re compiling code, manipulating terabytes of data, or batch-encoding video, the tools you need may very well run best in the Linux shell—without ever leaving your Windows desktop.

Practical Tips: Getting Started with WSL Power Tools​

• Install WSL2 with your preferred Linux distribution (Ubuntu and Debian are most popular) via the Windows Store.
• Keep your Linux-side project files inside WSL (see ~ or /home/username/) for speed and reliability.
• Install essential Linux utilities (sudo apt install git zsh vim neovim ffmpeg).
• Try advanced shell environments: After installing Zsh, set it as your default shell and install Oh My Zsh for customization and productivity.
• Explore integration: Use VS Code’s Remote – WSL extension for GUI editing with full Linux backend power.
• Experiment with SSH, grep, awk, sed, and Python—you may find familiar workflows suddenly much easier and faster.

While opinions will always vary on what “best” means, the facts are clear: for a growing array of serious tasks, Linux tools in WSL offer Windows users a tangible advantage—and the future looks brighter still for this hybrid productivity paradigm.

---

Source: XDA I run these 4 tools in WSL and they are better than their Windows counterparts