What is your Windows 7 performance index score?

Discussion in 'Windows 7 Hardware' started by crazy_cjenkins, Jan 11, 2009.

?

What is your Base Score?

  1. 1-1.9

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. 2-2.9

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. 3-3.9

    10.8%
  4. 4-4.9

    19.4%
  5. 5-5.9

    46.2%
  6. 6-6.9

    4.3%
  7. 7-7.9

    19.4%
  1. tempry554

    tempry554 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2010
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    mine is 7.3
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Super Sarge

    Super Sarge New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2009
    Messages:
    1,737
    Likes Received:
    64
    The reason the majority of users are at 5.9 is the the Hard Drive as is my case. If I had a SSD drive would also be in the 7 range area as you can see below
    Memory (RAM) 6.00 GB 7.9 Mushkin Redlines timings 6 7 6 18 at 1603Mhz
    Graphics NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 7.3
    Gaming graphics 3707 MB Total available graphics memory 7.3
    Primary hard disk 1341GB Free (1397GB Total) 5.9
    Component Details Subscore Base score Processor Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz 7.5
     
  3. Krypto

    Krypto Extraordinary Member
    Premium Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2009
    Messages:
    1,107
    Likes Received:
    37
    ok redoing mine with more detail yes everyone in order to go past 5.9 in harddrive you need SSD but they are way to expensive. and i have a dual graphics card setup so my graphics memory is almost 5GB windows performance index does not take dual setups into account.
     

    Attached Files:

  4. cgrim29588

    cgrim29588 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2010
    Messages:
    224
    Likes Received:
    4
    Mine 4.4

    Processor: 4.6
    Memory (Ram): 5.5
    Graphics: 4.4
    Gaming Graphics: 5.4
    Primary Hard Disk: 5.9

    [​IMG]
     
  5. nmsuk

    nmsuk Windows Forum Admin
    Staff Member Premium Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    Messages:
    2,708
    Likes Received:
    195
    Here's mine

    Capture.PNG
     
  6. bassfisher6522

    bassfisher6522 Essential Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2008
    Messages:
    4,878
    Likes Received:
    317
  7. Agent Data

    Agent Data Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2010
    Messages:
    918
    Likes Received:
    42
    Here is mine
     

    Attached Files:

  8. fjgold

    fjgold New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2009
    Messages:
    1,111
    Likes Received:
    60
    Looks like you could use a faster HDD.

    My bottleneck is my video card.
     
    #108 fjgold, May 31, 2010
    Last edited: May 31, 2010
  9. Agent Data

    Agent Data Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2010
    Messages:
    918
    Likes Received:
    42
    I would need a SSD to overcome 5.9
     
  10. Athlonite

    Athlonite New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2009
    Messages:
    792
    Likes Received:
    10
    it would seem we all do even HDD Raid0 arrays only score 5.9 prolly because of the lousy access times with 7200/10000 rpm HDD's as compared to next to nothing for SSD's although i haven't seen any 15k rpm SCSI disks in a Raid0 Array in here yet
     
  11. fjgold

    fjgold New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2009
    Messages:
    1,111
    Likes Received:
    60
    I wonder if big SSD's every will become as inexpensive as HDDs.
     
  12. Athlonite

    Athlonite New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2009
    Messages:
    792
    Likes Received:
    10
    maybe in 10yrs you'll be able to buy an 500GB SSD for $150 :p and so maybe in ten yrs when my Raid0 array goes toes up I'll think about getting one or two :eek:
     
  13. Agent Data

    Agent Data Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2010
    Messages:
    918
    Likes Received:
    42
    Yes, all platter drives are capped to 5.9 WEI - I remember 25 years ago I saw HDDs in repair labs having two R/W heads on each platter side (2x2 heads up/down on one platter) effectively halving the access time by switching heads to reach far sectors. However, this kind of smart design is nowadays unthinkable coz no one is able to think outside the box.

    In a sense we've been far more advanced in the time back then
     
    #113 Agent Data, Jun 1, 2010
    Last edited: Jun 1, 2010
  14. Athlonite

    Athlonite New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2009
    Messages:
    792
    Likes Received:
    10
    yeah i can remember reading something about that although if I remember right the reason it wasn't used is it wasn't a cost effective design HDD's would have been double the price for only an modicum of performance increase far better to work on spindle speeds and R/W head designs for better efficiency/cost
     
  15. Agent Data

    Agent Data Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2010
    Messages:
    918
    Likes Received:
    42
    At that time HDDs where the size of a table and data technology was still heavy and too limited - so an increasing spin speed indeed did the trick for the time being. BTW, those HDDs were real but rare. I saw a couple of them opened for head-crash repair :rolleyes:

    However, nowadays this would boost 3.5 HDDs performance easily by 50% and the cost factor is minimal - let such a HDD cost $10 more...so what? :D
     
  16. Athlonite

    Athlonite New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2009
    Messages:
    792
    Likes Received:
    10
    yeah i remember seeing the HDD at my sisters old work it had its own sound proof and climate controlled room was as loud as a jet plane and the platers were open to the air amazing to watch it work but by todays standards it's slower than a wet week stored bugger all and cost an inordinate amount of money and once a week got backed up to 12" floppy disks a job my sister hated with a vengeance...

    i agree to a point about it helping newer 3.5" HDD's but i think that is one reason they are going the way of SSD smaller faster cooler and uses far less power now all they need do is catch up to HDD's capacity and cost per GB and we'd be sweet I just hate the wait though right now here an Kingston SSDNow V+ Series SNVP325-S2 512GB costs $2,676.74NZD and yet the equivelent sized HDD Western Digital Caviar Black WD5001AALS 32MB 500GB is only a poultry $84.62NZD thats 31.6x the price of the HDD :eek::eek::eek:
     
  17. bassfisher6522

    bassfisher6522 Essential Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2008
    Messages:
    4,878
    Likes Received:
    317
    #117 bassfisher6522, Feb 14, 2011
    Last edited: Feb 14, 2011
  18. Super Sarge

    Super Sarge New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2009
    Messages:
    1,737
    Likes Received:
    64
    Here is mine
    Component Details Subscore Base score Processor Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz 7.5
    5.9 Determined by lowest subscore
    Memory (RAM) 12.0 GB 7.8
    Graphics NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 7.3
    Gaming graphics 4095 MB Total available graphics memory 7.3
    Primary hard disk 1338GB Free (1397GB Total) 5.9
     
    #118 Super Sarge, Feb 14, 2011
    Last edited: Feb 14, 2011
  19. bassfisher6522

    bassfisher6522 Essential Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2008
    Messages:
    4,878
    Likes Received:
    317
  20. Trouble

    Trouble Noob Whisperer

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2009
    Messages:
    13,845
    Likes Received:
    833
    #120 Trouble, Feb 14, 2011
    Last edited: Feb 14, 2011

Share This Page

Loading...