Windows 11 24H2 August Update Triggers NVMe Storage Regression (KB5063878)

Microsoft’s latest cumulative for Windows 11 24H2 has been tied to a small but serious cluster of storage failures that can make NVMe SSDs disappear during heavy writes and, in a handful of cases, leave data unreadable — a scare that underscores why updating and backup discipline still matters more than ever. rview
Windows cumulative updates are meant to patch security holes and smooth out performance, but the August cumulative for Windows 11 24H2 (identified as KB5063878 / OS Build 26100.4946) has been linked by independent testers and community reporting to a reproducible storage regression: under sustained large sequential writes some NVMe SSDs can stop responding, vanish from the OS, and sometimes return corrupted or unreadable after reboot. Microsoft published the update package and standard install guidance, but the initial release note did not list a global known‑issue entry for this particular storage symptom at the time early reports surfaced.
Multiple community cialist outlets described the same symptom profile: drives disappearing during continuous bulk writes (commonly reported when copying or backing up roughly 50 GB or more), temporary recovery on reboot for some systems, and permanent controller/SMART unreadability for a small subset. The pattern points to an interaction between the OS storage stack and certain SSD controller/firmware combinations under heavy I/O, rather than a simple one-off driver crash.

---

What we know so far​

• Microsoft the August cumulative update for Windows 11 24H2; community testing tied the package to storage regressions in some systems.
• Symptom pattern: NVMe SSDs stop responding and disappear fr Disk Management during sustained large writes; written files may be corrupted; reboots sometimes restore visibility but not always data integrity.
• Reproducible trigger reported by multiple independent testers: long, heavy seque large copies) — often cited around the ~50 GB sustained write mark.
• Early analysis suggests the failure is an I/O-profile-triggered interaction between Windows’ storage dular SSD controller/firmware implementations. Vendor firmware fixes resolved similar incidents in prior update cycles, but the exact hardware list for this event remains incomplete.

---

Technical analysis: why heavy writes expose controller/firmware weaknesses​

Modern NVMe SSDs depend on a complex mix of NAND management, and OS-level drivers to coordinate caching, wear‑leveling, and thermal/queue management. Under normal desktop workloads the stack behaves predictably; sustained, large sequential writes stress different code paths — extended buffer usage, prolonged garbage‑collection cycles, elevated temperature and power states, and heavy DMA traffic.
When an SSD controller’s firmware has an unhandled edge case or a race condition, that stress profile can cause the controller to lock up, stop responding to the host, or return inconsistent telemetry. From the host’s perspective a locked controller looks like a disappeared drive; controller metadata or SMART registers may be unreadable until the drive undergoes a hardware reset or receives a firmware fix. Community evidence for this event aligns with that mechanism: the failure occurs under sustained writes and disproportionately affects drives using specific controller families in which a firmware-level bug would explain the symptoms better than a Windows-only driver defect.
Two technical patterns worth noting:

• Host‑side policy changes such as how Host Memory Buffer (HMB) is managed or how the OS schedules and batchehe load profile the controller sees. Changes in HMB handling have been implicated in previous Windows update incidents with certain SSD models.
• Firmware bugs or controller microcode faults are frequently the ultimate root cause when drives “vanish” only under heavy sustained load; these are typically addresseddates rather than an OS patch alone. Independent testing and past vendor responses support this traceback.

---

Who appears to be affected​

The incident appears limited to a small percentage of users and specific hardware combinations rather than a mass failure. Community reports and independentted machines are predominantly running Windows 11 24H2 with the August cumulative (KB5063878) applied.

• The trigger is a particular I/O profile (sustained, large sequential writes). Ordinary casual use typically doesn’t reproduce the problem.
• Early reproductions implicate a subset of NVMe controllers/firmwart vendor/model list remains incomplete and is being refined as testers collect telemetry. Some community threads have suggested certain controll than others, but at the time of reporting that linkage is probable rather than confirmed by vendor statements. Treat controller-brand claims with caution until vendors publish firmware advisories.

Because the hardware landscape is diverse, the responsible finding is that the issue is hardware-and-firmware sensitive and not a universal Windows failure.

---

Symptoms to watch for (practical checklist)​

• Long copy/backup jobs that end with the desaring from File Explorer, Disk Management, or Device Manager.
• SMART/controller telemetry that becomes inaccessible or returns errors after the failure window.
• Files written during the failure window that are corrupted or unreadable after reboot.
• Systems that recover the drive visibility after a reboot but report missing or coffected write session.

If you see any of these, minimize further writes to the affected drive immediate mitigation and triage (what to do now)
If you’re worried or already seeing issues, trority data‑integrity incident. The following steps emphasize safety and data preservation.

• Stop heavy writes immediately. Pausefile‑copy jobs that write many gigabytes to your NVMe/HDD. Continued writes can worsen corruption.
• Do not initialize, format, or quick‑format a drive that becomes inaccessible or shows errors; that can overwrite data structures and make recovery harder.
• Make a forensic image of the drive before attempting repair if the data is critical. Use a dedicated disk-cloning tool to create a sector‑level copy onto a safe drive. This preserves your best chance foot / safe boot: Some users report temporary restoration of visibility after a reboot. If you must reboot, prefer a clean shutdown and avoid reuse of the drive u
• Check Device Manager and Disk Management for errors; do not initialize an unknown disk. Record any error codes and SMART outputs.
• Use vendor diagnostic tools to query the drive if possible (CrystalDiskInfo, ols return unreadable SMART or controller info, that’s a sign of low‑level controller failure.

---

How to roll back the update (what IT admins and advanced users need to know)​

Microsoft’nclude a servicing model where the Latest Cumulative Update (LCU) can be removed — but removal of an LCU is different from uninstalling ways supported via the Control Panel "Uninstall updates" GUI. The documented, supported method for removing an LCU is via DISM Remove‑Package, which is how administrators can roll back the package if : rolling back an LCU removes the security and bug fixes it contained and should be a staged, documented step.
A safe rollback sequence:

• Document installed updates and collect system logs.
• Suspend large writes and backups.
• Create a full system backup or disk image if you can.
• Use DISM to list and remove the LCU package per Microsoft guidance. (Ensure you are following current Microsoft documentation for your build and servicing stack.)

For non‑administrators or home users, the practical alternative is to pause Windows Update and wait for Microsoft and vendors to issue official mitigg sustained large write operations on systems you suspect may be vulnerable.

---

Recovery options for affected files and drives​

If a drive becomes inaccessible or shows corruption:

• If data is critical, stop all activity and consult a professional data‑recovery service that can handle NVMe media and controller‑level issues. Attempting DIY fmage.
• If you want to try low‑risk steps yourself, boot a Linux live USB to see whether the drive is visible to another OS (Linux tooling sometimes bypasses Windows‑specific driver paths and can expose the device in read‑only mode). Do not mount read/write unless you have an image.
• Vendor tool updates: monitor your SSD vendor’s support pages. If a firmware update is issued that addresses controller lockups, apply it only after imaging the drive or on a replacement/blank device; firmware updates can fail and should be done with appropware updates have fixed past similar incidents.

---

Microsoft and vendor response — current status and what to expect​

At the time independent reporting surfaced, Microsoft had not globally listed the storage regression as a known issue on the KB release page, although they ded to similar incidents by coordinating with drive vendors and issuing either rolling updates, guidance, or mitigations. Community testing and specialist outlets have reproduced the failure pattern and flagged it for vendor attention; historically, similar drive-specific disappear/lockup issues were resolved by drive manufactureupdates after reproducing the error. Expect a two-track resolution path:

• Microsoft may issue an acknowledgement and either a targeted rollback for the LCU or a follow-up cumulative that mitigates the host-side behavior.
• SSD vendors will test and, if needed, publish firmware updates to correct controller/firmware edge cases exposed by the update’s workload profile. Firmware fixes resolved similar problems in prior incidents.

Until vendors publish firm advisories, claims about specific controller vendors being the root cause should be treated as probable community correlation rather than definitive proof. Independent reporting is converging, but formal vendor confirmation is the gold standard.

---

Risk analysis and broader implications​

Why this matters beyond a handful of users:

• Data integrity risk: can result in irreversible file loss for users performing large backups or VM image writes. The financial and operational impact for businesses that rely on bulk data transfers is significant.
• Update trust erents where cumulative updates cause regressions on popular hardware create user reluctance to update promptly, which paradoxically can leave devices exposed to security risks. Balancing rapid security patching with thorough hardware compatibility testing is essential.
• Sup the failure emphasizes how tightly coupled OS updates are to third‑party firmware and how important coordinated testing matrices between OS vendors and device manufacturers are for reliability.

Strengths in the response ecosystem: community testers quickly reproduce and document edge cases, and vendor firmware channels have hiixes for controller bugs. Weaknesses: the staged rollout model and limited initial documentation can delay a clear, actionable message for end users.

---

Recommendations for home users and IT administrators​

For home users:

• Pause large backup or sync jobs until you confirm your SSD model and current ve must run a large transfer, do it to a known-good external drive that isn’t the OS or primary data volume.
• Keep recent, verified backups in at least two places (local image + cloud or external). Backups are the only relist corruption introduced by platform regressions.
• Monitor vendor support pages and Microsoft Release Health for updates. Apply firmware updates only after imaging or on spare hardware when data is critical.

For IT administrators:

• Stage the August 24H2 cumulative in a preproduction ring and run workload profiles including large sustained writes and backup jobs. Validate against representative SSD models present in your fleet.
• Implement update rings and holdback policies for mission‑critical storage hosts until vendors confirm compatibility.
• Document rollback procedures ancovery plan that includes imaging affected devices before remediation or firmware application.

---

What to watch next​

• Formal vendor advisories and firmware updates targeted at contated by community reporting. Firmware is the most likely permanent fix if the root cause is a controller edge case.
• Microsoft Release Health / KB revision: w“known issue” entry and any follow-up servicing guidance from Microsoft that either mitigates the host behavior or provides targeted removal instructions for the LCU.
• Community test suites and reproducible reports that rend write thresholds that trigger the failure; these will help admins determine exposure.

---

Bottom line​

This is a iggered storage regression tied to a recent Windows 11 24H2 cumulative update and reproduced by independent testers. While the number of affected users ihe Windows install base, the impact is high when it hits — potential disappearance of NVMe drives and file corruption during large writes. Immediate actions are straightforward and conservative: stop heavy writes, image drives if id firmware updates until imaging is complete, and follow vendor and Microsoft advisories. Administrators should stage updates against representative storage hardware with large‑write workloads to catch this class of bug before broad cident is a sharp reminder that even in 2025, update safety is a balancing act between rapid security patching and the painstaking compatibility testing required across stems. Stay cautious, back up, and treat large writes to potentially affected drives as a test case rather than routine maintenance until vendors and Microsoft close the loop.

---

Source: PCWorld Latest Windows update is borking storage drives for some users

 

[ChatGPT]

Microsoft’s August cumulative for Windows 11 24H2 has been linked by independent testers and multiple specialist outlets to a reproducible storage regression: under sustained, large sequential writes some NVMe SSDs can stop responding, disappear from the operating system, and — in a minority of reports — return unreadable SMART/controller telemetry or show file corruption after reboot. (support.microsoft.com, tomshardware.com)

Background / Overview​

Microsoft released the August 12, 2025 cumulative update identified as KB5063878 (OS Build 26100.4946) for Windows 11 version 24H2. On its public support page Microsoft lists the package contents and standard installation guidance and—at the time community reports began to surface—stated it was “not currently aware of any issues with this update.” (support.microsoft.com)
Within days of the rollout, hobbyist testers and specialist outlets reproduced a consistent failure profile: during extended, sequential write operations—commonly when copying or installing very large files or folders—the target NVMe drive stops responding and vanishes from Windows (Device Manager, Disk Management and File Explorer). In many reproductions the controller telemetry or SMART attributes are unreadable to host utilities; files written during the fault window may be incomplete or corrupted. Community testing often reproduces the fault near the ~50 GB continuous write mark and when controller utilization climbs to roughly 60% or higher. (borncity.com, tomshardware.com)
Windows‑focused community channels and forum threads collected the early evidence, produced test logs, and aggregated device reports—forming the primary dataset investigators are using until vendors or Microsoft publish consolidated telemetry. Those forum digests stress an urgent, pragmatic guidance set: back up data, avoid heavy writes on recently patched systems with suspect SSDs, and stage enterprise rollouts until fixes or vendor guidance are published.

---

What the failure looks like — symptom fingerprint​

• Sudden disappearance of an NVMe drive from File Explorer, Device Manager, and Disk Management during a long file transfer. (tomshardware.com)
• Vendor utilities and SMART readouts stop responding or return unreadable telemetry.
• Reboot sometimes restores device visibility temporarily; a minority of reports describe drives that do not return without vendor intervention.
• Files written during the incident may be partially written, corrupted, or lost.

The reproducibility across independent testers—coupled with an identical workload trigger (large sequential writes)—points to a narrow but high‑impact regression: a host-side change in the storage stack that exposes firmware/controller edge cases under sustained I/O stress. Community investigations have repeatedly observed a similar operational fingerprint: controller lockup, unreadable SMART, and temporary or permanent disappearance from the OS namespace. (borncity.com)

---

Technical analysis — why sustained writes can expose firmware bugs​

Modern NVMe SSDs combine NAND flash, controller firmware, and host OS drivers. Under brief, bursty desktop workload the system generally behaves predictably; extended sequential writes exercise different internal paths: prolonged DRAM/cache pressure, extended garbage collection and wear‑leveling activity, thermal throttling thresholds, and constant DMA queues.

• Many DRAM‑less SSDs rely on Host Memory Buffer (HMB) to borrow small slices of system RAM for mapping structures and caching. A change to HMB allocation policies or timing can change the host/firmware interaction surface and expose latent race conditions in controller firmware. Earlier 24H2 rollout episodes illustrated how HMB allocation changes produced BSOD loops on certain models; the present regression fits the same host/firmware interaction class even if the triggering mechanism differs.
• Tests reported by independent experts show the fault typically appears after sustained writes of ~50 GB or when controller utilization approaches high sustained loads. That pattern is consistent with a controller‑side resource exhaustion or an unhandled caching edge case that manifests only under prolonged pressure. (borncity.com, tomshardware.com)
• Community collations flag Phison-based controllers (especially DRAM‑less variants) as overrepresented among affected samples, but reports are not strictly limited to a single controller family. The observed distribution suggests firmware sensitivity in certain controller firmwares rather than a Windows-only bug, although host changes likely triggered the fault pathway. This distinction matters for remediation: fixes may require firmware updates from drive vendors, a targeted OS mitigation from Microsoft, or both. (borncity.com, tomshardware.com)

Because the failure produces unreadable controller telemetry in some cases, forensic confirmation of a firmware bricking vs. transient controller hang is non-trivial and requires vendor access to controller logs or in‑lab hardware resets. Community writers emphasize that there is no high‑confidence, consolidated list of affected models and firmware revisions yet—only aggregated community evidence and targeted vendor advisories where available.

---

Who appears to be affected​

Early patterns and replicated tests point to higher susceptibility among:

• DRAM‑less NVMe SSDs using Phison controllers. (borncity.com)
• Certain Western Digital / SanDisk models that previously showed HMB sensitivity during the 24H2 feature rollout (that earlier episode was mitigated by vendor firmware and temporary host blocks).
• Some additional SSD and HDD reports surfaced in community testing, but those are fewer and may represent edge cases or separate failure modes. (borncity.com)

Crucially, the available evidence is community‑led and not yet a consolidated, vendor‑verified catalogue. This means exposure is plausible across families and vendors; that uncertainty is why conservative mitigations (backups, staged rollouts, pause large writes) are being recommended.

---

Immediate actions for consumers and power users​

• Stop heavy writes on machines that have installed the August 12, 2025 KB5063878 update. Avoid large, uninterrupted transfers (bulk game installs/updates, disk cloning, large archive extraction) until the issue is clarified.
• Back up critical data now to an external device or trusted cloud service. Prioritize files you cannot easily reproduce. Backups are the only reliable defense against write‑time corruption.
• Use SSD vendor tools to check model and firmware and apply firmware updates if the vendor has published a fix—only after taking a verified backup. Firmware updates can resolve controller bugs but carry their own small risks; follow vendor instructions precisely. (tomshardware.com)
• If you must continue using the device for heavy I/O, consider staging the workload to smaller chunks (<50 GB) where possible, and confirm the drive’s behavior in a controlled test before proceeding with mission‑critical transfers.

These are practical, conservative steps that reduce immediate exposure while preserving evidence for vendor diagnostics if a failure occurs. Forum and press guidance converge on the same triage: stop heavy writes, back up, capture diagnostics, and coordinate with vendor support.

---

Enterprise guidance — staging, telemetry and risk management​

• Hold mass deployments: administrators controlling updates through WSUS, SCCM/MECM or similar should stage KB5063878 in a test ring and postpone broad rollout until vendor guidance confirms it’s safe for your fleet. Community reproductions use sustained write tests that can be added to validation suites to exercise crucial storage workloads before mass deployment.
• Increase test coverage: perform controlled sustained sequential writes on representative hardware and firmware revision sets to reproduce the failure in a lab before permitting the update in production. Capture event logs, NVMe vendor diagnostics, and controller telemetry for any triggers.
• Protect backup targets: ensure backup destinations are not the same make/model or vendor family under investigation. If primary backups write to the same vulnerable device, they may be corrupted in the same failure window. Use external or networked targets that are on different hardware.

Microsoft has already acknowledged and mitigated an unrelated deployment issue (WSUS/SCCM error 0x80240069) for this same KB via Known Issue Rollback measures in the past update cycle, showing the company can and will apply targeted servicing controls to limit impact in managed environments. That precedent suggests Microsoft could push a similar block or mitigation if vendor telemetry warrants it.

---

How to diagnose and recover if a drive disappears mid‑write​

• Capture logs immediately: record Event Viewer (System) events and copy any output from vendor utilities. These logs are crucial when reporting to vendors or Microsoft.
• Do not repeatedly reboot in a panic: while a reboot sometimes restores visibility, repeated reinitialization risks further overwriting metadata and complicates forensic recovery. Preserve the state and collect logs first if possible.
• Create an image before repair attempts: if the drive is partially accessible, perform a sector‑level image (read‑only clone) to a different device. Imaging preserves recoverable data and prevents further writes that would reduce recovery chances.
• Use vendor diagnostic tools in read‑only/diagnostic mode to extract controller logs; vendors often have deeper visibility than OS utilities and can sometimes revive or diagnose device states. Contact vendor support with collected logs and timestamps.
• Consider professional recovery if data is critical: if diagnostics fail and the data is vital, escalate to a professional data‑recovery provider rather than performing indiscriminate repair attempts that may decrease recovery odds.

These steps are the practical, evidence‑preserving approach recommended by multiple community analysts and specialist outlets. They prioritize data preservation above quick fixes. (tomshardware.com)

---

What to expect next — remediation pathways​

There are three principal, non‑exclusive remediation paths:

• Vendor firmware update: If the primary root cause is a controller firmware edge case, drive manufacturers will release firmware updates that fix the controller’s handling of prolonged cache or mapping pressure. Historically, similar HMB‑triggered faults were resolved by firmware patches from affected vendors.
• Microsoft mitigation: If the root cause is a host‑side allocation or timing change introduced in the update, Microsoft may publish targeted guidance (registry/workaround) or implement a controlled rollout block for affected hardware IDs using Known Issue Rollback or compatibility hold measures. Microsoft’s prior KIR response for other problems demonstrates this is a feasible path.
• Combined approach: In many past incidents the long‑term remedy combines an OS patch and firmware updates, because the failure often sits at the interaction between host drivers and controller firmware. Community reporting and vendor telemetry usually converge before a combined fix is published.

Expect vendor advisories first for the models they can confirm, and a Microsoft Release Health entry if the company’s telemetry or vendor reports justify a formal known‑issue flag. Independent testing will continue to refine the list of vulnerable models and firmware revisions. (borncity.com)

---

Strengths and weaknesses of the current evidence​

Strengths:

• Multiple independent testers reproduced an identical symptom set under a narrow workload profile, strengthening the causal link to the update and the workload trigger. Published tests and logs show repeatability, not just anecdote. (tomshardware.com, borncity.com)
• Specialist outlets and community forums aggregated model lists, test methodology, and recovery prescriptions that give users and administrators actionable steps rather than speculation.

Weaknesses / risks:

• There is no single, vendor‑verified, consolidated list of affected models and firmware revisions at publication. Community lists are invaluable but incomplete and should not be treated as authoritative until vendors confirm. Claims that a single controller family is the exclusive culprit remain premature.
• Some reports mention permanent device inaccessibility after the fault; whether that represents firmware corruption, hardware failure accelerated by the bug, or unrelated preexisting defects is not yet verifiable without vendor forensic analysis. Those cases should be treated with caution and flagged as unverified pending vendor confirmation.

Where claims remain tentative, the appropriate editorial posture is caution: warn readers of plausible high impact, recommend conservative mitigations, and insist on vendor/Microsoft confirmation before drawing final conclusions.

---

Practical checklist — what to do now (concise)​

• Pause large writes and bulk transfers on systems that installed KB5063878.
• Back up critical files immediately to separate physical devices or cloud.
• Check SSD model and firmware using vendor tools (WD Dashboard, Crucial Storage Executive, Corsair Toolbox, etc.). Apply vendor firmware only after taking backups and reading official advisories. (tomshardware.com)
• For administrators: stage KB5063878 in a test ring, run sustained sequential write tests on representative hardware, and withhold broad deployment until you can validate safety.
• If a device fails during a transfer: collect Event Viewer logs, vendor diagnostic output, and create a bit‑for‑bit image before attempting repair or RMA.

---

Why this matters — the bigger picture​

This episode is a reminder that operating‑system updates interact with hardware at a deep level. SSD architectures increasingly rely on host cooperation mechanisms like HMB; small changes in allocation policy, buffering, or command timing can cascade into firmware edge cases that only appear under stress profiles typical of gamers, content creators, and certain backup/cloning workflows.
For users and IT teams the practical lessons are unchanged:

• Treat cumulative updates with respect and plan staged rollouts for critical systems.
• Maintain robust, independent backups.
• Vendor firmware and coordinated remediation between Microsoft and device makers remain the most reliable path to a durable fix.

---

Conclusion​

The August 12, 2025 KB5063878 rollout has surfaced a narrow but consequential storage regression: sustained large sequential writes can trigger NVMe SSD controllers to stop responding and disappear from Windows, with a real risk of file corruption. Independent tests and specialist reporting consistently reproduce the symptom set and point to a host/firmware interaction—Phison‑family controllers and DRAM‑less designs appear overrepresented among affected samples, but the broader device list remains unverified.
The immediate defensive posture is straightforward and non‑controversial: stop heavy writes, back up critical data, check for vendor firmware updates and apply them only after verified backups, and for administrators stage updates and expand validation suites to include long sequential write workloads. Microsoft and SSD vendors are the authoritative sources for final remediation; community testing will continue to refine the exposure map until vendor confirmations arrive. (support.microsoft.com, tomshardware.com, borncity.com)
The episode underlines a perennial truth of modern computing: updates fix many things but can expose complex, hardware‑dependent edge cases. In such moments, discipline—backups, staged deployment, and measured diagnostics—remains the best form of damage control.

---

Source: Club386 Microsoft Windows 11 24H2 update linked to SSD failure during heavy file transfers | Club386
Source: IT Pro A Windows 11 update bug is breaking SSDs – here’s what you can do to prevent it