Microsoft released Windows 11 Insider Preview Build 26300.8553 to the Experimental channel on May 29, 2026, adding new Start menu controls that let testers hide or show major sections, pick small or large sizing, and conceal account identity details. The change is not a reinvention of Start so much as an admission that Windows 11’s original Start menu traded too much user agency for visual neatness. After years of insisting that the centered, simplified launcher was the modern answer, Microsoft is now rebuilding the case for Windows by giving back pieces of the desktop it took away. The important story is not that the Start menu got a few toggles; it is that Microsoft has rediscovered that Windows loyalty is built in the margins, one small control at a time.
The Windows 11 Start menu has always looked more confident than it behaved. It floated above the centered taskbar, rounded and sparse, as if Microsoft had solved the hard problem of decades of Windows UI inheritance by hiding most of it behind a calmer face. But that confidence came at a price: users lost density, muscle memory, and several kinds of control they had taken for granted in Windows 10.
The new Experimental-channel changes move in the opposite direction. Pinned, Recent, and All can now be managed as separate sections. The Start menu can be set to Automatic, Small, or Large. The account name and profile picture can be hidden for people who present, stream, screen-share, or simply dislike having their identity displayed in a launcher.
None of that sounds revolutionary because none of it should have needed a revolution. The scandal of Windows 11’s Start menu was never that it looked different. It was that Microsoft mistook a default layout for a universal workflow.
This is the distinction that matters for WindowsForum readers. A Start menu is not just a product surface; it is an operating habit. People build personal systems around where icons live, how many clicks it takes to reach a tool, and whether recent files are useful signals or unwanted noise. When Microsoft flattened those choices in 2021, it turned personal computing into a corporate taste test.
The containerization dream proved too difficult to deliver at the time, but the visual language survived. Windows 11 inherited the simplified launcher, the centered taskbar, and the mobile-influenced insistence that fewer visible controls meant a more modern PC. Microsoft carried over the showroom but not the architectural renovation that was supposed to justify it.
That explains why the first Windows 11 Start menu felt oddly underpowered. It was designed for a world in which Windows would behave less like old Windows, but it arrived on machines still running the full mess and glory of Win32, enterprise agents, legacy utilities, Store apps, web apps, and user-created shortcuts. The result was a launcher that looked like a tablet idea imposed on a desktop reality.
The initial October 2021 version of Windows 11 gave users Search, Pinned, and Recommended, but very little authority over how those pieces behaved. You could remove pinned icons and still be left with wasted space. You could dislike Recommended and still have to live around it. You could use Start every day and still feel as if the most personal part of Windows had become one of its least negotiable.
That ambiguity is why the section became such a sore point. In theory, surfacing recent documents and newly installed apps is useful. In practice, Windows users have learned to be suspicious of any system area that can mix personal activity, suggestions, Store discovery, tips, and promotional nudges. The more Microsoft pushes services through Windows, the less patience users have for vague recommendation surfaces.
The new controls acknowledge that problem without fully saying it. Users can now individually toggle recently added apps, recent and suggested files, and tips or app recommendations. That matters because it separates different kinds of content that should never have been treated as one bucket.
A sysadmin may want users to see recently installed line-of-business tools but not tips. A writer may want recent files but not Store suggestions. A privacy-conscious user may want none of it. A developer may live entirely from Search and pinned tools. These are not edge cases; they are normal Windows use cases.
The renaming to Recent also narrows the promise. If Microsoft keeps the section focused on user activity, it has a chance to become useful rather than resented. If it becomes another soft landing zone for engagement experiments, the new label will not save it.
Windows power users are not asking Microsoft to abandon defaults. They are asking Microsoft to stop confusing defaults with destiny. A user who wants a clean Start menu with only pinned apps should not need registry edits, third-party shell replacements, or ritualistic unpinning to get there.
The same applies to the new size controls. Automatic sizing adapts to the display, while Small and Large let users force a preference where possible. This is especially relevant across multi-monitor setups and laptops that move between internal and external displays, where a Start menu that feels reasonable on one screen can feel absurd on another.
The limitation is obvious: these are presets, not true free resizing. Windows 10 let users resize Start more directly, and some longtime users will see Small and Large as a compromise rather than a restoration. They are right. But presets are still better than a launcher that behaves as if 13-inch laptops and 32-inch monitors are merely different viewing distances for the same design.
There is a philosophical difference between “the system adapts for you” and “the system lets you decide.” Windows 11 spent too much time on the former. This build begins to restore the latter.
Displaying identity information in a place as frequently opened as Start creates unnecessary exposure. It may reveal a legal name during a screen share, show a profile photo in a recorded demo, or simply add visual clutter for users who do not need account switching from the launcher. The new option recognizes that privacy is often about reducing incidental disclosure, not just locking down telemetry.
The implementation, at least in early hands-on testing, appears imperfect. Hiding the name and picture can still leave the account button area functionally present, meaning the submenu may remain accessible even if the identity details disappear. That is typical Insider roughness, but it also reflects a broader Windows habit: Microsoft sometimes hides UI elements before fully rethinking why they exist.
Still, the direction is welcome. Account surfaces in Windows have increasingly become places where Microsoft can promote OneDrive, Microsoft accounts, backup prompts, subscriptions, and other service tie-ins. Giving users the ability to reduce that footprint in Start is a small but meaningful retreat from the idea that every OS surface should double as an account billboard.
Bringing All apps inline, with Category, Grid, and List views, made Start feel more like a launcher again. It reduced the sense that Windows 11 was hiding the machine from its owner. The new Experimental controls build on that by allowing All to be shown or hidden alongside Pinned and Recent.
The category view is especially interesting because it reflects Microsoft’s ongoing desire to make app discovery less alphabetic and more semantic. That can help users who do not remember exact app names, but it also introduces the classic problem of automatic organization: the computer’s idea of a category may not match yours. A bad category system is worse than a dumb list because it gives the user a map they cannot edit.
That is why the List and Grid options matter. Microsoft can experiment with intelligence, but it must preserve predictable alternatives. Windows users tolerate novelty best when escape hatches are visible.
That cycle is frustrating, but it is also revealing. Windows 11 launched with a simplified shell that made sense from a design-deck perspective: fewer modes, fewer legacy options, fewer ways for users to create inconsistent layouts. But Windows is not iOS, and the desktop is not a controlled appliance. Its strength is that it absorbs different working styles.
For developers, vertical taskbars can reclaim precious vertical space. For ultrawide monitor users, side placement can be more efficient than a bottom bar. For laptop users, smaller taskbar buttons can mean more usable room for apps. These are not nostalgia requests. They are ergonomic ones.
The Start menu benefits from the same thinking. A smaller Start menu is not merely aesthetic. It changes how interruptive the launcher feels. A Start menu that can be stripped down to pins changes how quickly it can function as a command surface. A full Start menu with All apps visible changes how useful it is for browsing installed software.
Taken together, the taskbar and Start changes suggest Microsoft is relearning an old Windows lesson: customization is not clutter when it maps to real workflows.
That transparency is useful, but it also functions as reputation repair. Windows 11 has not lacked features; it has lacked trust. Users have watched Microsoft add Copilot entry points, web-powered surfaces, account prompts, and promotional nudges while basic desktop complaints sat unresolved. When a company moves quickly on its priorities and slowly on yours, you notice.
The Experimental channel gives Microsoft a place to test changes without promising immediate stable availability. That is sensible engineering. It also means users should be cautious about assuming any specific Start behavior will land unchanged in production. Build 26300.8553 is a preview, not a contract.
Still, previews shape expectations. Once users see that section-level Start toggles are possible, it becomes harder for Microsoft to justify withholding them. Once taskbar placement returns in testing, the old argument that Windows 11’s shell simply cannot support it becomes less persuasive. The Insider Program is where Microsoft can experiment, but it is also where users can see which limitations were technical and which were choices.
A launcher that looks customizable but opens slowly still feels broken. A Start menu that mixes native and web technologies can become a symbol of everything users dislike about modern Windows if it stutters, flashes, or waits on components that feel disconnected from the local machine. Responsiveness is not polish; it is the contract between input and trust.
Microsoft has said it is moving more experiences to WinUI 3 and working on responsiveness across core OS scenarios. The hard part is that users do not care which framework caused a delay. They care that pressing the Windows key should produce an immediate result every time, on clean installs and corporate images, on high-end desktops and aging laptops.
Search is part of this too. Microsoft says it wants more consistent search across Start, the taskbar, File Explorer, and Settings. That is the right goal, but Windows Search has long suffered from a split personality: local indexer, web search box, settings finder, app launcher, and Microsoft services funnel. Consistency will require more than making the boxes look alike.
The Start menu cannot be considered fixed until it is fast, predictable, and locally useful even when the network and cloud services are irrelevant. For many WindowsForum readers, that is the line between a shell improvement and another coat of paint.
Microsoft already provides ways for OEMs and organizations to customize Start layouts, but Windows 11’s evolving Start design has made this area feel more fluid than many admins would like. Every redesign raises questions: Will existing layout policies still apply? Can Recent be disabled without breaking useful recent-file behavior elsewhere? Will profile hiding be exposed through policy? Can All apps be hidden or forced? What happens across feature updates?
Those questions matter because Start is often one of the first things users blame when a migration feels wrong. A Windows 10-to-Windows 11 deployment can be technically successful and still generate complaints if users feel lost at the launcher. The more Microsoft changes Start, the more it needs crisp administrative controls and stable documentation.
The good news is that section-level design maps naturally to policy. If Microsoft exposes the same toggles to IT that it exposes to users, organizations can create simpler, role-specific experiences without resorting to brittle workarounds. A frontline device may not need Recent. A developer workstation may benefit from All apps. A classroom machine may need identity details hidden by default.
The bad news is that Microsoft’s consumer and enterprise instincts often collide in the shell. The company wants discovery surfaces. Admins want determinism. Start sits directly on that fault line.
This is where Microsoft differs from Apple and Google, whether it likes it or not. Windows runs everywhere, for everyone, in workflows Microsoft cannot anticipate. The same shell must serve gamers, accountants, teachers, developers, help desk technicians, accessibility users, kiosk builders, executives, students, and people who just want Solitaire and a browser. The design answer to that diversity cannot be “trust the default.”
Defaults still matter. Most users will never touch these settings, and Microsoft should make the out-of-box Start menu sensible. But the existence of deeper controls changes the relationship between the user and the OS. It says the machine can be adapted, not merely accepted.
That has always been part of Windows’ appeal. It is why people tolerate its inconsistencies, legacy corners, and occasional absurdities. Windows is at its best when it feels like a platform that can be shaped around the user rather than a product funnel that happens to run local apps.
But the direction is clear enough to judge. Microsoft is giving users more Start menu control, cleaning up the Recommended/Recent distinction, adding size preferences, and reducing identity exposure. Paired with taskbar placement and compact taskbar work, this is the most meaningful shell course correction Windows 11 has seen in some time.
The catch is that Microsoft still needs to finish the job. Preset sizes are useful, but true resizing would be better. Section toggles are useful, but policy support will decide enterprise value. Renaming Recommended is useful, but the section must stay user-centered rather than promotional. Performance promises are useful, but Start has to feel instant.
Microsoft Finally Treats Start as a Work Surface, Not a Poster
The Windows 11 Start menu has always looked more confident than it behaved. It floated above the centered taskbar, rounded and sparse, as if Microsoft had solved the hard problem of decades of Windows UI inheritance by hiding most of it behind a calmer face. But that confidence came at a price: users lost density, muscle memory, and several kinds of control they had taken for granted in Windows 10.The new Experimental-channel changes move in the opposite direction. Pinned, Recent, and All can now be managed as separate sections. The Start menu can be set to Automatic, Small, or Large. The account name and profile picture can be hidden for people who present, stream, screen-share, or simply dislike having their identity displayed in a launcher.
None of that sounds revolutionary because none of it should have needed a revolution. The scandal of Windows 11’s Start menu was never that it looked different. It was that Microsoft mistook a default layout for a universal workflow.
This is the distinction that matters for WindowsForum readers. A Start menu is not just a product surface; it is an operating habit. People build personal systems around where icons live, how many clicks it takes to reach a tool, and whether recent files are useful signals or unwanted noise. When Microsoft flattened those choices in 2021, it turned personal computing into a corporate taste test.
Windows 10X Still Haunts the Center of the Desktop
The story begins before Windows 11 shipped. The modern Start menu grew out of Windows 10X, Microsoft’s abandoned attempt to rethink Windows for a new generation of devices. Windows 10X was supposed to modernize the platform with a cleaner interface and a more contained app model, including stronger separation between traditional Win32 desktop software and the rest of the system.The containerization dream proved too difficult to deliver at the time, but the visual language survived. Windows 11 inherited the simplified launcher, the centered taskbar, and the mobile-influenced insistence that fewer visible controls meant a more modern PC. Microsoft carried over the showroom but not the architectural renovation that was supposed to justify it.
That explains why the first Windows 11 Start menu felt oddly underpowered. It was designed for a world in which Windows would behave less like old Windows, but it arrived on machines still running the full mess and glory of Win32, enterprise agents, legacy utilities, Store apps, web apps, and user-created shortcuts. The result was a launcher that looked like a tablet idea imposed on a desktop reality.
The initial October 2021 version of Windows 11 gave users Search, Pinned, and Recommended, but very little authority over how those pieces behaved. You could remove pinned icons and still be left with wasted space. You could dislike Recommended and still have to live around it. You could use Start every day and still feel as if the most personal part of Windows had become one of its least negotiable.
The Recommended Section Became a Trust Problem
Microsoft’s decision to rename Recommended to Recent is more than cosmetic. “Recommended” has always carried baggage in Windows because the word blurs the line between user convenience and vendor agenda. A recent file is yours. A recommended app, tip, or promotion may be Microsoft’s.That ambiguity is why the section became such a sore point. In theory, surfacing recent documents and newly installed apps is useful. In practice, Windows users have learned to be suspicious of any system area that can mix personal activity, suggestions, Store discovery, tips, and promotional nudges. The more Microsoft pushes services through Windows, the less patience users have for vague recommendation surfaces.
The new controls acknowledge that problem without fully saying it. Users can now individually toggle recently added apps, recent and suggested files, and tips or app recommendations. That matters because it separates different kinds of content that should never have been treated as one bucket.
A sysadmin may want users to see recently installed line-of-business tools but not tips. A writer may want recent files but not Store suggestions. A privacy-conscious user may want none of it. A developer may live entirely from Search and pinned tools. These are not edge cases; they are normal Windows use cases.
The renaming to Recent also narrows the promise. If Microsoft keeps the section focused on user activity, it has a chance to become useful rather than resented. If it becomes another soft landing zone for engagement experiments, the new label will not save it.
The New Toggles Are Small Because the Original Mistake Was Big
The most practical addition is section-level control. Pinned, Recent, and All can each be shown or hidden from Start settings, with the result that Start can become a minimal pinned-app launcher, a fuller all-apps surface, or something in between. This is the kind of option that reads as trivial until you remember how long Windows 11 users have been asking for exactly this kind of triviality.Windows power users are not asking Microsoft to abandon defaults. They are asking Microsoft to stop confusing defaults with destiny. A user who wants a clean Start menu with only pinned apps should not need registry edits, third-party shell replacements, or ritualistic unpinning to get there.
The same applies to the new size controls. Automatic sizing adapts to the display, while Small and Large let users force a preference where possible. This is especially relevant across multi-monitor setups and laptops that move between internal and external displays, where a Start menu that feels reasonable on one screen can feel absurd on another.
The limitation is obvious: these are presets, not true free resizing. Windows 10 let users resize Start more directly, and some longtime users will see Small and Large as a compromise rather than a restoration. They are right. But presets are still better than a launcher that behaves as if 13-inch laptops and 32-inch monitors are merely different viewing distances for the same design.
There is a philosophical difference between “the system adapts for you” and “the system lets you decide.” Windows 11 spent too much time on the former. This build begins to restore the latter.
Hiding the Account Profile Is a Privacy Feature Wearing a Cosmetic Hat
The option to hide the user name and profile picture in Start may seem minor, but it says something important about modern Windows. The PC is no longer only a private machine used at a desk. It is a presentation device, a streaming device, a remote-work terminal, a classroom screen, and a support-session endpoint.Displaying identity information in a place as frequently opened as Start creates unnecessary exposure. It may reveal a legal name during a screen share, show a profile photo in a recorded demo, or simply add visual clutter for users who do not need account switching from the launcher. The new option recognizes that privacy is often about reducing incidental disclosure, not just locking down telemetry.
The implementation, at least in early hands-on testing, appears imperfect. Hiding the name and picture can still leave the account button area functionally present, meaning the submenu may remain accessible even if the identity details disappear. That is typical Insider roughness, but it also reflects a broader Windows habit: Microsoft sometimes hides UI elements before fully rethinking why they exist.
Still, the direction is welcome. Account surfaces in Windows have increasingly become places where Microsoft can promote OneDrive, Microsoft accounts, backup prompts, subscriptions, and other service tie-ins. Giving users the ability to reduce that footprint in Start is a small but meaningful retreat from the idea that every OS surface should double as an account billboard.
The All Apps Integration Is the Change That Should Have Arrived First
The earlier Start redesign that integrated All apps into the main Start UI was arguably the more important usability shift. The original Windows 11 Start menu forced All apps into a separate view, adding a layer between the user and the installed software list. That was always strange for an operating system whose biggest advantage remains the breadth of software it can run.Bringing All apps inline, with Category, Grid, and List views, made Start feel more like a launcher again. It reduced the sense that Windows 11 was hiding the machine from its owner. The new Experimental controls build on that by allowing All to be shown or hidden alongside Pinned and Recent.
The category view is especially interesting because it reflects Microsoft’s ongoing desire to make app discovery less alphabetic and more semantic. That can help users who do not remember exact app names, but it also introduces the classic problem of automatic organization: the computer’s idea of a category may not match yours. A bad category system is worse than a dumb list because it gives the user a map they cannot edit.
That is why the List and Grid options matter. Microsoft can experiment with intelligence, but it must preserve predictable alternatives. Windows users tolerate novelty best when escape hatches are visible.
Taskbar Changes Make the Start Menu Shift Feel Less Isolated
The Start menu work is part of a larger correction around the Windows 11 shell. Microsoft is also testing the ability to move the taskbar to different screen edges, along with a smaller taskbar option. These features existed in earlier Windows versions in some form, disappeared in Windows 11, and are now returning as if rediscovered artifacts from a lost civilization.That cycle is frustrating, but it is also revealing. Windows 11 launched with a simplified shell that made sense from a design-deck perspective: fewer modes, fewer legacy options, fewer ways for users to create inconsistent layouts. But Windows is not iOS, and the desktop is not a controlled appliance. Its strength is that it absorbs different working styles.
For developers, vertical taskbars can reclaim precious vertical space. For ultrawide monitor users, side placement can be more efficient than a bottom bar. For laptop users, smaller taskbar buttons can mean more usable room for apps. These are not nostalgia requests. They are ergonomic ones.
The Start menu benefits from the same thinking. A smaller Start menu is not merely aesthetic. It changes how interruptive the launcher feels. A Start menu that can be stripped down to pins changes how quickly it can function as a command surface. A full Start menu with All apps visible changes how useful it is for browsing installed software.
Taken together, the taskbar and Start changes suggest Microsoft is relearning an old Windows lesson: customization is not clutter when it maps to real workflows.
The Insider Program Is Becoming Microsoft’s Public Apology Tour
The timing matters. Microsoft has spent 2026 talking more openly about Windows quality, pain points, performance, and Insider feedback. The company has reorganized parts of the Insider experience, introduced an Experimental channel for earlier feature work, and started publishing more explanation around why shell changes are happening.That transparency is useful, but it also functions as reputation repair. Windows 11 has not lacked features; it has lacked trust. Users have watched Microsoft add Copilot entry points, web-powered surfaces, account prompts, and promotional nudges while basic desktop complaints sat unresolved. When a company moves quickly on its priorities and slowly on yours, you notice.
The Experimental channel gives Microsoft a place to test changes without promising immediate stable availability. That is sensible engineering. It also means users should be cautious about assuming any specific Start behavior will land unchanged in production. Build 26300.8553 is a preview, not a contract.
Still, previews shape expectations. Once users see that section-level Start toggles are possible, it becomes harder for Microsoft to justify withholding them. Once taskbar placement returns in testing, the old argument that Windows 11’s shell simply cannot support it becomes less persuasive. The Insider Program is where Microsoft can experiment, but it is also where users can see which limitations were technical and which were choices.
Performance Is the Unfinished Half of the Promise
The current Start menu changes are mostly about layout and control. Microsoft has also talked about improving performance, latency, reliability, and consistency across core shell experiences, including Start and Search. That work may prove more important than the visible toggles.A launcher that looks customizable but opens slowly still feels broken. A Start menu that mixes native and web technologies can become a symbol of everything users dislike about modern Windows if it stutters, flashes, or waits on components that feel disconnected from the local machine. Responsiveness is not polish; it is the contract between input and trust.
Microsoft has said it is moving more experiences to WinUI 3 and working on responsiveness across core OS scenarios. The hard part is that users do not care which framework caused a delay. They care that pressing the Windows key should produce an immediate result every time, on clean installs and corporate images, on high-end desktops and aging laptops.
Search is part of this too. Microsoft says it wants more consistent search across Start, the taskbar, File Explorer, and Settings. That is the right goal, but Windows Search has long suffered from a split personality: local indexer, web search box, settings finder, app launcher, and Microsoft services funnel. Consistency will require more than making the boxes look alike.
The Start menu cannot be considered fixed until it is fast, predictable, and locally useful even when the network and cloud services are irrelevant. For many WindowsForum readers, that is the line between a shell improvement and another coat of paint.
Enterprise IT Will Like the Direction and Still Wait for Policy
For home users, the new Start controls are about preference. For enterprise IT, they are about manageability. The modern workplace includes shared screens, locked-down desktops, kiosk-like environments, hybrid identity, app catalogs, and carefully staged user experiences. A more flexible Start menu is helpful only if administrators can control it reliably.Microsoft already provides ways for OEMs and organizations to customize Start layouts, but Windows 11’s evolving Start design has made this area feel more fluid than many admins would like. Every redesign raises questions: Will existing layout policies still apply? Can Recent be disabled without breaking useful recent-file behavior elsewhere? Will profile hiding be exposed through policy? Can All apps be hidden or forced? What happens across feature updates?
Those questions matter because Start is often one of the first things users blame when a migration feels wrong. A Windows 10-to-Windows 11 deployment can be technically successful and still generate complaints if users feel lost at the launcher. The more Microsoft changes Start, the more it needs crisp administrative controls and stable documentation.
The good news is that section-level design maps naturally to policy. If Microsoft exposes the same toggles to IT that it exposes to users, organizations can create simpler, role-specific experiences without resorting to brittle workarounds. A frontline device may not need Recent. A developer workstation may benefit from All apps. A classroom machine may need identity details hidden by default.
The bad news is that Microsoft’s consumer and enterprise instincts often collide in the shell. The company wants discovery surfaces. Admins want determinism. Start sits directly on that fault line.
The Real Win Is Microsoft Admitting One Size Never Fit All
The most encouraging part of this update is not any single setting. It is the cumulative retreat from a rigid design posture. Windows 11 began with the idea that Start could be simplified into something broadly acceptable. The 2026 changes say, implicitly, that broadly acceptable is not good enough for the most-used surface in a desktop operating system.This is where Microsoft differs from Apple and Google, whether it likes it or not. Windows runs everywhere, for everyone, in workflows Microsoft cannot anticipate. The same shell must serve gamers, accountants, teachers, developers, help desk technicians, accessibility users, kiosk builders, executives, students, and people who just want Solitaire and a browser. The design answer to that diversity cannot be “trust the default.”
Defaults still matter. Most users will never touch these settings, and Microsoft should make the out-of-box Start menu sensible. But the existence of deeper controls changes the relationship between the user and the OS. It says the machine can be adapted, not merely accepted.
That has always been part of Windows’ appeal. It is why people tolerate its inconsistencies, legacy corners, and occasional absurdities. Windows is at its best when it feels like a platform that can be shaped around the user rather than a product funnel that happens to run local apps.
The New Start Menu Is a Beta Test of Microsoft’s Humility
For now, the practical advice is simple: treat this as promising Insider work, not a reason to reinstall your main PC. Build 26300.8553 is in the Experimental channel, and Experimental means exactly what it says. Features can be incomplete, unstable, renamed, delayed, or changed before they reach the stable branch.But the direction is clear enough to judge. Microsoft is giving users more Start menu control, cleaning up the Recommended/Recent distinction, adding size preferences, and reducing identity exposure. Paired with taskbar placement and compact taskbar work, this is the most meaningful shell course correction Windows 11 has seen in some time.
The catch is that Microsoft still needs to finish the job. Preset sizes are useful, but true resizing would be better. Section toggles are useful, but policy support will decide enterprise value. Renaming Recommended is useful, but the section must stay user-centered rather than promotional. Performance promises are useful, but Start has to feel instant.
The Settings That Actually Change the Daily Desktop
This build is worth paying attention to because its small controls land exactly where Windows users feel friction every day. The Start menu is not a once-a-month settings panel; it is a repeated gesture, and repeated gestures magnify annoyance.- Users can now shape Start around Pinned, Recent, and All instead of accepting Microsoft’s preferred mix of sections.
- The Recommended area’s shift toward Recent only earns trust if Microsoft keeps promotional content clearly separated from user activity.
- Small, Large, and Automatic sizing are welcome, but they do not fully replace the freeform resizing many users remember from Windows 10.
- Hiding the account name and profile picture is a practical privacy improvement for screen sharing, streaming, classrooms, and shared workspaces.
- The Start changes matter more because they arrive alongside taskbar positioning and compact taskbar work, signaling a broader retreat from Windows 11’s original rigidity.
- IT administrators should watch for matching policy controls before treating these features as deployment-ready improvements.
References
- Primary source: thurrott.com
Published: 2026-06-01T14:43:39.920755
Loading…
www.thurrott.com - Related coverage: notebookcheck.net
Windows 11 Insider Build 26300.8553 finally lets you customize the Start menu
Windows 11 Insider Preview Build 26300.8553 brings a modular Start menu with Small, Large, and Automatic size presets and new privacy tools to the Experimental channel.
www.notebookcheck.net
- Related coverage: windowslatest.com
Microsoft is making Windows 11's Start menu resizable after years of complaints, adds Small and Large options
Microsoft says it's finally killing Windows 11's one-size-fits-all Start menu, adding resize options after years of complaints.
www.windowslatest.com
- Related coverage: techradar.com
Loading…
www.techradar.com - Related coverage: dataconomy.com
Windows 11 update adds major Start menu customization options
Microsoft is testing updates for Windows 11 that will enhance customization options for the Start menu and taskbar, with rollouts
dataconomy.com
- Official source: learn.microsoft.com
Loading…
learn.microsoft.com
- Related coverage: pureinfotech.com
Windows 11 is finally fixing the Start menu with long‑overdue resizing options
Windows 11 will soon let users resize the Start menu, hide sections, and separate recommendations from recent files.
pureinfotech.com
- Related coverage: windowscentral.com
“A cleaner, more useful Start menu” — Windows 11 is getting 4 upgrades soon
Microsoft is finally fixing some of the biggest frustrations with the Windows 11 Start menu, including resizing and better customization controls.
www.windowscentral.com
- Related coverage: tomsguide.com
Loading…
www.tomsguide.com - Related coverage: pcgamer.com
Microsoft announces plans to let you put the taskbar in Windows 11 pretty much anywhere you want
Top, bottom, left and right.www.pcgamer.com
- Related coverage: scscc.club
Loading…
www.scscc.club - Official source: blogs.windows.com
Improving Windows quality: Making Taskbar and Start more personal
In our commitment to Windows quality, we outlined our plans to deliver improvements in performance, reliability, and craft. We are also committed to
blogs.windows.com