Windows Server 2025 v2506 Baseline: Leaner Settings and Enhanced Logging

Microsoft’s June 2025 revision to the Windows Server 2025 security baseline (v2506) tightens detection and simplifies legacy settings while signaling a shift to more frequent, incremental baseline updates—changes that matter to every Windows datacenter and hybrid cloud operator.

Background​

The Windows Server 2025 security baseline is Microsoft’s prescriptive configuration package that codifies recommended Group Policy and system settings for server roles such as Domain Controllers (DC) and Member Servers (MS). Designed to reduce configuration drift, harden defaults, and provide a repeatable deployment path, these baselines are distributed through the Microsoft Security Compliance Toolkit and are increasingly consumable via OSConfig, Windows Admin Center, and Azure Policy for Azure Arc–connected servers.
The v2506 release, published in June 2025, is the first significant revision since the baseline’s January 2025 initial package. It contains a focused set of changes that do three things: remove obsolete client-only or deprecated settings, enable higher-fidelity auditing and telemetry where it helps defenders, and adjust access restrictions to better balance security and operational resilience. Microsoft states it will now publish baseline updates more frequently to keep pace with evolving threats, new Windows features, and community feedback.

What changed in v2506 — the short list​

• Deny log on through Remote Desktop Services: Adjusted SIDs to permit non-admin local accounts on Member Servers while continuing to deny high-risk local admin accounts, and explicitly added BUILTIN\Guests to both DC and MS deny lists.
• WDigest Authentication: Removed from the baseline because the OS no longer requires explicit enforcement—WDigest has been deprecated in modern server releases.
• Allow Windows Ink Workspace: Removed; this is a client-only setting and not applicable to server SKUs.
• Audit: Authorization Policy Change: Set to Success for both DC and MS roles to capture successful changes to user rights and audit policy.
• Audit: Include command line in process creation events: Enabled to capture command-line arguments in process creation logs.
• Microsoft Defender Antivirus — Control whether exclusions are visible to local users: Set to Not Configured because the parent policy already governs the behavior.

These are targeted, surgical edits rather than a wholesale baseline overhaul. That design reflects the push toward more frequent, lighter-weight updates that keep the baseline aligned with the product’s current defaults and defender needs.

---

Why these changes matter​

1) Improved detection through command-line visibility​

Enabling Include command line in process creation events is the headline security improvement in v2506. Capturing command-line arguments dramatically improves the ability of security teams to distinguish benign activity from malicious use of native tools (living-off-the-land binaries), script execution, or obfuscated multi-stage payloads.

• Benefit: Better context for EDR and SIEM correlation—investigators can triage alerts faster and write more precise hunting rules.
• Practical impact: More actionable telemetry for defenders without requiring new agents or product installs.

Caveats: administrators must account for additional log volume (particularly on high-churn servers), evaluate SIEM ingestion costs, and review privacy/compliance concerns around command-line content (which can contain PII, secrets, or credentials in legacy scripts). Plan to filter or scrub sensitive fields if compliance requires it.

2) Removing legacy settings reduces confusion and GPO clutter​

WDigest, an authentication layer dating back many years, was removed because modern Windows Server builds no longer rely on explicit baseline enforcement to neutralize it. Likewise, Allow Windows Ink Workspace was removed because it’s a client-only control that only added noise for server administrators.

• Benefit: Leaner GPOs, shorter GPO processing times, and fewer “red herrings” when auditing applied settings.
• Practical impact: Fewer misplaced settings in the central store and fewer false alarms during GPO reviews.

Caveats: Organizations that have bespoke, legacy environments or that run older OS builds in parallel should validate whether any domain-level objects—or older ADMX packages—still reference the removed settings.

3) Rethinking RDP denial semantics for operational flexibility​

Changing the Deny log on through Remote Desktop Services mapping to use S-1-5-114 (local accounts that are members of Administrators) instead of S-1-5-113 (all local accounts) permits non-admin local accounts on Member Servers to log on interactively while continuing to block admin-local accounts that represent the primary RDP risk vector.

• Benefit: Preserves a secure fallback for maintenance scenarios (e.g., local accounts for remote troubleshooting during domain outages) without reopening admin account exposure.
• Practical impact: Reduced operational friction for recovery and failover workflows that rely on local non-admin accounts.

Caveats: This change requires teams to evaluate existing operational runbooks and ensure local non-admin accounts are secured, rotated, and audited appropriately. It’s a policy trade-off: convenience for safe recovery versus a small increase in the attack surface that must be managed.

4) Increased auditing for low-volume, high-value events​

Setting Audit Authorization Policy Change to Success gives defenders visibility into rare but impactful configuration changes—user-right assignments, audit policy edits, and similar high-value events.

• Benefit: Low log volume but high forensic value—these events often precede or accompany privilege escalation and lateral movement.
• Practical impact: Earlier detection of policy tampering or mistaken configuration changes.

Caveats: Organizations with limited monitoring capability should avoid enabling failure auditing recklessly; it can generate noise and distract responders if not paired with tuned alerting.

5) UEFI lock and virtualization-based protections remain emphasized​

While v2506 doesn’t change recommended values for virtualization-based security (VBS) or LSASS PPL, Microsoft highlights the role of UEFI lock and firmware protections in making these features tamper-resistant. This is a reminder that software settings are most effective when combined with hardware-rooted protections like Secure Boot, TPM, and UEFI variable locking.

• Benefit: When supported, UEFI lock hardens systems against post-deployment tampering.
• Practical impact: For high-assurance deployments, enabling UEFI lock raises the bar for attackers.

Caveats: UEFI lock can be difficult or impossible to reverse, and hardware/firmware compatibility issues remain a real operational risk. Test on representative hardware and have a recovery plan.

---

Operational considerations and compatibility risks​

Every baseline change that increases telemetry, tightens rights, or locks platform features brings operational consequences. Below are the most important items ops and security teams must evaluate before deployment.

• Log volume and SIEM costs: Command-line capture increases event payload size. On busy servers this can create significant ingestion volume. Triage using sampling, route logs through local filtering, or adjust SIEM retention to control cost.
• Privacy and data protection: Command lines may contain personal data or infrastructure secrets. Review data classification rules and implement redaction or controlled access to logs where necessary.
• App compatibility: Some legacy applications or management scripts may break if they rely on prior default behaviors. Test application startups and scheduled tasks in a lab ring before baseline enforcement in production.
• ADMX/ADML central store issues: Community reports show some administrators encountered missing ADMX/ADML templates after importing the v2506 baseline. Always validate that the Templates folder is complete and that you’ve deployed the matching ADMX/ADML files to SYSVOL before wide GPO application.
• Firmware and hardware variance: UEFI lock and VBS-related settings require platform support. Older servers or OEM firmware bugs can cause failures when UEFI lock is enforced.
• Rollback complexity: Some protections—particularly UEFI lock—are effectively irreversible. Ensure you have image-level backups and tested recovery procedures before enabling such settings.

---

Recommended deployment roadmap (step-by-step)​

• Inventory and planning
• Identify the Windows Server 2025 machines by role (DC, Member Server, Workgroup).
• Catalog business-critical apps and management tools that use RDP, local accounts, or custom process invocation.
• Download the baseline package
• Obtain v2506 from the official distribution channel (Security Compliance Toolkit). Treat the zip as authoritative and extract the GPO backups and documentation.
• Review the New Settings spreadsheet
• Open the included documentation (e.g., “New Settings in Windows Server 2025 v2506.xlsx”) to see exact registry keys, ADMX templates, and affected roles.
• Prepare the ADMX central store
• Ensure the Templates folder (ADMX/ADML) is complete in SYSVOL. If the baseline contains new ADMX files, import them carefully and back up existing ADMX files first.
• Lab test
• Apply the baseline to non-production test VMs that mirror the role and workload. Pay special attention to:
• RDP connectivity for local recovery accounts
• Application startups and scheduled tasks
• EDR behavior and SIEM ingestion
• Firmware interactions for UEFI lock and VBS
• Telemetry and logging plan
• Confirm SIEM can receive and correlate the increased process creation events. Define retention, access controls, and PII redaction policy for command-line data.
• Staged rollout
• Use a canary ring (small set of non-critical servers), followed by mid-tier systems, and finally broad rollout to production when confidence is high.
• For Azure Arc–connected servers, use OSConfig/Azure Policy to pilot and report compliance metrics.
• Monitoring and incident readiness
• Monitor audit logs for unexpected spikes post-deployment. Validate that Audit Authorization Policy Change events are being generated and are actionable.
• Ensure patching cadence and hotpatch options are compatible with the baseline settings you’ve applied.
• Document and communicate
• Update runbooks, admin SOPs, and support tickets templates so NOC and application teams understand the new baseline’s operational implications.
• Revisit and iterate
• Treat baselines as living artifacts. Plan quarterly reviews and apply incremental Microsoft updates as released.

---

Technical verification and accuracy checks​

Administrators should confirm a few concrete technical details before relying on assumptions:

• The v2506 revision was published in June 2025 and is identified as version 4.0 of the Windows Server 2025 baseline. This is an official product revision targeted at keeping the baseline current between larger refresh cycles.
• The baseline references platform-level improvements (e.g., WDigest deprecation) that stem from earlier Windows Server updates and platform engineering changes; confirm that all servers you manage are running an OS build consistent with these assumptions.
• Microsoft recommends OSConfig, Windows Admin Center, and Azure Policy as supported management paths to apply and manage baselines in large or hybrid environments; teams should choose the path that best fits their environment.
• Baseline packages include GPO backups, ADMX templates, Excel documentation, and scripts to deploy to a central store—always extract and inspect the provided documentation to understand registry keys, ADMX mappings, and exceptions.

If any claim in the baseline appears to contradict your environment (for example, missing ADMX files or unexpected registry keys), treat that as a red flag: validate the package contents, confirm ADMX compatibility, and open a support channel for clarification before applying changes widely.

---

Strengths of Microsoft’s new baseline approach​

• Agility: Moving to more frequent, smaller baseline updates helps security teams react faster to emerging threats and product changes. This reduces the window between a new product default and a recommended baseline adjustment.
• Detections-first mindset: Enabling command-line capture and targeted audit events increases defender visibility—an essential capability given modern adversary tactics.
• Cleaner recommendations: Removing client-only and deprecated settings reduces administrative noise and produces leaner GPOs.
• Integration with cloud management: Native support for OSConfig and Azure Policy helps enterprises enforce baselines consistently across on-prem, co-located, and cloud-attached servers.

---

Risks and open questions​

• Ingestion and cost pressure on logging platforms: The most immediate operational risk is the spike in telemetry volume and the downstream cost and architectural changes required in SIEM/EDR pipelines.
• Privacy and compliance exposure: Without redaction or controlled access, command-line logs risk storing sensitive data, undermining privacy and compliance requirements.
• Firmware and hardware incompatibilities: UEFI lock and VBS enhancements are powerful, but their irreversible or semi-permanent nature on some platforms raises concerns for long-lived server hardware or regulated environments.
• Incomplete ADMX/ADML packaging: Community reports of missing ADMX/ADML files after baseline import indicate packaging or import quirks—organizations should validate the templates after import.
• Change management fatigue: More frequent baseline updates demand improved change-control processes. Organizations with long release cycles and cautious change windows may struggle to keep pace without automating validation and rollback.

---

Practical hardening checklist for v2506​

• Audit server builds and cluster OS versions; ensure compatibility with WDigest deprecation assumptions.
• Run a focused test plan for command-line capture on a subset of servers, and measure event size and filter needs.
• Add an access control policy for logs that contain command-line arguments; restrict read access to SOC personnel.
• Validate ADMX deployment in SYSVOL and run a GPO modeling simulation before applying to production OUs.
• Create a UEFI lock test matrix: hardware vendor, firmware revision, and recovery steps; do not enable UEFI lock across fleets without vendor-confirmed support.
• Use Azure Policy/OSConfig for Arc-managed servers to enforce and report compliance; leverage Microsoft-provided baselines to maintain parity across hybrid assets.
• Maintain a baseline change register that maps baseline changes to impacted applications and operational steps for remediation and rollback.

---

The broader security posture: what this signals for Windows Server admins​

v2506 is less about dramatic new controls and more about operationalizing detection and removing legacy friction. By emphasizing command-line capture, increasing audit visibility, and pruning irrelevant settings, Microsoft is steering server hardening toward defender enablement rather than strict lockstep enforcement.
That matters because modern defense depends less on a single set of prohibitions and more on rapid detection, correlated telemetry, and resilient operational workflows. The baseline’s evolution reflects an understanding that administrators need both strong defaults and flexible, testable mechanisms to respond to incidents and maintain business continuity.
However, the shift to more frequent updates raises the bar for internal change-control processes. Security and IT teams must accelerate validation, testing, and telemetry planning, or their SIEM and operations teams will be overwhelmed by the noise and cost of new telemetry. In short: the baseline makes it easier to detect threats, but organizations must be ready to absorb and act on the increased visibility.

---

Conclusion​

The Windows Server 2025 v2506 security baseline is a pragmatic, defender‑focused update: it removes legacy clutter, enhances auditing and visibility where it yields real detection value, and introduces a more agile cadence for baseline revisions. For operators, the immediate priorities are testing command-line audit impacts, verifying ADMX/template deployments, and ensuring hardware/firmware compatibility for platform protections like UEFI lock.
Adopt v2506 as an opportunity to modernize not just group policies, but the telemetry and change-control practices that turn raw logs into actionable security. With a careful, staged rollout and attention to SIEM, privacy, and hardware constraints, organizations can gain significant detection improvements with manageable operational disruption.

---

Source: Neowin Microsoft updates security baseline package for Windows Server 2025