i honestly believe Microsoft could have done better by allowing most devices at least 10yrs and below to support the new OS and subsequently encourage users to buy new devices. coming from a time where most of the world is recovering from the pandemic its sad that we somehow have to factor an additional cost to experience the new OS given the new hardware requirements, anyway in future its not always about supporting a product for a long time and launching new products with huge demands and expectations, but ensuring that users can be loyal to your product and upgrade without being coerced. #MyThoughts/Opinions
📎 AI Summary:
The thread discusses frustrations with Microsoft's hardware and security requirements for Windows 11, particularly the TPM 2.0 mandate, which many users feel pressures them into upgrading or replacing their devices. Several contributors express skepticism about Microsoft's control over hardware and software, with some arguing that security measures are partly motivated by profit and device control. Overall, users voice dissatisfaction with Microsoft's approach, but acknowledge that they may have limited options until Windows 10's end of support in 2025.
The thread discusses frustrations with Microsoft's hardware and security requirements for Windows 11, particularly the TPM 2.0 mandate, which many users feel pressures them into upgrading or replacing their devices. Several contributors express skepticism about Microsoft's control over hardware and software, with some arguing that security measures are partly motivated by profit and device control. Overall, users voice dissatisfaction with Microsoft's approach, but acknowledge that they may have limited options until Windows 10's end of support in 2025.