You know macs do the same thing in OSX when you hit the close button so we know who microsoft is taking lessons from now.I actually didn't know that. I only played with it quickly and didn't realize how it actually works. So, I am pulling my positive feedback back. MS still sucks. If "x" does not close the app, then they should have used "-" for minimize.
The last update actually corrupted a lot of pre-installed apps including the WinStore itself.
What a way to SUCK Microsoft!
This is part of the reason why I use linux, sure its not a pertfect solution to this kind of thing but linux can be made your system instead of something cooked by a big companyMS should be working on optimizing memory usage rather cheating and doing the easiest workaround to make app load times feel faster. How hard is it for them to add another button beside the "X" button that suspends the app instead of closing it completely? The thing about Microsoft approach, they push everything down your throat instead of asking the users what they want.
But MS IS optimizing memory usage. If you open another program that needs the memory reserved by any suspended app, then that memory will be released for use by the system.MS should be working on optimizing memory usage rather cheating and doing the easiest workaround to make app load times feel faster. How hard is it for them to add another button beside the "X" button that suspends the app instead of closing it completely? The thing about Microsoft approach, they push everything down your throat instead of asking the users what they want.