Ralph Bromley
Fantastic Member
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2012
- Messages
- 577
At its peak Windows XP had at least 95% of the operating system market cornered. This is before the existence of tablets and modern processors. There is really no comparison, other than to look backwards. The only two real alternatives, during this time frame, were Windows 2000 (arguably the XP predecessor), and Windows 98 SE. Windows ME was the big flop that focused businesses and retail customers to Windows 2000. As far as it being a piece of crap, or whatever. Sure, it may look that way now. It is a dated operating system from 2001. Because most of the world had Windows XP, it was targeted the most. Red Hat and Slackware Linux servers were also targeted extensively. Internet Explorer was adapted to corner the Internet marketplace from the client end, and not the server. This was a miscalculation, as far as my opinion goes. Microsoft did not impose rigorous security safeguards into its quality assurance and update process until several major worms hit the Internet including Code Red and the Blaster worm. There is a correlation here as far as the commercialization of the Internet happened throughout the 90s and 00's, and the evolution of viri and malware. The more commercialized the Internet gets, the more there is to gain for criminals to bypass its safeguards.So consider this to be a bit of self indulgence as I give my own eulogy at windows XP's funeral.
Windows XP was my first full time operating system, and as it ends its support cycle its time for me to do some fun looking back on one of the computing worlds biggest successes and how it all went so terribly wrong.
Now how can one of the biggest successes in the computing world be in itself a failure?
Well lets take a look at what Windows XP offered.
Firstly XP was the first OS to become popular overall to the masses , sure Microsoft had successes with 95 and 98 but XP was the first true mainstream system that brought many to the wonders of the home computer.
This is no small feat, Microsoft's PR engine was on all four cylinders with XP by creating a system that was super user friendly with a no frills approach to computing.
Simplicity is a nice goal to have when making an OS, there are very good reasons why XP, OSX, Ubuntu, iOS and android has caught on with most of the computing world.
All offer simplicity for better or for worse depending on your perspective.
Lets take the better reasons why something like XP caught on:
Firstly the OS is extremely accessible from the total newcomer to the most pro computer user, the average Joe user like myself has benefited from the skills I have learned from XP.
Indeed XP taught me a lot about how an OS worked and functioned, how everything connected and how it all came to work.
I actually owe a lot to XP, it is the OS that got me really into learning about computers and how they worked.
Without it I would not be wanting to get a diploma for computing or even built the desktop I am posting this all from.
But even so the holes in the armor of XP and the other Microsoft operating systems can be seen from outer space.
How Microsoft integrated the whole kernel and the components of the OS into one big ball of insecurities, where if one pin was taken out the whole ship would sink.
Its like the Titanic of operating systems, Microsoft claimed it was unsinkable and the boat kept on taking on water.
Security holes were abound with XP, its “easy for everyone” approach was letting hackers become kids in a candy store.
And tying Internet explorer to the core of the OS was no help, one of the most dumb things Microsoft has ever done and XP suffered greatly for it.
But most learned to adapt to XP's shortcomings and soon Microsoft became complacent and frankly rather arrogant.
Overconfident they blundered into windows Vista without any consideration to users of XP nor the computing world in general.
Vista is the main reason why XP's lifespan was extended, it was a miserable release for many so Microsoft had to create windows 7 to bring back its consumer ratio.
And now they made the same blunder once again with 8.
Microsoft is a company full of blundering in when new challenges arise, first with apple now with android.
This is something that Microsoft is good at, being rich but very little brain matter when it comes to actually producing a good OS half the time.
And XP is the source of the blame for this mentality, so cocky was Microsoft that blundering stupidity was abound.
As the new computing age began Microsoft just seems to slip and makes you wonder how in the hell did it get so big sometimes.
Even from a pro Microsoft standpoint the blunders can be seen without the need of a telescope five million miles long.
Nevertheless XP was a semi decent OS once you plugged all its holes and built a bomb shelter around it.
C'est la vie Windows XP, and bon voyage.
XP was probably the most successful OS ever. From now on there will be more diversification to tablets, chromebooks, phones with different operating systems than Windows. And Linux also seems to get more attention - if they only could get their act together and focus on 2 or 3 main distros.
I never liked XP and I hardly used it. But that may have been only me. There nust have been something to it if so many people used it for such a long time - and are still hanging on to it.
Wecome Annie, by all means use Xp if it floots your boat but please don't do any i-banking, paypay, ebay, amazion etc with it.I'd rather stick with an OS that does everything I want
Well I sure hope that you don't plan on using this forever as XP should be buried it's no longer supported its insecure and has no reason to be on anyone's computer I don't care how good the system is for you you're endangering yourself you might as well light yourself on fire while diving into a barrel of oil next to A bunch of propane tanks located next to a dynamite factory located right next to the nuclear reactor that is on the side of a active volcanoI still use XP. If a program, such as IE, can't run on XP, I deep-six that program. I'd rather stick with an OS that does everything I want and use older programs that also do everything I want. Most "upgrades" seem to be designed to run on small devices with limited storage and processing power; I have a PC with plenty of both and I want an OS and programs designed to use them. I don't care about fancy icons & pretty screens; I care about how it works, and every time I've tried something else, I've gone back to XP. Write tablet programs for the people who want to play games and computer programs for those of us who want to work.