Windows 7 any replacement for the file explorer of 7?

JekylHyde

New Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2010
Messages
6
i really don't like it.
it can't even copy files right.
i wanted to copy a 300mb folder & after 20minutes i checked it & the destenation was 5Gb! :confused:

i tried freecommander & classic shell but they are just a graphical thing. they still use the original Windows 7 file explorer (the original copy window appears).
 

Solution
Classic Shell, does change the way that Windows Explorer works in some ways, I found that it improved usage of Windows Explorer to the extent that the folders don't jump up and down the screen when you open them.

As to why your why your destination folder was larger then the one you copied... When you finished was the content of the folder, the same as the original folder or did something else get copied into it?
If the content appears to be the same, look at the individual files and see if any of the files got bigger.

CommonTater

New Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2010
Messages
867
It might help if you tell us what you were copying, from where and where to...

I've seen Win7 become painfully slow on USB drives, but network and DD-HD copies have always been fast.
 

MikeHawthorne

Essential Member
Microsoft Community Contributor
Joined
May 25, 2009
Messages
6,671
Classic Shell, does change the way that Windows Explorer works in some ways, I found that it improved usage of Windows Explorer to the extent that the folders don't jump up and down the screen when you open them.

As to why your why your destination folder was larger then the one you copied... When you finished was the content of the folder, the same as the original folder or did something else get copied into it?
If the content appears to be the same, look at the individual files and see if any of the files got bigger.
 

Solution
Back
Top