Gen Z is not rejecting generative AI, but it is becoming markedly less convinced that the tools are good for its own thinking. Gallup’s latest Voices of Gen Z survey found that weekly-or-daily AI use held steady at 51%, even as the share of respondents who said AI made them feel excited fell 14 points year over year to 22%.
The important part for employers is not the mood swing. It is the gap between use and trust. Gallup surveyed 1,572 Americans aged 14 to 29 from February 24 to March 4, 2026, and found that 42% believe AI will harm their ability to think carefully about information. Thirty-eight percent said it would hurt their ability to generate original ideas. Eight in 10 said it was at least somewhat likely that tools designed to complete tasks faster would make learning harder later.
That is a more useful framing than the usual “digital natives welcome AI” shorthand. Young workers may be fluent with chatbots and copilots, but many appear to understand the trade-off: faster first drafts and quicker answers can also remove the repetition, error correction and independent problem-solving that build professional judgment.
Gallup found employed Gen Z respondents were far more likely to say AI’s workplace risks outweighed its benefits, 48% versus 15%. They also trusted work done without AI much more than AI-assisted work, by 69% to 28%.
Yet abstaining is rarely a realistic career option. A Wharton-led study with Gallup and the Walton Family Foundation, as reported by Fortune, found 74% of Gen Z respondents had used an AI tool such as a chatbot in the previous month. The survey captured the obvious incentive: workers may worry that AI makes colleagues less capable, while also viewing their own AI fluency as a route to promotion.
GoTo and Workplace Intelligence put numbers around the dependence concern in their 2026 Pulse of Work survey of 2,500 global employees and IT leaders. Sixty-two percent of Gen Z workers said they treated AI as a crutch, and 40% said they could not function without it. Those are self-reported attitudes, not proof that AI has reduced anyone’s skills, but they should concern managers building junior talent pipelines.
For Windows-centric organizations rolling out Microsoft 365 Copilot, GitHub Copilot or approved internal assistants, the practical approach is less dramatic:
The important part for employers is not the mood swing. It is the gap between use and trust. Gallup surveyed 1,572 Americans aged 14 to 29 from February 24 to March 4, 2026, and found that 42% believe AI will harm their ability to think carefully about information. Thirty-eight percent said it would hurt their ability to generate original ideas. Eight in 10 said it was at least somewhat likely that tools designed to complete tasks faster would make learning harder later.
That is a more useful framing than the usual “digital natives welcome AI” shorthand. Young workers may be fluent with chatbots and copilots, but many appear to understand the trade-off: faster first drafts and quicker answers can also remove the repetition, error correction and independent problem-solving that build professional judgment.
The workplace contradiction
Gallup found employed Gen Z respondents were far more likely to say AI’s workplace risks outweighed its benefits, 48% versus 15%. They also trusted work done without AI much more than AI-assisted work, by 69% to 28%.Yet abstaining is rarely a realistic career option. A Wharton-led study with Gallup and the Walton Family Foundation, as reported by Fortune, found 74% of Gen Z respondents had used an AI tool such as a chatbot in the previous month. The survey captured the obvious incentive: workers may worry that AI makes colleagues less capable, while also viewing their own AI fluency as a route to promotion.
GoTo and Workplace Intelligence put numbers around the dependence concern in their 2026 Pulse of Work survey of 2,500 global employees and IT leaders. Sixty-two percent of Gen Z workers said they treated AI as a crutch, and 40% said they could not function without it. Those are self-reported attitudes, not proof that AI has reduced anyone’s skills, but they should concern managers building junior talent pipelines.
What IT and HR should do
The predictable response—ban public AI tools—will mostly drive use out of sight. GoTo’s survey also found that 56% of IT leaders said their companies had no AI policy, while 84% of employees said their employer was not doing enough to promote responsible use. That is an invitation to shadow AI, not a governance strategy.For Windows-centric organizations rolling out Microsoft 365 Copilot, GitHub Copilot or approved internal assistants, the practical approach is less dramatic:
- Set clear rules for approved tools, sensitive data and human review.
- Train staff to verify outputs, cite sources internally and recognize when a task requires independent analysis.
- Preserve unassisted practice in onboarding, incident response, coding reviews and analytical work.
- Measure quality and judgment, not merely throughput or prompt volume.
References
- Primary source: cxotoday.com
Published: 2026-07-13T05:18:23+00:00
The AI paradox: Why Gen Z fears smarter tools diminish their skills
By Achal Khanna Something odd is happening with the generation that adopted AI fastest. They are also the generation most convinced it might be hollowing them out. Gallup ran its latest Voices of Gen Z survey earlier this year, talking to more than 1,500 young people. Excitement...cxotoday.com - Related coverage: techradar.com
It's not just you — nearly two-thirds of workers say they've exaggerated AI skills to get ahead at their company | TechRadar
Two-thirds of workers exaggerate AI skills – job loss fears are highwww.techradar.com
