jimbo45

New Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2009
Messages
1,208
Note to Microsoft Developers

Why on Earth do you have to make such a dogs dinner of essentially a decent application.

I'm talking about the Windows Media Center.

Most TV tuner cards sold these days have a Composite Video input as well as Antenna / cable input.
However when you set up the Media Center for your device you can only choose Antenna OR set top box.

This means that you can EITHER play TV on it OR take input from your aux. input (set top box, video sender, camcorder etc etc). Once you've set it up then you can't add the secondary source ---- what a dogs dinner -- lots of people have camcorders etc etc they would like to use without having to re-set the entire media center each time.

Also you can't even set up the composite input unless you have a remote -- again what a dogs dinner -- if I'm playing a camcorder on a laptop why do I want to mess around with a remote -- and in any case the chances are the remote won't be recognized by the computer anyway.

Surely it would be simple on the interface when starting the program to prompt for source Antenna or Composite.

C'mon Microsoft -- do you actually get "Real Users" to test this stuff -- anybody would have pointed this defect out in 5 mins.

If you are hoping to Integrate Browsing, Multi-media, etc etc you had better get "your thinking hats on again".
I like the idea of the TV program guides per region etc which makes the Media Center theoretically better than the 3rd party application software -- but why hobble what must be an easy feature to include.

Woof Woof -- as I said what a dogs dinner.

Cheers
jimbo
 


Solution
Jimbo raises some valid concerns about the limitations and functionality of Windows Media Center, particularly regarding the handling of multiple inputs and the setup process. Let's address each point raised:

Limitations of Windows Media Center:​

  1. Limited Input Selection:
    • Windows Media Center restricts users to choose either Antenna or Set-Top Box during setup, preventing the simultaneous use of multiple input sources like a Composite Video input. This limitation can be frustrating for users who wish to switch between different sources without reconfiguring the setup.
    []Inconvenience of Adding Secondary Sources:
    • Once the setup is complete, adding a secondary source, such as a camcorder or...
Jimbo raises some valid concerns about the limitations and functionality of Windows Media Center, particularly regarding the handling of multiple inputs and the setup process. Let's address each point raised:

Limitations of Windows Media Center:​

  1. Limited Input Selection:
    • Windows Media Center restricts users to choose either Antenna or Set-Top Box during setup, preventing the simultaneous use of multiple input sources like a Composite Video input. This limitation can be frustrating for users who wish to switch between different sources without reconfiguring the setup.
    []Inconvenience of Adding Secondary Sources:
    • Once the setup is complete, adding a secondary source, such as a camcorder or video sender, becomes cumbersome as there is no straightforward way to include additional input sources without reconfiguring the entire Media Center. This restriction hampers the user experience and convenience.
    [
    ]Dependency on Remote for Composite Input Setup:
    • Setting up a Composite Video input is tied to the need for a remote control, which can be impractical for users wanting to use a source like a camcorder on a laptop. This dependency on a remote control can be unnecessary and inconvenient for certain scenarios.

      Suggestions for Improvement:​

    • Flexible Input Selection:
    • Microsoft can enhance the Media Center interface by providing an option during setup to select and switch between different input sources like Antenna or Composite Video. This simple addition would offer users more flexibility in using multiple input devices without the need for constant reconfiguration.
    • Simplified Input Configuration:
    • Streamlining the process of adding secondary sources without the requirement of a remote control can improve usability. Allowing users to configure additional input sources easily through the software interface would eliminate unnecessary complexities.
    • User Testing and Feedback:
    • Conducting comprehensive user testing with a diverse group of users, including "Real Users" as Jimbo mentioned, can help Microsoft identify and address such usability issues promptly. Gathering feedback from real users can provide valuable insights into the user experience and help in refining the features of Windows Media Center.

      Conclusion:​

      While Windows Media Center offers promising features like TV program guides, there is room for improvement in terms of input source selection, setup convenience, and user feedback integration. By prioritizing user experience and addressing the limitations highlighted by users like Jimbo, Microsoft can enhance the functionality and usability of Windows Media Center for a more seamless and user-friendly multimedia experience.
 


Solution
Back
Top