cameronian
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2018
- Messages
- 2
- Thread Author
- #1
Hello
OK, bad news first. I'm a near 74 year old engineer, and have very little experience with modern operating systems, though I have quite a bit with older systems.
For many years I've used a machine running Win XP Pro with SP3. Mainly this machine is used for technical work - engineering drawing, modelling, calculations, image processing, etc. Unfortunately, the hardware has died - failure in the chipset as far as I can determine. Even more unfortunately, quite a high proportion of the people who wrote the software I use have also died and there is no chance the software will be updated beyond XP.
I very rapidly found out that in any case there were no more quality Socket 1150 boards available to buy as this is, I believe, the last Intel incarnation that will run XP.
As a solution to this problem I am considering building a more modern PC capable of running a virtual machine which would contain the XP O/S and enable me to load the specialized software. First point to make: this machine will never be on the internet (other than to activate an O/S) and will never have carried any personal details, done any banking or even have contact lists. It is an engineering tool like a micrometer or set of feeler gauges.
I am a little reluctant to consider this option because I did some work around 2004 using VMWare Workstation to run some other specialized application software; I found it terribly slow and was quite disappointed. However, the intervening 14 years may have seen some small improvement in hardware performance, and hopefully even extensions so that some of these virtual machine instructions can now run in silicon rather than software.
It seems to me that there are a number of virtual machine 'flavours'. I have seen reference to full virtualization (provides a substitute for a real machine, by giving functionality to execute an entire operating system, process virtualization (execution of programs in a platform independent environment), operating system level virtualization (computer resources are partitioned by kernel support for many independently isolated user spaces or containers. I haven't yet discovered how some of the components relate to each other. Windows 10 appears to contain a mechanism called Virtual Box that allows a user to set up virtual machines, but I know very little about this facility.
So question #1: In such a case, Windows 10 is the host and the virtual machine generator (Virtual Box) runs under the host, at least that is what I think, but please correct me if I am wrong. Having generated a virtual machine, a second OS (XP) is loaded into this virtual machine, and then the applications are added afterwards. In order to get good performance Win 10 needs to address as much memory as I can economically provide. This suggests that I need a 64 bit version of Win 10. However, I will be loading a 32 bit version of XP to run 32 bit applications in what is essentially a 64 bit machine. Is this permitted?
Question #2: When running Win 10 I will presumably have access to all the machines resources. XP however, will run in a defined container. Will I still be able to access all the machine resources from an application running inside the container? Typically I will need to access (1) keyboard, (2) mouse, (3) HDD or SSD, (4) graphic card, (5) USB, (6) plotter (parallel port), (7) printer (serial port|), and (8) intranet via an isolated switch. Is there a mechanism for these devices to pierce the container wall in response to my actions within the 32 bit application software? For example, I might wish to plot a drawing.
The graphic card poses a particular problem. I have available both nVidia K2200 and nVidia K2200D. The former has 2 GB of graphic RAM and drivers for XP and Win 7...+; the latter has 6 GB graphic RAM, but no XP drivers, only Win 7...+ drivers. So if I am running Win 10 as the host for the VM, do the graphic calls out of the container get translated to Win 10 calls to the graphic card, thus allowing me to use the K2200D, or do the graphics calls get passed on unimpeded so that I have to keep using the K2200?
Question #3: Having generated files within an XP application, would they still be accessible from Win 10? For example, I might generate a .pdf document in an XP application, but might need to modify it in a Win 10 environment.
Question #4: Is Win 10 the right host for a VM? Are there any other VM's that might be considered?
Question #5: Does anybody have any recommendations for the actual motherboard hardware. I rather like the look of the ASUS boards with M2 and U2 connectivity, but their specifications do not mention form factors very much. I already have a nice case which uses a micro ATX form factor, so I'd like to continue using this and put the money saved into memory, a higher performance motherboard, etc.
Question #6: Related to the previous question, are there any recommendations for processor configuration in terms of cores, clock speed and the like.
Sorry this is a bit long, but thanks in advance for any advice that can be given.
Kind regards
cameronian
cameronian
OK, bad news first. I'm a near 74 year old engineer, and have very little experience with modern operating systems, though I have quite a bit with older systems.
For many years I've used a machine running Win XP Pro with SP3. Mainly this machine is used for technical work - engineering drawing, modelling, calculations, image processing, etc. Unfortunately, the hardware has died - failure in the chipset as far as I can determine. Even more unfortunately, quite a high proportion of the people who wrote the software I use have also died and there is no chance the software will be updated beyond XP.
I very rapidly found out that in any case there were no more quality Socket 1150 boards available to buy as this is, I believe, the last Intel incarnation that will run XP.
As a solution to this problem I am considering building a more modern PC capable of running a virtual machine which would contain the XP O/S and enable me to load the specialized software. First point to make: this machine will never be on the internet (other than to activate an O/S) and will never have carried any personal details, done any banking or even have contact lists. It is an engineering tool like a micrometer or set of feeler gauges.
I am a little reluctant to consider this option because I did some work around 2004 using VMWare Workstation to run some other specialized application software; I found it terribly slow and was quite disappointed. However, the intervening 14 years may have seen some small improvement in hardware performance, and hopefully even extensions so that some of these virtual machine instructions can now run in silicon rather than software.
It seems to me that there are a number of virtual machine 'flavours'. I have seen reference to full virtualization (provides a substitute for a real machine, by giving functionality to execute an entire operating system, process virtualization (execution of programs in a platform independent environment), operating system level virtualization (computer resources are partitioned by kernel support for many independently isolated user spaces or containers. I haven't yet discovered how some of the components relate to each other. Windows 10 appears to contain a mechanism called Virtual Box that allows a user to set up virtual machines, but I know very little about this facility.
So question #1: In such a case, Windows 10 is the host and the virtual machine generator (Virtual Box) runs under the host, at least that is what I think, but please correct me if I am wrong. Having generated a virtual machine, a second OS (XP) is loaded into this virtual machine, and then the applications are added afterwards. In order to get good performance Win 10 needs to address as much memory as I can economically provide. This suggests that I need a 64 bit version of Win 10. However, I will be loading a 32 bit version of XP to run 32 bit applications in what is essentially a 64 bit machine. Is this permitted?
Question #2: When running Win 10 I will presumably have access to all the machines resources. XP however, will run in a defined container. Will I still be able to access all the machine resources from an application running inside the container? Typically I will need to access (1) keyboard, (2) mouse, (3) HDD or SSD, (4) graphic card, (5) USB, (6) plotter (parallel port), (7) printer (serial port|), and (8) intranet via an isolated switch. Is there a mechanism for these devices to pierce the container wall in response to my actions within the 32 bit application software? For example, I might wish to plot a drawing.
The graphic card poses a particular problem. I have available both nVidia K2200 and nVidia K2200D. The former has 2 GB of graphic RAM and drivers for XP and Win 7...+; the latter has 6 GB graphic RAM, but no XP drivers, only Win 7...+ drivers. So if I am running Win 10 as the host for the VM, do the graphic calls out of the container get translated to Win 10 calls to the graphic card, thus allowing me to use the K2200D, or do the graphics calls get passed on unimpeded so that I have to keep using the K2200?
Question #3: Having generated files within an XP application, would they still be accessible from Win 10? For example, I might generate a .pdf document in an XP application, but might need to modify it in a Win 10 environment.
Question #4: Is Win 10 the right host for a VM? Are there any other VM's that might be considered?
Question #5: Does anybody have any recommendations for the actual motherboard hardware. I rather like the look of the ASUS boards with M2 and U2 connectivity, but their specifications do not mention form factors very much. I already have a nice case which uses a micro ATX form factor, so I'd like to continue using this and put the money saved into memory, a higher performance motherboard, etc.
Question #6: Related to the previous question, are there any recommendations for processor configuration in terms of cores, clock speed and the like.
Sorry this is a bit long, but thanks in advance for any advice that can be given.
Kind regards
cameronian
cameronian