Windows 10 Users Face Confusion as Unsupported PCs Get Windows 11 Upgrade Offers

A routine patch Tuesday on a mid-range Lenovo laptop spirals into confusion as Windows 10 users, who believed their unsupported hardware insulated them from Windows 11, suddenly receive upgrade invitations—despite stringent system requirements that, according to Microsoft, remain immovable and are publicly defended as essential for modern operating system security. This rare incident, detailed first by BornCity and amplified by Windows Central, spotlights the persistent tension among users approaching the fast-looming end of support for Windows 10, and it raises critical questions about Microsoft's upgrade mechanism, security priorities, and commitment to customer trust.

A Surprising Turn: Unsupported PCs Offered a Windows 11 Upgrade​

For many Windows users, system upgrades are a mix of excitement and apprehension. Windows 11’s official launch in 2021 brought with it stricter hardware requirements—most notably the need for TPM 2.0, which quickly became one of the most debated conditions for eligibility. Only recently did Windows 11 scrape ahead in market share, barely overtaking Windows 10 and now commanding around 50.88% of the global desktop OS market, by some counts.
Yet, not all systems meeting the minimum processor requirements necessarily make the full cut. Take the Lenovo IdeaPad S145-15IWL, a good mid-tier device equipped with an Intel 8th Gen i5 processor. By most checklists, this processor generation qualifies for Windows 11. However, TPM 2.0 must also be enabled in the BIOS—missing this, the device should be barred from the Windows 11 upgrade offer.
In the reported incident, a user specifically disabled TPM to block the Windows 11 upgrade, only for the system to tantalizingly dangle an official update regardless. The cause, as speculated, could be a temporary server-side bug or a BIOS configuration anomaly, but the user’s bafflement is shared by many who thought system requirement enforcement was absolute.

The Evolving Upgrade Campaign: From Aggressive to Persuasive​

Microsoft’s tactics for nudging Windows 10 users to leap forward have matured. After significant backlash over intrusive, full-screen prompts urging upgrades—widely derided by the community—Microsoft has pivoted toward emphasizing risk and future-proofing. Now, the language is one of safeguarding rather than pressure: users are urged to get on “the right side of risk” before critical Windows 10 security updates stop entirely on October 14, 2025.
This new approach is visible across Windows marketing, where Microsoft makes the bold claim that Copilot+ PCs are five times faster than the average 5-year-old Windows device—designed as both a carrot and a warning about the limits of old hardware. With the date of Windows 10’s support cutoff now just over two months away, urgency is building among the tens of millions still using the legacy OS.

Windows 11 System Requirements: The Strict Reality​

The core requirements for Windows 11 are non-negotiable, as reiterated by Microsoft in its December statements. Chief among them:

• TPM 2.0 (Trusted Platform Module): Provides a hardware-based crypto-processor that enhances data security and enables features like Windows Hello and BitLocker encryption.
• Secure Boot: UEFI-based, preventing unauthorized bootloaders and rootkits from infecting devices.
• 8th Generation or newer Intel CPUs: Excluded older but still perfectly functional hardware, leading to significant criticism.
• 4GB RAM and 64GB storage minimum.
• DirectX 12 compatible graphics.

The company maintains these measures are about "future-proofing" Windows, but for users with otherwise perfectly capable hardware, it has created frustration and forced obsolescence on an unprecedented scale.

The Risks of Pushing Past Compatibility Checks​

On the rare occasions when unsupported hardware is offered an upgrade, a host of risks—and opportunities—arise. In some instances, users on older, non-TPM-compliant machines have successfully run Windows 11, sometimes by using third-party scripts to bypass checks. However, Microsoft’s official stance is that unsupported devices may lose access to updates, including critical security patches—a significant liability for anyone storing sensitive data.
And the ramifications extend beyond security: drivers for older hardware may not be certified for Windows 11, leading to performance drops, instability, or bricked functionality—especially for niche peripherals.
Yet, for the technically savvy, the fact that Windows 11 can install and function on what Microsoft labels “unsupported” hardware reveals a difference between the practical possibility and the company’s chosen enforcement strategy. This muddled boundary not only confuses consumers but also complicates Microsoft’s own support and security guarantees.

Microsoft’s Windows 10 End-of-Life: What Are Your Options?​

With official security updates for Windows 10 ending on October 14, 2025, the pressure to upgrade is mounting. However, users are not without recourse:

1. Windows 10 ESU (Extended Security Updates)​

Microsoft will offer paid, per-device security updates for Windows 10 after support ends, at a rate of $30 per device for individuals in the first year. Historically, ESU was available only to larger organizations, but public backlash led Microsoft to extend availability to individual consumers and small businesses.

2. Free Security Updates via Microsoft Account Sync​

In an interesting twist, Microsoft will offer an extra year of security updates for free, but only if users sync their PC settings data with the cloud via a Microsoft Account. This gives users more time to upgrade or plan for device replacement, though it does have privacy implications and a novel element of tying continued security to cloud-based telemetry.

3. Riding Out Windows 10 Without Further Updates​

Some will opt to continue on their path, using Windows 10 unsupported. This is risky: exposure to unpatched vulnerabilities could lead to malware infections, data breaches, or ransomware. Both home and enterprise users should heed the warnings—especially with internet-facing devices.

The Public Responds: Pushback and Petitions​

The nonprofit Public Interest Research Group (PIRG) has been particularly vocal, arguing Microsoft’s current plan could trigger “the single biggest jump in junked computers ever,” given that many devices are blocked from upgrading to Windows 11 not due to performance, but artificial barriers. PIRG’s demands are two-fold:

• Automatic longer-term support for Windows 10, citing e-waste and environmental concerns.
• Reconsideration of the narrow hardware requirements for Windows 11.

Microsoft has already conceded ground by making ESU accessible to individuals, providing schools with affordable pricing, and launching a new OneDrive-linked option for free extended updates. However, they have stopped short of relaxing Windows 11’s hardware rules or extending Windows 10 support beyond the pre-announced window. PIRG remains unsatisfied, arguing that users “feel yanked around” and see the latest operations as inadequate.

The Security Argument: TPM 2.0 and Future-Proofing​

Microsoft has repeatedly justified TPM 2.0 as essential for hardware-based security. Indeed, TPM 2.0 does enable more robust BitLocker encryption, protections against credential theft, and foundations for Windows Hello. Security analysts generally agree that systems lacking this chip are more vulnerable to certain classes of attacks, especially those targeting pre-boot phases or relying on physical access.
But the flip side is that many users, particularly those with enterprise-grade or slightly older consumer machines, are being asked to replace perfectly functional hardware—a cost and environmental burden that many see as disproportionate, given that alternative OS options (Linux, ChromeOS Flex) remain viable on these same systems. In a world increasingly conscious of e-waste, Microsoft’s approach faces growing scrutiny.

Actual Incidents: How Often Does This Happen?​

While the BornCity case is remarkable, there haven’t been widespread reports of unsupported hardware being accidentally invited to upgrade since Windows 11’s release. Most users attempting forced upgrades must use scripts or registry hacks. Microsoft’s update servers, for the most part, enforce the hardware requirements strictly.
Still, the optical damage from even a few such incidents is considerable, lending credence to conspiracy theories about Microsoft “testing the waters” or quietly piloting expanded compatibility. Technically, explanations range from bugs in the Windows Update algorithm to misreported hardware data (BIOS or firmware updates altering system reporting, for instance).

Business Impact and the Race for New Hardware​

It isn’t just consumers feeling the stress: businesses managing fleets of older but still performant PCs must now decide whether to absorb the cost of upgrades, enroll in paid ESU, or risk running unsupported. For Microsoft’s hardware partners, this is a bonanza—fresh demand as organizations scramble to avoid ticking security time bombs. For smaller organizations or schools, though, even $30 per device can rapidly balloon.
This dynamic also intersects with Microsoft’s splashy push for Copilot+ PCs, the next wave of AI-enhanced Windows devices supposed to revolutionize workflow, gaming, and creativity. By positioning older systems as not just slower but less secure, Microsoft seeks to accelerate natural PC churn. Yet, some see this less as progress and more as forced obsolescence by marketing fiat.

Alternatives for the Stubborn or Cautious​

For those who can’t or won’t upgrade—or who refuse to send aging but functional hardware to the landfill—a handful of alternatives present themselves:

• Install Linux or ChromeOS Flex: Several distros require much less overhead than Windows 11 and can breathe new life into unsupported machines.
• Isolate Legacy Windows 10 Devices: Remove them from the internet, use for non-critical workloads, or deploy in tightly controlled environments to mitigate risk.
• Migrate Data and Apps: Begin a phased approach now, shifting essential data and workloads to new hardware or cloud environments before the cutoff.

Critical Analysis: Where Microsoft Excels and Where It Fails​

Strengths​

• Security-First Approach: Microsoft’s insistence on TPM 2.0 and Secure Boot is grounded in valid security concerns. The threat landscape demands modern defenses, and consumer confusion over these features would likely be higher if introduced piecemeal.
• New Flexibility for Individuals: Extending ESU to all users, not just organizations, acknowledges the reality that not everyone can upgrade immediately.
• Increased Transparency: Detailed documentation around requirements, and public statements on the reasoning, make the company's stance clear even if unpopular.

Weaknesses and Risks​

• Perceived Forced Obsolescence: Many consumers and enterprises feel compelled to junk usable PCs; this causes financial pain, trust erosion, and environmental damage.
• Mixed Messaging: Cases like the BornCity report, even if rare, reveal holes in the wall Microsoft built around Windows 11 upgrades. A single incident can erode months of carefully orchestrated messaging.
• Inadequate Support for Edge Cases: Some devices teeter on the edge of compatibility—8th Gen CPUs but poorly documented TPM status, for example. The clarity of upgrade paths remains lacking for these users.
• E-waste and Environmental Impact: Critics argue that Microsoft’s approach prioritizes hardware partners and new sales over sustainability. PIRG’s warning about a jump in junked computers is hard to dismiss.
• Inconsistent Global Experience: In some regions, access to ESU or new hardware remains low, compounding digital divide issues.

The Bottom Line: Prepare or Get Left Behind​

With the October 2025 deadline in sharp focus, the time for inaction is running out. Most users of Windows 10 hardware that meets Windows 11’s requirements should upgrade at their earliest convenience for continued support and improved security. But for millions whose devices are left behind—either by TPM mandates or simple age—the situation is less clear.
Microsoft’s message is unapologetic: the future is Windows 11 or newer, with only temporary off-ramps for die-hards. Whether that future is truly more secure, sustainable, and customer-focused remains under debate, especially as rare incidents like the recent botched upgrade offer circulate through tech forums and media.
In this complex landscape, one thing remains certain: every Windows user must now make an informed choice, balancing security, cost, environmental impact, and practicality. As the clock ticks down, the stakes for getting that choice right have never been higher.

---

Source: Windows Central Microsoft mysteriously offered a Windows 11 upgrade to this unsupported Windows 10 PC — despite it failing to meet the "non-negotiable" TPM 2.0 requirement