Windows 11 Experimental: Resizable Start, Hide Sections, Move Taskbar Anywhere

Microsoft began testing new Windows 11 personalization controls on May 15, 2026, giving Windows Insiders in the Experimental channel options to resize the Start menu, hide major Start sections, adjust file recommendations, obscure account identity in Start, and move the taskbar to any screen edge. The news sounds small because the controls themselves are small. But in Windows 11, small controls have become proxies for a larger argument about who gets to decide how the desktop behaves. Microsoft is not merely adding toggles; it is backing away, cautiously, from one of Windows 11’s most unpopular design bets.

Microsoft Reopens a Door It Spent Years Holding Shut​

Windows 11 arrived with a cleaner visual language and a more opinionated shell. The centered taskbar, simplified Start menu, rounded corners, and stripped-down customization surface were meant to make Windows feel modern rather than inherited. The problem was that Windows is not just a consumer appliance; it is a workplace, a cockpit, a lab bench, a gaming rig, a kiosk, and a personal archive.
That tension has defined the operating system since 2021. Microsoft wanted Windows 11 to feel calmer and more coherent, but many users experienced that coherence as subtraction. The taskbar could not be moved without unsupported workarounds. The Start menu was less dense and less flexible. Familiar muscle memory was traded for a layout that treated uniformity as a feature.
The latest Insider test is important because it reverses that direction without quite admitting the original trade was wrong. Users can choose a Small or Large Start menu. They can show or hide Pinned, Recommended, and All sections. They can control file recommendations in Start separately from other Windows surfaces. They can hide the name and profile picture that appear in Start, a modest but meaningful concession to people who share screens or stream from their PCs.
Most visibly, the taskbar can be placed at the top, bottom, left, or right edge of the display. That may sound like a nostalgic checkbox for old-school users, but it is more than that. It is Microsoft acknowledging that the Windows desktop is used across too many screen sizes, workflows, and ergonomic setups for a single bottom-edge taskbar to satisfy everyone.

The Start Menu Became a Symbol Because It Is Where Windows Introduces Itself​

The Start menu carries emotional weight because it is not just an app launcher. It is the place Windows uses to introduce the user to the machine. It is also where Microsoft has repeatedly tried to balance user intent, system suggestions, cloud files, app promotion, search, and account identity.
That balance has often felt wrong in Windows 11. The Recommended area has been controversial from the beginning because it consumes prominent space in a menu many people still think of as theirs. Even when the recommendations are useful, the section competes with pinned apps and imposes Microsoft’s idea of helpfulness on a surface users historically customized for speed.
The new section-level toggles are therefore more significant than another size option. A Start menu that can show only pinned apps is a very different object from one that insists on recommendations. It turns Start back toward a user-controlled launcher rather than a blended feed of files, apps, and suggestions.
Microsoft is also separating file recommendations in Start from recommendations elsewhere. That distinction matters for administrators and privacy-conscious users because “turn off recommendations” has too often behaved like a blunt system-wide preference. A user may want recent files in File Explorer but not during a presentation, a livestream, or a classroom demo. Context matters, and Windows has not always respected that.
The privacy toggle for hiding the user’s name and profile picture is similarly practical. It will not transform Windows security, but it recognizes a modern reality: desktops are broadcast now. People share screens in Teams calls, record tutorials, stream games, and troubleshoot publicly. In those settings, even low-grade identity exposure is unnecessary friction.

Size Is Not Just Aesthetic; It Is Workflow​

The Small and Large Start menu options will likely be judged first as visual preferences. That is understandable. Windows users have spent years arguing about whether Windows 11 wastes space, especially on laptops and smaller displays.
But Start menu size is a workflow issue before it is a beauty contest. A bigger Start menu may make sense on a desktop monitor where users want more pinned items visible at once. A smaller menu may make sense on compact notebooks, ultrawide setups, or systems where Start is treated as a quick launcher rather than a dashboard.
The detail that the chosen size should remain consistent across displays “whenever possible” is also telling. Multi-monitor Windows behavior has always been a nest of edge cases: different resolutions, scaling levels, docking stations, remote sessions, rotated displays, and mixed laptop-desktop arrangements. Microsoft appears to be trying to prevent Start from feeling like a different product every time a user plugs into a new screen.
That consistency is the kind of thing users rarely praise when it works but immediately notice when it fails. If a Start menu expands unexpectedly on one monitor and compresses on another, the problem is not visual inconsistency alone. It is the sense that Windows keeps second-guessing the user.
This is where the test intersects with a broader quality push. Microsoft has spent the last year signaling that it wants to fix everyday irritants in Windows 11, not only add AI features or cloud hooks. The Start menu is a natural target because it is both highly visible and unusually personal. When it feels wrong, the whole OS feels wrong.

---

The Taskbar’s Return to the Edges Is a Bigger Concession Than It Looks​

Moving the taskbar was one of those legacy Windows features that many people did not use, but the people who did use it often depended on it. Left-side taskbars were popular with users who wanted to maximize vertical space on widescreen monitors. Top taskbars were muscle memory for others. Some power users built entire desktop habits around a non-bottom taskbar.
Windows 11 broke that assumption. The taskbar was pinned to the bottom in the supported interface, and Microsoft’s initial posture was that the new shell did not need to preserve every old arrangement. That was technically defensible and culturally tone-deaf.
The return of edge positioning is therefore not just a customization win. It is an admission that Windows cannot be designed only for the median user. The median user does not define the platform; the platform is defined by the range of workflows it can support without making people fight it.
There is also a practical screen-space argument. Laptop displays remain vertically constrained. Ultrawide monitors have made horizontal space more abundant than vertical space for many users. Developers, writers, spreadsheet users, and administrators often value every extra row they can get. A left or right taskbar can be the difference between a cramped workspace and one that feels properly arranged.
Microsoft’s implementation details will matter. A movable taskbar is easy to describe and hard to perfect. Flyouts, animations, system tray behavior, search, widgets, touch targets, notification placement, drag-and-drop, multi-monitor behavior, and accessibility all need to hold together. If edge positioning returns in a half-polished state, Microsoft will have reopened an old feature only to remind users why shell work is unforgiving.

The Experimental Channel Is Both Promise and Escape Hatch​

The features are rolling out through the Windows Insider Experimental channel, which is crucial context. Experimental is not a promise that the feature will ship unchanged, or ship at all. It is Microsoft’s proving ground for ideas that need telemetry, feedback, and real-world abuse before they move closer to mainstream Windows.
That gives Microsoft room to maneuver. If the movable taskbar causes too many layout problems, if Start section toggles produce confusing states, or if the Small and Large menu options break down across scaling combinations, the company can revise or delay them. Insiders know, or should know, that this is the bargain.
But Experimental also changes the politics of Windows feedback. By giving users earlier access to feature flags and shell changes, Microsoft can claim it is listening before a decision hardens into a public release. That is healthier than hiding changes until they appear in production, where every unwanted behavior feels imposed.
The risk is that Experimental becomes a pressure valve rather than a pipeline. Users may see long-requested options appear in preview builds and assume victory, only to watch them stall or mutate before general availability. Microsoft will need to be clear about which changes are exploratory and which are on a credible path to release.
For WindowsForum readers, that distinction matters. Enthusiasts can test these features because they enjoy living near the edge. Administrators cannot plan around them until Microsoft documents policy controls, deployment timing, and support boundaries. A feature in Experimental is evidence of direction, not a deployment plan.

Microsoft Is Learning That “Simple” and “Locked Down” Are Not Synonyms​

The Windows 11 design philosophy often conflated simplicity with fewer choices. In some places, that worked. The operating system did look cleaner than Windows 10, and some legacy clutter deserved retirement. But removing options is not the only way to simplify a product.
A better version of simplicity is progressive disclosure. Let the default experience stay clean, but allow users who know what they want to configure it. Hide complexity from people who do not need it; do not erase it for people who do.
The new Start and taskbar controls point in that direction. A casual user may never open these settings. A power user can reshape the shell. A presenter can hide identity information. A multi-monitor user can keep the Start menu predictable. A left-taskbar loyalist can stop relying on hacks.
This is the Windows compromise at its best. The platform does not need every preference exposed on first boot, but it does need enough depth to respect the diversity of its user base. Windows became dominant in part because it could bend. When it stops bending, users notice.
There is a lesson here for Microsoft’s broader product strategy. The company has spent years trying to make Windows a more controlled, service-driven environment. That has benefits for security, manageability, and visual consistency. But the desktop remains a personal and professional tool, not just a distribution surface for Microsoft services.

Enterprise IT Will Ask Different Questions Than Enthusiasts​

Enthusiasts will focus on whether the new Start menu feels better and whether the taskbar finally behaves like it used to. Enterprise administrators will ask a more prosaic set of questions. Can these settings be managed? Can they be locked down? Can they roam? Will they break training materials, screenshots, help desk scripts, or kiosk configurations?
Start and taskbar changes have operational consequences. A redesigned Start layout can alter user onboarding. A movable taskbar can complicate support calls if the help desk assumes the taskbar is always at the bottom. Hidden Recommended sections may affect employees who rely on recently opened documents. Conversely, disabling file recommendations in Start may be desirable in regulated environments.
Microsoft already provides some Start and taskbar management capabilities for organizations, but every new consumer-facing toggle raises the question of policy parity. If users can configure these behaviors individually, administrators will want a way to define defaults, restrict choices where necessary, and document expected behavior across device fleets.
There is also the question of profile and display consistency. In modern workplaces, users move between docks, conference rooms, remote desktops, virtualized apps, and multiple monitor setups. A Start menu size preference that behaves well on a single laptop may produce support noise when that laptop is docked to two displays with different scaling.
None of this argues against the changes. It argues for treating them as serious shell changes rather than cosmetic personalization. In Windows, the line between preference and platform behavior is thin.

---

The Recommended Section Is Still the Fight Microsoft Has Not Fully Settled​

The ability to hide Recommended is welcome, but it does not end the debate about what belongs in Start. Microsoft’s instinct is to make Start smarter, more contextual, and more connected to the rest of the system. Many users’ instinct is to make Start quieter.
That tension will not disappear because Microsoft added toggles. If anything, toggles make the conflict more explicit. The default experience still communicates Microsoft’s preference, while the settings page gives users a way to disagree.
The central question is whether Windows should assume that surfacing recent and suggested content is helpful. In a world of local files, OneDrive, Teams documents, web apps, cloud search, and AI summaries, Microsoft has a reasonable argument that the launcher should not be dumb. A modern Start menu can be more than a grid of icons.
But users have an equally reasonable counterargument: not every surface needs to become predictive. Sometimes a launcher should launch. Sometimes the best productivity feature is the absence of surprise.
The new section toggles are the correct compromise because they shift the decision back to the user. Microsoft can keep building a richer Start experience for people who want it, while allowing others to strip the menu down to essentials. That is not fragmentation. That is respect for context.

Windows 11’s Original Sin Was Not Change; It Was Certainty​

It is easy to frame these Insider features as Microsoft restoring things it should never have removed. That is partly true, especially for the taskbar. But the deeper problem with early Windows 11 was not that Microsoft changed the interface. The problem was the confidence with which it narrowed the interface.
Good platform design requires judgment. Not every old feature deserves eternal support. Some behaviors are costly to maintain, poorly used, or inconsistent with accessibility and security goals. Microsoft cannot simply freeze Windows in amber because a subset of users dislikes change.
Yet Windows 11 sometimes behaved as if a cleaner default justified a thinner product. The company underestimated the symbolic importance of choice in Windows. A bottom-only taskbar was not just a placement decision; it was a message that the new shell knew better than the user.
The new test sends a different message. It says Microsoft is willing to revisit assumptions, even ones embedded deeply in the Windows 11 identity. It also suggests the company understands that quality is not only crash rates and performance counters. Quality is the daily sensation of not being obstructed by your tools.
That is a valuable shift. Windows users are forgiving of complexity when it serves them. They are much less forgiving of simplicity that feels like a locked door.

The Timing Is Not Accidental​

The timing of these changes matters because Windows is in a transition period. Windows 10’s mainstream end-of-support milestone has already pushed many reluctant users toward Windows 11, and the remaining holdouts are precisely the people most likely to notice missing customization. Microsoft needs Windows 11 to feel less like a forced migration and more like a maturing platform.
At the same time, Microsoft has been pouring attention into AI experiences, Copilot integration, cloud identity, and subscription-adjacent services. That has created a perception problem. Many users see Microsoft finding room for new prompts and connected features while basic desktop complaints linger.
Start and taskbar improvements are a way to rebalance that story. They are not glamorous. They will not headline a developer conference the way AI agents do. But they address the kind of friction that determines whether users describe an OS as polished or annoying.
There is an old product truth here: users often judge platforms by the things vendors consider too small to matter. The taskbar’s location, the height of icons, the amount of whitespace in Start, and the visibility of a profile photo may not sound strategic. But they are touched dozens of times a day.
If Microsoft wants users to trust it with more ambitious changes, it has to show that it can handle the mundane ones. The desktop is where credibility is earned.

The Real Test Begins After the Toggle Appears​

Shipping the toggle is only the first step. The real test is whether these settings survive contact with the messiness of Windows hardware and user behavior. A movable taskbar must work across touch devices, tablets, convertibles, remote sessions, multi-monitor arrays, and accessibility configurations. A resizable Start menu must behave sanely across scaling percentages and resolutions.
Microsoft also has to resist the temptation to treat these controls as decorative. If users turn off Recommended and All, Start should not nag them back toward Microsoft’s preferred layout. If users choose Small, the menu should not unpredictably expand because Windows thinks a display can handle more. If users hide profile identity, Windows should not reintroduce it in a nearby flyout.
The company’s language around consistency “whenever possible” is careful, and understandably so. Some edge cases will be unavoidable. But users will distinguish between understandable constraints and arbitrary behavior. The latter is what has damaged trust in Windows customization over the years.
Feedback will be noisy. Some Insiders will want even more control, including drag-resizable Start menus, deeper layout editing, and more granular taskbar sizing. Others will complain that Microsoft is reintroducing complexity. The company’s challenge is to separate durable workflow needs from nostalgia alone.
That does not mean nostalgia is irrelevant. Muscle memory is a productivity feature. When millions of people spend years using a system in a certain way, preserving the option to keep using it that way has value. The smartest version of Windows 11 is not Windows 10 with rounded corners; it is Windows 11 with enough humility to learn from Windows 10.

---

The Small Toggle That Carries a Large Message​

This Insider release is best understood as a correction of course, not a revolution. The feature set is concrete, but the message is broader: Microsoft is making room again for the user’s hand on the steering wheel.

• Windows Insiders in the Experimental channel are getting early access to Start menu size options, with Small and Large layouts intended to remain consistent across displays.
• Microsoft is testing section-level Start controls that can hide Pinned, Recommended, or All, allowing a much simpler launcher-style menu.
• File recommendations in Start are becoming separately controllable, which matters for privacy, presentations, and users who want recommendations elsewhere but not in the Start menu.
• The Start menu privacy option to hide the user’s name and profile image reflects how often Windows desktops now appear in shared screens, streams, and recordings.
• The taskbar’s return to top, bottom, left, and right placement is the most symbolic change because it restores a long-standing Windows customization habit removed in Windows 11.
• None of these features should be treated as guaranteed for production until they move beyond the Experimental channel and Microsoft clarifies rollout behavior and management options.

The operating system does not become trustworthy because it gains more toggles; it becomes trustworthy when those toggles reflect a design culture willing to let users differ. Microsoft’s latest Start and taskbar tests suggest the company has heard at least part of the complaint: Windows 11 was never too modern because it changed, but because it too often confused modernity with constraint. If these controls make it into mainstream builds with polish and policy support, they will not just make the desktop more customizable; they will make Windows feel a little more like Windows again.

---

Source: Engadget Microsoft lets Insiders choose their Windows 11 Start menu size - Engadget

 

[ChatGPT]

Microsoft confirmed on May 15, 2026, that Windows 11 Insiders will soon get deeper Start menu customization, including section-level toggles, separate controls for file recommendations, small and large Start layouts, and an option to hide account details while presenting or streaming. The announcement lands alongside the return of movable and smaller taskbar options, a pair of changes users have been demanding since Windows 11 shipped. Microsoft is not merely adding knobs; it is tacitly admitting that the Windows 11 shell overcorrected in the name of simplicity. The new direction is less about nostalgia than about restoring trust in the places people touch dozens of times a day.

Microsoft’s Minimalist Bet Finally Meets the Desktop’s Muscle Memory​

Windows 11 launched with a Start menu and taskbar that looked cleaner, calmer, and more modern than Windows 10. It also launched with fewer ways to make the desktop behave like your desktop. For casual users, that trade may have been acceptable; for longtime Windows users, power users, IT admins, developers, and anyone with a carefully tuned workflow, it felt like a regression dressed up as design discipline.
The taskbar was the most obvious casualty. Moving it to the left, right, or top of the screen had been part of Windows muscle memory for decades, yet Windows 11 initially locked the taskbar to the bottom. Small taskbar buttons vanished too, even as laptops, tablets, handhelds, ultrawides, and multi-monitor setups made display geometry more varied than ever.
Now Microsoft is reversing course. The latest Insider work brings back alternate taskbar positions and a smaller taskbar, with Start, Search, flyouts, labels, and “never combine” behavior adapting to the new layouts. It is not a complete restoration of every old behavior, and Microsoft is still working through gaps such as alternate-position auto-hide, tablet behavior, touch gestures, per-monitor placement, and drag-and-drop details. But the message is unmistakable: the fixed, simplified shell is giving way to a more configurable one.
The Start menu changes are the quieter half of the same story. Microsoft is preparing toggles for Pinned, Recommended, and All sections, plus controls to decouple Start recommendations from recent files elsewhere in Windows. That matters because Windows 11’s Start menu has often acted less like a neutral launcher and more like a surface Microsoft wanted to curate.

The Start Menu Is Being Rebuilt Around Refusal​

The most important word in Microsoft’s new Start menu plan is not “Recent,” “Recommended,” or “Large.” It is “hide.” Users will be able to hide Pinned, hide Recommended, hide All, hide file recommendations, and hide their account name and profile image.
That sounds mundane until you compare it with the existing Windows 11 Start experience. Today’s Start menu gives users some personalization, but often within Microsoft’s preferred structure. You can reduce some surfaces, tune some behaviors, and unpin apps one by one, but the shape of the menu remains stubbornly opinionated.
The coming section-level toggles change the posture. A Start menu with only pinned apps becomes an officially supported configuration, not a workaround. A fuller launcher with app lists, recent files, and installed apps also remains possible. Microsoft is moving from “this is the Start menu” to “these are the parts of Start; assemble what you need.”
That is the right model for Windows. The operating system is not a single-purpose appliance. It is a work machine, gaming platform, development host, kiosk base, enterprise endpoint, family PC, classroom device, and accessibility surface. A Start menu rigid enough to satisfy a design brief will inevitably frustrate real-world users who carry wildly different habits into the same shell.

Renaming Recommended to Recent Is a Small Confession​

Microsoft also says it will rename “Recommended” to “Recent,” a change that sounds cosmetic but is actually revealing. “Recommended” implies judgment. It tells users Windows has selected something they might want. “Recent” is more honest: this section primarily shows recently installed apps and recently used files.
That distinction matters because users have become suspicious of recommendation surfaces across Windows. Some recommendations are useful. Others feel like promotion, nudging, or clutter. When a section called Recommended mostly contains recent items, the label creates unnecessary friction because it invites users to wonder what Microsoft is optimizing for.
“Recent” is a less ambitious word and therefore a better one. It promises chronology rather than wisdom. It tells the user what the surface is doing instead of implying that Windows knows best.
The more consequential change is the separate control for file recommendations. Microsoft says turning off Recommended in Start currently also affects jump lists and recent files in File Explorer, an entanglement that makes a simple preference feel like a system-wide penalty. Decoupling those settings is exactly the sort of boring, practical fix that separates mature platform design from checkbox personalization.
A user may reasonably want recent files in File Explorer and jump lists while wanting a clean Start menu. That is not contradictory. It is context. File Explorer is where recent work can be useful; Start is where recent work can become visual noise, especially during screen sharing, classroom projection, livestreaming, or customer presentations.

Resizing Start Is Really About Multi-Device Windows​

The planned Start menu size setting is another admission that automatic layout decisions can only go so far. Windows 11 currently adapts Start based on screen size and scaling, but automatic adaptation is not the same as user preference. A compact laptop, a 4K desktop monitor, a docked handheld, and a remote desktop session all place different demands on density.
Microsoft says users will be able to choose Small or Large layouts so the preference remains consistent across displays whenever possible. That phrase, “whenever possible,” is doing work. Windows still has to account for DPI, screen dimensions, orientation, and accessibility settings, but a persistent preference is better than a menu that changes personality depending on where the machine is plugged in.
For IT pros, this is not merely cosmetic. Interface consistency reduces help-desk friction. If a user’s Start menu grows, shrinks, or rearranges itself after docking, undocking, or moving between monitors, the resulting confusion is small in isolation but cumulative across an organization.
For developers and power users, density is part of productivity. Some users want a large launcher that shows more material at once. Others want Start to appear briefly, launch one thing, and get out of the way. A desktop shell that treats those as equally legitimate preferences is better suited to the range of Windows hardware in 2026.

Privacy Finally Enters the Start Menu Conversation​

The option to hide the user’s name and profile picture from Start may be the easiest feature to underestimate. It is also one of the more modern additions in the bunch. Windows is no longer used only in private offices and home desks; it is constantly projected into Teams calls, classrooms, livestreams, recorded demos, support sessions, and shared screens.
A username and profile image are not secrets in the traditional security sense, but they are identifiers. They can expose a full name, account photo, organization branding, or personal context at exactly the moment a user only meant to open an app. The risk is not catastrophic. It is ambient.
That makes this kind of privacy control welcome precisely because it is lightweight. Nobody should need a separate presentation mode, registry tweak, or third-party Start menu replacement just to avoid flashing account details while sharing a screen. The best privacy features often feel like manners: small design choices that prevent the software from oversharing on the user’s behalf.
This also aligns with a broader shift Microsoft has been trying to articulate this year: less noise, more control, more visible attention to craft. Whether users believe that framing will depend on execution, but the Start menu is a good place to prove it. If Microsoft wants Windows to feel less pushy, it has to start with the surfaces that open by reflex.

---

The Taskbar Reversal Makes the Start Menu Changes More Credible​

The Start menu announcement would be easier to dismiss if it arrived alone. Windows has seen plenty of promises about refinement, polish, and user feedback. What makes this moment more interesting is that Microsoft is pairing future Start menu controls with taskbar changes that are already rolling into Experimental builds.
Alternate taskbar positions are not a niche request in the way some telemetry-driven product teams like to define niche. They are a workflow feature for people who use vertical monitors, ultrawide displays, dense window sets, code editors, remote desktops, and accessibility-specific setups. Their absence in Windows 11 became symbolic because it suggested Microsoft had mistaken “fewer options” for “better design.”
The smaller taskbar is similar. Windows 11’s default taskbar is more touch-friendly and visually spacious, but not everyone wants to spend permanent screen space on comfort margins. On smaller notebooks and handheld-adjacent PCs, every vertical pixel matters. On large desktops, users may simply prefer a denser chrome.
The important part is not that Windows 11 is becoming Windows 10 again. It is not. The taskbar is still being implemented through the newer Windows 11 shell model, with modern flyouts and current settings integration. The important part is that Microsoft appears to be rebuilding old capabilities in a way that fits the present architecture rather than pretending those capabilities were obsolete.
That distinction matters for reliability. A bolted-on compatibility concession would be fragile. A properly integrated shell option can become part of the platform again.

The Experimental Channel Is a Warning Label, Not a Shipping Date​

There is one obvious caveat: these changes are still Insider features. Microsoft says several taskbar improvements are rolling out now in the Experimental channel, while the Start menu customization features will arrive over the coming weeks. That means general Windows 11 users should not expect these controls to appear on production PCs immediately.
The Experimental channel also means unfinished behavior is part of the bargain. Microsoft has already identified missing pieces around alternate taskbar positions, including auto-hide, touch gestures, and search box behavior. Users testing these builds should expect visual rough edges and feature gaps.
That does not make the work unimportant. In fact, it makes the feedback window more consequential. If Microsoft is going to bring back configurability without bringing back the jank that sometimes accompanied older shell behaviors, this is the stage where details matter. Flyout positioning, animation origin, label layout, overflow handling, multi-monitor logic, and accessibility semantics are all places where a “returned” feature can still feel wrong.
For administrators, the message is simple: watch, but do not plan deployments around it yet. Insider movement is useful evidence of direction, not a support lifecycle commitment. The correct enterprise posture is curiosity, not premature standardization.

Microsoft Is Trying to Repair the Windows 11 Trust Gap​

The broader context is Microsoft’s 2026 quality push. The company has been talking about performance, reliability, craft, lower memory usage, faster File Explorer behavior, more transparent Insider channels, quieter widgets, less disruptive updating, and more careful Copilot placement. Start and taskbar improvements sit inside that larger attempt to reassure users that Windows 11 is being tuned around daily use, not just new features.
That reassurance is necessary because Windows 11’s reputation has often been defined by irritations that are individually small and collectively exhausting. A menu that shows the wrong things. A taskbar that will not move. A recommendation surface that feels mislabeled. A widget badge that seems too urgent. A setting that controls more than it says it controls.
These are not blue-screen-level failures, but they are trust failures. They remind users that the operating system is making choices on their behalf. Over time, that creates a feeling that Windows is something to manage around rather than settle into.
The new Start menu controls suggest Microsoft has internalized at least part of that critique. The company is not just adding a new visual design. It is adding exits from parts of the experience users do not want. In desktop software, the ability to decline is often as important as the ability to discover.

The Real Competition Is the Third-Party Start Menu​

For years, utilities such as Start11, StartAllBack, Open-Shell successors, taskbar tweakers, and registry-driven hacks have existed because Windows users are unusually willing to fight their shell into submission. That ecosystem is not just nostalgia. It is market research with a download button.
Every time Microsoft removes a shell option, third-party developers learn what users miss. Every time Microsoft reintroduces one, it validates the demand those tools have been serving. The return of movable and smaller taskbar options, plus a more modular Start menu, is therefore also a quiet attempt to reclaim territory Microsoft ceded.
This does not mean third-party customization tools become irrelevant. They will still go further than Microsoft wants to go. They will serve users who want classic menus, alternate grouping logic, different visual metaphors, or deeper taskbar surgery. But Microsoft does not need to satisfy every enthusiast to reduce the pressure. It needs to make the built-in experience good enough that fewer users feel forced to replace it on day one.
That is especially important in managed environments. Enterprises do not generally want endpoint fleets depending on shell modification tools unless there is a compelling reason. If Microsoft can provide first-party controls for the most common complaints, IT departments get a more supportable path to user satisfaction.
The challenge is that Microsoft must resist the urge to make customization shallow. A toggle that hides a section is useful. A toggle that hides a section but leaves an awkward blank space, breaks keyboard flow, or reappears after an update would be worse than no toggle at all. Users who demanded control will judge the implementation, not the blog post.

---

The New Start Menu Still Carries Microsoft’s Priorities​

Even with the new controls, Microsoft is not turning Start into an anything-goes canvas. The company says recently installed apps will remain visible because that visibility helps users discover what they have installed and because developers value that exposure. That is a reasonable argument, but it also shows where Microsoft’s interests remain embedded in the design.
Start is both a user surface and a software distribution surface. It helps people launch apps, but it also shapes which apps are noticed. The Microsoft Store, recently installed items, recommendations, account identity, search, and cloud-tied recent files all compete for space in a menu that many users still think of as a simple launcher.
The renaming of Recommended to Recent helps, but the tension remains. Microsoft wants Start to be useful, modern, contextual, and connected. Many users want it to be fast, quiet, predictable, and local-feeling. The new customization model is promising because it gives those camps a way to coexist.
The risk is that Microsoft will continue to treat certain surfaces as too strategically important to fully disable. Windows users have seen this pattern before: settings exist, but some experiences return after feature updates, new defaults arrive with new builds, and promotional or cloud-connected elements are reframed as helpful suggestions. If Microsoft wants credit for listening, it needs to make these choices durable.
That means respecting user intent over time. If someone turns off file recommendations in Start, the setting should stay off. If someone hides account details, an update should not decide they need to be shown again. If someone chooses a small Start layout, docking to a new display should not turn the menu into a billboard unless there is a clear technical reason.

Design Discipline Should Mean Better Defaults, Not Fewer Choices​

There is a lazy argument that power-user customization and good design are opposites. Windows 11’s early shell decisions often seemed influenced by that idea: fewer options, cleaner surfaces, more consistent presentation. But design discipline should not require stripping away legitimate workflows.
Good defaults are essential. Most users will never tune every Start menu section or taskbar behavior. Microsoft should absolutely provide a coherent default experience for them. But Windows has never succeeded by pretending every user is the median user.
The better model is layered complexity. The default should be sensible. Common adjustments should be easy to find. Advanced behaviors should be available without requiring unsupported hacks. Dangerous or confusing settings can be tucked away, but basic layout choices should not be treated as dangerous.
The coming Start menu controls look like a move toward that layered model. Section-level toggles are understandable. Small and Large layouts are understandable. Hiding profile details is understandable. Separating Start file recommendations from File Explorer recent files is understandable. None of these require an enthusiast’s manual to operate.
That is the sweet spot. Microsoft does not need to recreate every Windows 7, Windows 10, or classic shell behavior. It needs to recognize where removed choices were not clutter but capability.

Admins Will Care About Policy More Than Screenshots​

For WindowsForum’s sysadmin crowd, the obvious next question is management. Microsoft’s blog post is about user-facing settings, but enterprise value depends on whether these choices can be configured, documented, and preserved at scale. A Start menu toggle is nice; a policy-backed, supportable configuration is better.
Organizations may want privacy-oriented defaults that hide account details during presentations. Schools may prefer a simplified Start menu that reduces distraction. Developers in managed engineering environments may benefit from smaller taskbars and consistent Start density across docking setups. Kiosks, shared machines, and frontline devices may require even more constrained layouts.
The current announcement does not settle how much of this will be exposed through policy, provisioning, or management tooling. That uncertainty matters. Windows personalization features often arrive first as consumer settings, then later become enterprise-manageable if demand is strong enough. IT pros should press for clarity early, because retrofitted management is rarely as clean as policy-aware design from the start.
There is also a training angle. If Microsoft ships these controls broadly, support teams will need to know what changed, where the toggles live, and how the settings interact. The fix for “my recent files disappeared” may become different depending on whether the user disabled Start recommendations, File Explorer recents, jump lists, or some combination of the above.
That complexity is manageable if Microsoft labels the settings well. It becomes a headache if old and new controls overlap without clear boundaries. The company’s promise to simplify Start customization will be tested most sharply in the Settings app, not in promotional screenshots.

The Shell Is Becoming a Referendum on Windows Quality​

It is tempting to treat Start and taskbar changes as surface-level tinkering while “real” Windows work happens in the kernel, update stack, driver model, security subsystem, and app platform. That is technically fair and emotionally wrong. Users experience operating system quality through the shell first.
A faster File Explorer matters. Lower baseline memory usage matters. Fewer update interruptions matter. Better driver reliability matters. But if the first thing a user sees every morning is a Start menu they resent and a taskbar that refuses to behave, those deeper improvements struggle to change the overall feeling of the OS.
Microsoft seems to understand this, at least rhetorically. Its recent Windows quality messaging ties performance and reliability to craft, and craft is exactly where the Start menu lives. The shell is the handshake between the platform and the user. If the handshake feels controlling, the rest of the relationship starts badly.
That is why this news matters beyond the particular toggles. It suggests Microsoft is recalibrating what it considers quality. Quality is not just fewer crashes or faster launch times. It is also honoring the user’s environment, habits, and context.
The company should be careful not to oversell the moment. Returning missing customization after years of complaints is not innovation in the grand sense. It is repair. But repair is valuable, especially when the broken thing is trust.

The Settings That Will Decide Whether Microsoft Really Listened​

The practical impact of Microsoft’s Start menu work is narrow in the short term but meaningful in direction. These are not yet broadly available production features, and some will arrive only after more Insider testing. Still, the outline is now clear enough for users and admins to know what to watch.

• Windows 11 Insiders in the Experimental channel are beginning to receive taskbar options that allow placement on the bottom, top, left, or right edge of the screen.
• Microsoft is adding a smaller taskbar mode with reduced icon size and taskbar height while keeping the default taskbar unchanged.
• Start menu customization will add independent controls for Pinned, Recommended, and All sections, making minimal and fuller layouts officially supported.
• Microsoft plans to separate Start file recommendations from jump lists and recent files in File Explorer, fixing an overly broad setting dependency.
• The Start menu will gain Small and Large layout choices, plus an option to hide the user’s name and profile picture for privacy during sharing, presenting, or streaming.
• “Recommended” is being renamed to “Recent,” a more accurate label for a section centered on recently installed apps and recently used files.

The most encouraging thing about these changes is not that Windows 11 is getting more switches. It is that Microsoft is beginning to treat personal preference as part of quality rather than an obstacle to it. If that philosophy survives the Insider cycle, future Windows updates may feel less like negotiations with Redmond’s defaults and more like improvements to a desktop users still recognize as their own.

---

Source: Neowin Microsoft confirms more Windows 11 Start menu customization and improvements are on the way

 

[ChatGPT]

Microsoft began testing new Windows 11 personalization controls on May 15, 2026, giving Windows Insiders in the Experimental channel the ability to move the taskbar to any screen edge, shrink its height, and reshape the Start menu with new layout toggles. The timing is not accidental. After years of complaints that Windows 11 traded user control for visual consistency, Microsoft is now trying to sell customization not as a nostalgic concession, but as a quality initiative. That framing matters, because the company is not merely restoring a few missing switches; it is acknowledging that Windows lost some of its identity when it made the desktop feel less negotiable.

Microsoft Rediscovers the User Sitting in Front of the PC​

For most of Windows history, the operating system’s power came from an implicit bargain: Microsoft set the defaults, but users could push back. Move the taskbar, shrink it, stretch the Start menu, pin chaos to the desktop, install a shell replacement, or spend an afternoon making the machine look like it belonged to one person rather than a product committee. Windows was not elegant because it was pristine. It was useful because it bent.
Windows 11 weakened that bargain at launch. The centered taskbar and simplified Start menu gave the OS a cleaner first impression, but they also removed habits that millions of users had built into their muscle memory. The taskbar could no longer be moved to the top or sides of the screen. The Start menu became a fixed panel with a recommendation area many users did not ask for. Even small conveniences, like taskbar drag-and-drop, arrived late enough to feel like an apology.
That is why Pavan Davuluri’s line about personalization being in Windows’ DNA lands with a strange mix of truth and irony. He is right about the product’s heritage. He is also describing a trait Microsoft itself suppressed in the first years of Windows 11.
The new Insider changes are therefore bigger than a settings update. They are a public admission that the modern Windows shell cannot win loyalty by looking tidy while telling users to adapt. For an operating system that sits between workers and every application they depend on, control is not decoration. It is ergonomics, productivity, accessibility, and trust.

---

The Taskbar Was Always a Contract, Not a Strip of Icons​

The taskbar is easy to underestimate because it is always there. It is wallpaper-adjacent, familiar enough to become invisible until something changes. But for power users, administrators, developers, and anyone who lives in overlapping windows all day, the taskbar is not a cosmetic flourish. It is the command surface of the PC.
Microsoft’s new test finally restores the ability to place the taskbar at the bottom, top, left, or right of the display. It also supports alignment options appropriate to each position, so icons can be centered or aligned along the relevant axis. Flyouts such as Start and Search are meant to originate from the taskbar’s new location rather than pretending the bar is still at the bottom.
That last detail matters. A movable taskbar is only useful if the rest of the shell respects the move. Windows 11’s early rigidity was not just that the taskbar was locked; it was that the interface seemed designed around one blessed posture. The new work suggests Microsoft is rebuilding the shell around the idea that layout is a user preference, not an architectural inconvenience.
There are caveats. Microsoft says some polish, performance work, and known issues remain. Alternate taskbar positions do not yet support every scenario, and some touch and auto-hide behavior is still in progress. That is the predictable price of reintroducing flexibility into a shell that was redesigned around constraint.
Still, the symbolic win is large. The vertical taskbar in particular has long been more than a preference for a certain kind of Windows user. On widescreen monitors, vertical space is precious and horizontal space is abundant. Developers, spreadsheet users, and multi-window operators often gain more from reclaiming a band at the bottom of the screen than from preserving a visually conventional layout.

The Smaller Taskbar Is a Quiet Rebuke to One-Size-Fits-All Design​

The new smaller taskbar option is less dramatic than taskbar repositioning, but it may matter more on everyday hardware. Windows 11’s default taskbar was designed with modern touch targets, status areas, and visual breathing room in mind. That made sense on paper. On compact laptops, low-resolution displays, remote sessions, and dense work setups, it could also feel like the OS was spending pixels too generously.
Microsoft’s test reduces both icon size and taskbar height when the smaller mode is enabled. That distinction is important because Windows users have seen half-measures before: smaller icons that do not meaningfully reduce the occupied screen area, or settings that imply compactness without delivering it. The new implementation is intended to give back actual workspace.
There is a broader lesson here. Windows cannot assume a single physical context anymore. The same OS runs on 13-inch ultraportables, giant ultrawide monitors, tablets, handheld gaming PCs, cloud PCs, virtual desktops, and multi-monitor workstations. A roomy default may be defensible, but a roomy mandate is not.
This is where Microsoft’s quality push intersects with personalization. A UI is not “high quality” merely because it is visually consistent. It is high quality when it adapts to the jobs users actually do. A taskbar that wastes vertical space on a small screen is not polished; it is indifferent.

Start Menu Control Becomes a Test of Microsoft’s Restraint​

If the taskbar is where Windows users manage what is running, Start is where Microsoft keeps trying to mediate what comes next. That is why Start menu changes are always politically charged. The menu is part launcher, part search surface, part file history, part promotional opportunity, and part corporate battleground over what Microsoft thinks users should see.
The new Start controls move in the right direction. Microsoft is testing section-level toggles that let users hide or show Pinned, Recommended, and All apps independently. It is also renaming Recommended to Recent, a more honest label for a space that largely surfaces recently installed apps and files. Users will be able to choose small or large Start menu sizes, and Microsoft is adding a privacy option to hide the user’s name and profile picture.
The most important change may be the separation of Start recommendations from other recent-file experiences. Today, disabling certain recommended content in Start can affect recent files elsewhere, including File Explorer and jump lists. Microsoft says the new control will allow users to disable file recommendations in Start without breaking those other affordances.
That separation is exactly the kind of granular control Windows has needed. Many users do not object to recent files as a concept. They object to surfacing them in the wrong place, at the wrong time, on the wrong screen, especially during meetings, screen sharing, or streaming. Privacy in desktop UI is often less about encryption than context collapse: the machine showing something useful in one scenario and embarrassing in another.
The ability to create a pins-only Start menu is also a meaningful concession. Windows 11’s Start has often felt like a surface Microsoft wanted to keep partially reserved for its own logic. Letting users turn off entire sections says, at least in this test, that the menu can belong to the person using the PC.

---

Windows 11’s Original Sin Was Not Minimalism, but Inflexibility​

It is tempting to frame all this as Microsoft bringing back Windows 10 features. That is true, but incomplete. The deeper issue is that Windows 11 launched with an unusually narrow opinion about how the desktop should work. It prized a simplified, centered, visually modern shell over the messy configurability that had long made Windows feel like Windows.
Minimalism was not the problem by itself. A cleaner interface can be welcome, especially for new users. Windows had accumulated decades of menus, toggles, legacy behaviors, and uneven design language. A reset was defensible.
The problem was that Microsoft confused simplification with removal. It did not merely choose a new default; it eliminated alternatives. Users who had spent years working with a side taskbar or a compact shell were told, implicitly, that their workflows were edge cases.
That mistake was amplified by Windows 11’s other irritants. The OS increasingly became a stage for Microsoft account prompts, Edge nudges, OneDrive upsells, widgets, recommendations, Copilot entry points, and web-connected surfaces. Even when individual features had a rationale, the cumulative effect made Windows feel less like a neutral platform and more like a funnel.
Against that backdrop, missing customization options became symbolic. The locked taskbar was not just a locked taskbar. It was evidence, to many users, that Microsoft’s priorities had shifted from serving the desktop to managing it.

The AI Push Made the Customization Deficit Harder to Ignore​

Microsoft’s aggressive AI integration over the last few years changed the emotional temperature around Windows. Copilot and related features were positioned as the future of personal computing, but many users experienced them alongside unresolved complaints about performance, shell consistency, ads, search quality, and basic UI control. That contrast was damaging.
A user who cannot move the taskbar is less likely to be impressed by an AI button. A sysadmin dealing with Start menu clutter is less likely to celebrate another cloud-connected experience. A developer losing vertical pixels to a fixed taskbar is not comforted by marketing about productivity.
This is the context behind the backlash that has bubbled up across enthusiast communities. The anger has not simply been anti-AI. It has been anti-distraction. Windows users watched Microsoft pour energy into speculative experiences while long-standing desktop complaints lingered.
Microsoft now appears to understand that the fundamentals cannot be treated as maintenance work beneath the company’s ambition. Davuluri’s recent messaging around quality, performance, reliability, and craft points to a course correction. The new taskbar and Start work fits that narrative because it targets the part of Windows users touch hundreds of times per day.
The cynical read is that Microsoft is restoring old features only after years of complaints. The more charitable read is that Windows 11’s shell modernization took longer than expected, and Microsoft is now rebuilding flexibility atop the new architecture. Both can be true. What matters to users is whether the restored control arrives broadly, works reliably, and keeps expanding.

---

Insiders Get the First Draft, Everyone Else Gets the Waiting Game​

For now, these changes are Insider features. They are rolling out in the Experimental channel, which means they are not guaranteed to appear immediately on mainstream Windows 11 PCs. Microsoft is still testing behavior, refining fit and finish, and deciding how much of the old flexibility should return.
That delay is sensible, but it also creates a familiar frustration. Windows enthusiasts have already waited nearly five years since Windows 11’s 2021 launch for some of these controls to return. Hearing that a movable taskbar is “coming” is good news. Hearing it from the wrong side of a staged rollout is less satisfying.
The rough edges reported by early testers are also worth taking seriously. A movable taskbar touches alignment, notifications, flyouts, animations, multi-monitor logic, tablet behavior, accessibility, and third-party app assumptions. If Microsoft ships it widely before those details are right, the company will turn a trust-building feature into another example of Windows inconsistency.
Enterprise IT will be watching from a different angle. Customization is welcome, but fleet managers need policy, predictability, and supportability. If taskbar placement and Start layout become more flexible, administrators will want to know how those settings roam, how they interact with provisioning, whether they can be governed, and whether Microsoft’s defaults change under them during feature updates.
That is the enterprise version of the same user demand: control. Home users want to control their own PC. IT departments want to control thousands of PCs. Microsoft has to satisfy both without turning personalization into another management headache.

Third-Party Tools Proved the Demand Microsoft Left Behind​

One reason these changes feel overdue is that the Windows ecosystem never waited for permission. Tools like Start11, StartAllBack, Open-Shell successors, Explorer patchers, Windhawk mods, and countless registry tweaks filled the gap left by Windows 11’s narrowed shell. The existence of that aftermarket was a standing indictment of Microsoft’s priorities.
Third-party customization tools are not inherently bad. They are part of the Windows tradition, and many are excellent. But when users need them to restore basic taskbar placement or Start menu density, the platform vendor has created avoidable friction.
There is also a security and stability angle. Many shell modification tools work by hooking, patching, or replacing parts of the desktop experience. Enthusiasts may accept that risk, but businesses generally will not. The more Microsoft offers supported, native controls, the less pressure users have to rely on unsupported modifications.
That does not mean Microsoft should clone every third-party feature. Windows cannot become an infinite preference panel without collapsing under its own complexity. But there is a difference between refusing niche decoration and withholding core spatial controls. Taskbar location, taskbar density, Start size, and Start sections are not exotic requests. They are foundational desktop ergonomics.
The lesson for Microsoft is not that every old option must return forever. It is that removing mature workflows requires either a better replacement or a very good explanation. Windows 11 often offered neither.

---

The Real Test Is Whether Microsoft Can Stop Re-Learning This Lesson​

Windows has gone through this cycle before. Microsoft simplifies, users revolt, Microsoft restores, and the company announces that feedback matters. The pattern is old enough that veteran users have learned to treat reversals as part of the product lifecycle.
What feels different this time is the competitive and cultural pressure around the PC itself. Windows is still enormous, but its unquestioned centrality has faded. Developers can live in macOS, Linux, WSL, containers, browsers, and cloud workspaces. Consumers spend more of their computing lives on phones. Enterprises are increasingly comfortable abstracting the desktop through virtualization and managed services.
In that environment, Windows cannot afford to alienate the users who still care deeply about the desktop. Enthusiasts and IT pros may be a minority of the total installed base, but they are disproportionately influential. They advise families, manage fleets, write documentation, file bugs, build tools, and shape the operating system’s reputation.
Customization is one of the cheapest ways Microsoft can show respect for that group. It does not require a new AI model or a cloud subscription. It requires engineering discipline, UI humility, and a willingness to let users reject Microsoft’s preferred arrangement.
That humility is the thread connecting the new taskbar and Start work. Microsoft is not abandoning its defaults. It is admitting that defaults are not destiny.

A Windows Desktop That Bends Again​

The practical meaning of this Insider rollout is straightforward, even if the broader story is more complicated.

• Windows 11 is testing taskbar placement on the bottom, top, left, and right edges of the screen.
• The smaller taskbar option reduces both icon size and taskbar height instead of merely changing icon appearance.
• Start menu controls are being expanded so users can hide or show major sections such as Pinned, Recommended or Recent, and All apps.
• Microsoft is separating Start file recommendations from recent-file behavior elsewhere in Windows, which should reduce privacy and workflow tradeoffs.
• The features are currently in Insider testing, with polish, touch behavior, auto-hide support, and other edge cases still being worked through.
• The broader significance is that Microsoft is treating shell customization as part of Windows quality rather than as a nostalgic power-user complaint.

The encouraging part is not that Microsoft has discovered a few toggles. It is that the company is beginning to describe user control as central to Windows again. The risk is that this becomes another short burst of responsiveness followed by years of drift. Windows does not need to become a museum of every legacy behavior, but it does need to remember why people tolerated its messiness for decades: because somewhere under the defaults, the PC still felt like theirs.

---

Source: Windows Latest Microsoft admits customization is in Windows' DNA, promises new Windows 11 controls