No problem, Dave. There was certainly a lot of both good and bad information that came out right at July 29th. I did some more research today on it, and I cannot find that video or the twitter feed from Gabe Abul I mentioned.
(who says everything posted on the Internet stay there forever--LOL!). Based on the current information I read, I think Microsoft has changed their position somewhat.
This is a quote from the latest
"How to Upgrade to Windows 10" page on Microsoft.com here:
************************************************************************************************************
1 Windows Offer Details
Yes, free! This upgrade offer is for a full version of Windows 10, not a trial. 3GB download required; internet access fees may apply. Estimated retail price of Windows 10 Home shown, actual retail prices may vary. To take advantage of this free offer, you must upgrade to Windows 10 within one year of availability. Once you upgrade, you have Windows 10 for free on that device.
**************************************************************************************************************************************************
Link to above webpage:
Link Removed
What I'm finding now, is that Microsoft execs are
NOT planning on charging for the Win10 upgrade, if you have a legit upgrade path on previously licensed Win7 (SP1) or Win8.1 product; even after the July 29, 2016 date. I found some other sources that say Microsoft may charge people who got the upgrade from non-legit versions of Win7/8.1, after the July 29.2016 date, but that's not yet set in stone. Also, Microsoft may charge people for Win10 licenses if they upgraded from earlier versions of Windows such as XP or Vista via Clean Install method (given the hardware they are running on will take the W10 upgrade).
What isn't clear is whether or not if you upgrade say on Nov. 29 this month (2015), and you have gotten there by converting from a non-legit Win7/8.1 install, or XP or Vista earlier versions of Windows whether or not you have a full 1 year to use free. That would be an expiration of Nov. 29, 2016 before retail W10 pricing would kick in. ($119: W10 Home; $199: W10 Pro). 1 full year for free. With the version of the story you have, they would only have 8 months before having to pay coming up on the July 29, 2016 expiration date. I think we should stick with this story for now, better to tell users 8 months and have it wind up being a year than vice-versa.
It would appear that Microsoft is planning on giving all users until July 29, 2016 to perform the upgrade, whether from a legit earlier Windows version or not, and if legit not charge for the upgrade
EVER.
This would be concomittant with the other statements by Microsoft that there may never be a Win11, Win12, etc. just new updates.
Since I can't produce any sources, I think we should go with the current information that's on Microsoft's site and articles from reliable e-zines (
CNET, ARS, PC World, etc.).
Unless we get different input from someone posting to this thread directly from Microsoft, I think it makes sense to tell people that they have 1 full year July 29 2015-->July 29 2016 to get the free upgrade if they have a legit Win7/8.1 source; and that if you are a non-legit upgrader, you've only got 8 months before you could be charged after you do the upgrade and use it for free before having to acquire a legit license (W10 or Win7/8.1).
All of this discussion precludes people who install the Tech Preview version, or were Insiders entitled to their "free copy" of W10. It will be interesting what decision Microsoft makes about whether to charge the non-legit upgraders or not after the July 29 2016 date. The rub here is people in general will think they are going to get 1 free full-year to use the W10 before they have to pay. For legit upgraders, that seems to have gone out the window (pun intended). I think this is a good thing. For non-legit upgraders, they will not want to pay no matter what date Microsoft expires their free W10, they will look for a way to keep it running for free (a la Tech Preview editions with Microsoft accounts).
I'll defer here, and go with whatever Microsoft is currently telling us, or what they appear to be telling us until I can find a good documented source saying otherwise. I always encourage my Clients to go the legit upgrade manner anyways.
Cheers! (sorry for the lengthy post).
<<<BBJ>>>