Windows 7 Windows 7 Defragmenter

Indeed the defragmenter is vastly improved than the ones i have seen in the past. Usually it would take several hours to defrag. But i tried mine a little bit ago and it took less than 15 minutes.

And now at least it show's us a percent.
I always liked being mystified by the bars of multiple colors showing whats fragmented, and other things. Then in vista they basically ripped out the entire UI, not even a percent. Now we are halfway back with the UI, I'm no longer mystified, but at least I'm not ripping my hair out scream "What??? No UI at all?" kudos to windows 7 for saving my hair.

Kairos

P.S. hey iroken22. Is that a picture of Thor, or another Asgard? Its a shame that the series had to stop. Well I'm off to get an avatar. (probably a replicator bug. That was always my favorite enemy)

If you immediately know that the candlelight is fire then the meal was cooked a long time ago = If you made up your mind beforehand then you won't change it = have an open mind. yays for Oma.
The true nature of a man is determined in the battle between his conscious mind and the desires of his subconscious, and that the evil in one's subconscious is to strong to resist and the only way to win, is to deny it battle - Shifu

I am glad that you folks are loving it. I just tried mine and it froze at 21% while analyzing.

I still miss the win 98 defragmenter. I loved watching all the bits fly around the screen. Yes the vista defragmenter was horrible. The win 7 deal is impressivly fast.

Didn't give me a signal whether I needed to defrag or not. Maybe I missed something. Took well over an hour. Dunno. Only thing on this machine I like xp better than windows 7. (Only one try though.)

iroken22 said:

Usually it would take several hours to defrag.

Click to expand...

Several hours?

I don't think I've ever seen more than 20 or 30 minutes of defragmenting on any machine we've had here since Windows 95, and we've always had the largest hard drives we could find.

Sounds like a cpu issue more than a defragmenter issue; slow cpu=slow programs, including the defragmenter. Unless you were one of those who only did defragmenting every month or so.

Built-in Defragementer? Seriously?

Why would anyone use the built in defragmenter anyways?

The one that's in XP is a "busted" version of Diskeeper. Try JkDfreg or JkDefrag64 (Link Removed) and READ up on what defragmenting too often does to the life of your drives. Twice a month is all I've ever done it and that policy has served me well over the years even back in the Gazelle Defrag days (and no - I'm not referring to Gazelle Consulting). And, I use my systems nearly ALL THE TIME.

And don't believe the HYPE either: " Diskeeper 2009 Pro Premier will extend the life and increase the efficiency of your systems while greatly increasing workplace productivity" Ri-i-i-i-ight and I'm pregnant with twin elephants.

I do agree that it needs be done from time to time but finding the RIGHT balance of when and how often depends HEAVILY on your use patterns and that's where a product like diskeeper can help. Remember though, you will sacrifice a little bit of performance for the process that does the monitoring. On my work machine, occasionally, the diskeeper (Pro Premier 2009) background process will spike at 65% of the CPU for a few minutes. Unfortuantely for me that's USUALLY when I need to get VS.NET TS up fast to solve a production problem .

Auslogics makes a great defragmenter. That's what I use in Vista and had on XP.

But the Windows 7 defragmenter seems to be just as good and almost as fast as Auslogics.

I did notice that the Windows 7 "disc cleanup" utility is just as bad as Vista's and XP's. So I went with CCcleaner again for those chores.