mikezilla2
Senior Member
so im thinking of importing the former rather then the later but im looking at pricing i dont live in the states but like wise i am wondering what sort of prices im looking at in regards to imports
thanks
thanks
http://www.amazon.com/Crucial-2-5-Inch-adapter-Internal-CT960M500SSD1/dp/B00BQ8RGL6 might be one place.
Review http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/05/08/review_crucial_m500_960gb_ssd/
960Gb SSDs go over $1000, so this is quite nicely priced.
true but amazon wont ship hardware outside the states ie down under.......
redirects to the UK not funny man.
also
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00E3W16OU/ref=oh_details_o00_s00_i00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
I'm in the market for an SSD myself...I'm partial to the Samsung series myself.. the 840 Pro. Now Samsung has a new version out called the EVO....it has the new TLC controller instead of the MLC/MMC controller.
Yeah, mikezilla2....that's the one in your link...
I disagree with that logic. My data is worth MUCH more than my apps. And my data takes up the same amount of space regardless which drive it is on. And my data and my apps take the same amount of time to backup - longer if on multiple drives.Bass, you would want to have a separate storage for your data and system files. Having everything in one hard drive will only make the creation of image back-up take longer to finish.
How many times over the last 20 years or so have we heard (over and over again), "you will never need more disk space than that"? Or, "you will never need more RAM than that".If and when I'm ready to buy an SSD, I'm getting a 500/512 GB size. Go big or go home is my motto.
IFand ONLY IF your computer normally takes considerably less than that, then it might indicate a problem. But again, taking longer does not necessarily mean a problem. It could mean files previously being marked for deletion are being deleted during boot, before any hooks are set in them. Windows Updates frequently does not update files until the next boot.For me, if my PC boots up for more than 60sec, something is wrong with it.
If you create image backups very frequently like almost daily image backups, that might make sense to me - otherwise, I would rather figure out what is wrong and fix that - instead of simply reimaging.Instead of system restore, I do image recovery most of the time. it doesn't take long for me to do it. I am not saying I do it a lot. I am saying, that's my way.
To me, simply re-imaging (except in the case of a drive failure) is almost a cop out - essentially the same thing as format and reinstall. I don't see how you can learn first what went wrong and second, how to prevent recurrence if you reimag