I am not about to make excuses for MS policies. They don't do too badly in that field, themselves.
But, and this is only my opinion and view!, Windows 8 was pushed out with portable devices in mind. For this reason, Microsoft's comments are directed towards that. They could have, but didn't made the OS more acceptable, by promoting, and programming, the Metro and its associated parts, as an added on section. However, they chose to go the other way. The legacy desktop is the add on. Possibly, as in so much business these days, the controlling force was the accounts department. They could see the benefits of giving priority to the up and coming, and majority usage, of computers.
But, The desktop is there, (PLEASE, no comments on the absence of the old start menu!). It is identical, in every respect, to the Vista/Windows 7 desktop. In what possible way could Microsoft extoll its advantages over previous OSs - It has none.
My only complaint, of any real meaning, was the lack of multi tasking opportunity. This has been partially solved in Windoows 8.1. But Modernmix brought this back to my desktop and I have few complaints now, of any meaningful significance.
Like yourself, Mike, " This time I will create a start screen that only has the software that I use all the time", this I have also done. In fact, once you get used to it, it is considerably quicker than accessing the old start menu, even if you are diving into the "All Apps" window.
I remain astonished, when I see posted examples, by quite experienced users, of a modern, or legacy desktop, cluttered with 30 or 40 icons. Surely they cannot use all of those on a daily basis. Or?