Andrea Borman
Honorable Member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2010
- Messages
- 1,166
There are only going to be 2 editions for computers, Windows 10 Home and Windows 10 Pro. Yes it's true that on the Pro version you can choose to download or notify of updates. Where as on the Home version you can't but you won't be able to disable updates in either version as you can now on Windows 7 and 8. I set mine to "never check for updates" but this option has been removed from Windows 10.In regards to the inability to disable automatic updates, that is only for Win 10 Home, other versions of Win 10 will still retain that ability.
I don't mean that I never check for updates I do. The reason I set my Update to the never check for updates setting is so I don't have updates downloading in the background and slowing down my PC. If you have it set on never you can still check for and install updates but in your own time when you want to. Rather than having it downloading things when you are using your computer and doing something important. I think the option to force automatic updates in Windows 10 is a very bad idea. Because say you get an update for something you don't want, there will be no way to block that update. Where as in Windows 7 and 8.1 you can.Hmm... I agree with Strollin. To 'never' check is a tad wild. I always set mine to 'automatically check for updates but ask me whether to download and install them'.
Andrea's point about Windows 10 and it's new update regime does hold some water though and for many it could be a deal breaker?
If I do install buy Windows 10 I will install it on another computer. I am not going to wipe out my Windows 7 and 8 to upgrade to 10 because then you have to re-install all over again if you want to downgrade. They say the upgrade is free but after a year users will have to pay if they want to carry on using Windows 10, so I read.
I agree. I think that we should be given the same options of updating as what we had in Windows 7 and 8. There are also some updates that cause problems and you might not want to install. Therefore we should be given a choice.If they don't change it then I'm almost certain we will see a scenario much like the missing Start menu debacle. What kinda worries me the most about all of this is the fact they appear to be going down exactly the same road again without having learnt the lessons from 8.1..
Pretty sure that's wrong. I believe the ability to disable secure boot is still optional (not mandatory) and a decision left up to the Hardware OEM not the OS.Another blow is that you won't be able to disable secure boot on laptops that come pre-installed with Windows 10. So if you want to install Windows 7 or another OS you won't be able to.
Pretty sure that, that is also wrong.Also you won't be able to do a clean install of Windows because of the secure boot settings which is also wrong.
SOURCE: http://www.uefi.org/faqCan all systems disable UEFI Secure Boot?
While it is designed to protect the system by only allowing authenticated binaries in the boot process, UEFI Secure Boot is an optional feature for most general-purpose systems. By default, UEFI Secure Boot can be disabled on the majority of general-purpose machines. It is up to the system vendors to decide which system policies are implemented on a given machine. However, there are a few cases—such as with kiosks, ATM or subsidized device deployments—in which, for security reasons, the owner of that system doesn’t want the system changed.
Can UEFI Secure Boot be adopted and implemented by a variety of operating systems?
UEFI specifications are platform-independent, supporting multiple platforms and architectures. In addition, UEFI specifications are designed to promote cross-functionality, as well as to support broad adoption across multiple operating systems, including Windows as well as Linux-based operating systems. The specifications are robust and can potentially complement—or even advance—other distributions, such as Linux-based distributions.
I heard it from here although I hope it could be wrong.Pretty sure that's wrong. I believe the ability to disable secure boot is still optional (not mandatory) and a decision left up to the Hardware OEM not the OS.
Additionally as far as I know, Windows 7 is secure boot compatible as well as some of the newer versions of Linux.
Pretty sure that, that is also wrong.
Where do you come by this information? Do you make it up, or do you have some specific authoritative resources that you can link to, that support these proclamations?